ayay.. mag patay na sad mga fan bois ani ron nga comment..hehehehe...
ayay.. mag patay na sad mga fan bois ani ron nga comment..hehehehe...
naka testing nako sa ubang rigs sa Intel og AMD, lahi ragud ang performance sa intel og AMD, ang frame rates nalang daan, layo ra kaayo ang intel kaysa AMD.. i try to compare Emaxx nga NVIDIA with same proc. AMD, and Emaxx nga ATI same pud proc. AMD, layo ra gud ang NVIDIA kaysa ATI bro.. AMD + ATI = dominate..![]()
e testing nya pd sa i5 na set-up CE... hehehe... kung makapalit nka..![]()
hahaha, murag nabulabog kadjut nga naa man untay disclaimer si CE at first post...
matud pa ni comcam, unexpected lagi, which makes it worth looking at and should only contribute to our interests in both systems, not nga daug ni diri ug pildi na diri..
At first, my thoughts of i7 getting 53fps is the vertical sync. But I checked the settings and it wasnt
Diba if naka-on ang vsync, FPS synchronizes itself with the monitor refresh rate? if amd got 200+fps then ang refresh rate sa monitor sa amd diay kay naa around 200? or am i getting this all wrong?
that cant be right. 53 fps on quad SLI gtx295?
that's not corei7 fault thats nvidia's fault.
try single gtx295.
corei7 has nuting do du wid it. d ba?
use the same video card for benchmark if it's going to be intel vs amd.
try daw daw lain game mag benchmark bro.. pra ma compare na2 in different programs bah. hehe
core2duo E4300 at 3ghz 8600gt or 7600gt beats corei7 in benchmark.
somthing is wrong.
it's probably directx9 or vsync (try nvidia control panel) and enable tripple buffering.
my single gtx260 + corei7 would also beat quad sli gtx295 + corei7.
Similar Threads |
|