
Originally Posted by
raski
Why not? We must always benchmark ourselves against other countries in the region to get an idea as to how well we are doing. Those countries don't merely have "flaws" they are total disasters -- failed states. We are on our way there, but not quite there yet. I do suggest you read up on North Korea and Burma, you do not want the Philippines to be like those countries and yet, we are not really that far off from them. We are on the precipice because a desperately poor country with weak institutions and no rule of law can easily slide into anarchy giving rise to a country that will be different from what we see today and more like NOKOR or BURMA.
I got you wrong . I was thinking of comapring PHILIPPIINES to these 2 nations as better than Philippines . WHat I was thinking , its betterto compare Philippines to nations who succeeded despite of problems and setbacks like Singapore and Japan . My bad .
Well you answered your own question. Nobody is espousing the mere handing out of the $20,000 to the poor of our country, because obviously we have too many and the money would be spread so thin as to be negligible. And I have to ask where exactly in my post I even implied doing that? But the $20,000 could have been used to build how many classrooms? And supply how many books? For all your saying and whatnot you seem not to understand that "teaching people how to fish" costs money, money which is being wasted.
By saying that it is spent on something else as a WANT instead of a NEED and when we talk about POVERTY , first thing to come in mind is HUNGER . Yes you did not specifcically say it but whoever reads it thinks the same .
Now to the saying ... a BUDGET was set aside for that for the improvement of LIVELIHOOD. If the ranting was based on the 20K alone , its not the marginalized business since based from reports , it is a money owned by a private person and generated other than being a PUBLIC FUND . If that is the case ... might as well bark to the PRIVATE SECTOR .
The attitude of the citizens is influenced mostly by the attitude of the LEADERS. You will see this occur every single time across history and across many countries and cultures. That is why countries with principled leaders like Singapore (Lee Kwan Yew) have principled people and why countries with shameless losers as leaders like the Philippines have shameless losers for people. The word LEADER has as its basis LEAD. When you LEAD by example, others follow. With rampant corruption at all levels of government, it is safe to assume that they are merely following the example from the top.
Wrong . By saying that , you yourself is CORRUPT and it could be but not by nature . By voting the people who you think is right for the position and not by accepting payments reflects what kind of ATTITUDE you have . That is one scenario but what you said is a GENERALIZED STATEMENT . Mapa CORRUPT ang LEADER or dili , if walay IMPLEMENTATION sa LAW , mao na ang mo influence sa every CITIZEN . DOnt you think PRINCIPLED si LEE KWAN YEW ? YES !! CORRUPT ?? We dont know but its not safe to say NOT .
I do not deny that our culture has many flaws, but it is not per se responsible for the widespread poverty of our country and to say so borders on racism and insensitivity towards your own fellow countrymen. Unsa man diay imong pag-tuo sa pinoy? Nga born to be losers ta? Of course not. We were born into this society where those who are supposed to lead, with principle and grace, instead abuse their power with cruelty and insensitivity. Hence, the society around us, a decrepit and collapsing husk of unprincipled attitudes and bahala-na mentality.
And these statement of yours clearly justifies that IMPROVEMENT doesnt lie in the POWERS of a LEADER but by INDIVIDUAL DISCIPLINE , MOTIVATION and RESPECT .
Global warming is an impending threat to all nations, but each nation individually has the responsibility to put into place laws, systems and policies to at least mitigate its effects as we all know that when it does occur, it cannot be stopped. But things like limiting our population, for example, putting in the infrastructure necessary to deal with flooding, etc are things that can mitigate the damage, hence to say matters of global importance cannot be dealt with at a local level is misinformed. The Philippines is not going to sink totally, because it is not on as low-lying a level as these other countries, but there will be impact to our food system, among other things.
And these are all gonna happen 100 years later or so or not in our lifetime . Mao na I am strongly insisting to worry whats gonna life like 5 to 10 years or maybe in a 25 year span later aron ug unsay result sa atong LIFESTYLE living in the LIFETIME we face , will be attributed and and passed on to the next generation of Filipino's . This is beside the point though kay these are my sentimaents sa mga tao violent kaau kang MLQ .