thats what makes us wrong... OUR INTERPRETATION. You see, science don't have the basis of what is RIGHT and WRONG. And this STANDS ABOVE ALL, not TRUE OR FALSE.
Its TRUE that we can control BIRTH, But science cannot establish its RIGHT over our decision whether it is RIGHT nor WRONG. In the end, its not about SCIENCE its about MEN fighting against MORALITY.
YES, atleast there is HOPE... Sometimes the best thing in life is to hang on to something you least expected it. BELIEVING/FAITH without works is DEAD but not always the case. Point brad is this. If you think believing is WRONG for YOU. Well not for us. You declare its WRONG.. well I declare its RIGHT. Whoever got the TRUTH for sure its not you and not me.![]()
In the end you wont even believe me...
nothing in the evolution states that there is no room for GOd or a creator... GOd is still the designer...
It's a good point brad, there's something not right about the principle of a priori doubt on anything. There's a tendency that we might not move in the process of searching. That's if our good istoryan's Mr. Hellblazer implies that he subscribe to a tight view of empiricism. How can he proceed on a lead that does not have concrete truth for a moment or unverifiable for the meantime? Unverifiable does not altogether mean that an idea is false.
Take the case of the oriental science of acupuncture, western medicine in the past use to scoff at it since at that time they can't seem to find a connection to it, so nobody give it a chance; learninng stop right on then. It was not only after the discovery of opiates did acupuncture deserved a serious thought.
Last edited by Existanz; 08-26-2009 at 07:27 PM. Reason: spiling gyud..
^ but its a different kind of god , its called chemical reaction god.
the ability to create matters and energy to spectacular compositions like stars, organism, plants, supernovas,.
just because we dont know the origin of the univrse will be rational enuf to say that there is a zeus , apollo , atlas or heavenly father out there that exist without proff.
if we havent seen a mermaid doest mean taht there is a mermaid, but u cant also say that there is no mermaid.
dapat diay sakto ang timpla para dili poisonous.
most relgion is 2,000 yrs ago solution
a soap 2,000 yrs ago is a posionous solution now adays.
but science after thousand of years na creating for the best solution.
perme magka lami ang timpla. and so as in the comming years mag kanindot pajud ang timpla.
sorry if we refuse to drink ur relgion solution, but we do higly suggest and advice u stop drinking it .
Last edited by Existanz; 08-26-2009 at 06:39 PM. Reason: typo
^
its morelikely science
but still its not enuf reason to resort that there is a creator.
Similar Threads |
|