Sorry I don't buy your google handy... not my obligation.. so don't force me... hahaha!Originally Posted by Malic
selling and mentioning. hmm, i guess they are two different words.
no no no I am not transferring the responsibility but instead I am teaching you how to be a responsible seeker.google can come in handy.
why I dont want to post it? see my previous posts.
Results 101 to 110 of 257
-
07-29-2009, 07:17 PM #101Banned User
- Join Date
- Jul 2009
- Gender
- Posts
- 2,569
-
07-29-2009, 07:19 PM #102Banned User
- Join Date
- Jul 2009
- Gender
- Posts
- 2,569
You don't have evidence either that God never existence... we both have the absence of Evidence Originally Posted by tarpolano
. Absence again does not prove anything.
-
07-29-2009, 07:21 PM #103Banned User
- Join Date
- Jul 2009
- Gender
- Posts
- 2,569
Yes of course. We always have that burden true or not its a cross we have to carry because we believe. Its called responsibility of believing. Originally Posted by YLINGAO
The burden of hell lies on those who believe it
-
07-29-2009, 07:22 PM #104Banned User
- Join Date
- Jul 2009
- Gender
- Posts
- 2,569
Gud then leave us on this... not unless... Originally Posted by YLINGAO
hehehe. bati bati lang nig nawong brad pero molatigo sab ni si kebot is entitled to his own delusion so let him enjoy that delusion while he's still alive
-
07-29-2009, 07:35 PM #105Junior Member
- Join Date
- Jul 2009
- Gender
- Posts
- 175
unless what? Originally Posted by kebotDiNaMute
Gud then leave us on this... not unless...
-
07-29-2009, 07:46 PM #106Senior Member
- Join Date
- Jul 2008
- Gender
- Posts
- 603
How can I? If something does not exist do you need evidence for that? Originally Posted by kebotDiNaMute
You don't have evidence either that God never existence... we both have the absence of Evidence. Absence again does not prove anything.
-
07-29-2009, 07:56 PM #107C.I.A.
- Join Date
- Oct 2007
- Gender
- Posts
- 5,117
hehe i can now really conclude that the more you learn, the more you know how dumb you are..
people are really are complex individuals yet they are still dumb..
that goes for all of us..lolzLast edited by dartzed; 07-29-2009 at 08:23 PM.
-
07-29-2009, 08:10 PM #108C.I.A.
- Join Date
- Jun 2009
- Gender
- Posts
- 2,887
the more we discover the universe , the more we know how little we are.
-
07-29-2009, 08:28 PM #109Banned User
- Join Date
- Jul 2009
- Gender
- Posts
- 2,569
hagoy! patay! science never stops brad.... The argument stated there are two claims brad, He exist the others don't. So for sure one of us is WRONG. Kay para ta magka sinabot what to achieve gaan tika analogy ha. Originally Posted by tarpolano
argument is IS THERE A GOD?
claim 1: YES
claim 2: NO
Analogy:
Naay YUTA ingon ato LOLO.
Kinsay tagiya sa yuta? <---- argument
Ingon ko AKO <---- Claim 1
Ingon ka IMO <---- Claim 2
Question Ako ba ang yuta? Answer Dili.
Question Imo ba ang yuta? Answer Dili.
nano wala may tag iya sa YUTA(claim) because both dont have evidence. GETS?
Back to the TOPIC.
If BIG BANG will indeed be proven RIGHT then it will wipe out the very existence of the Christian God.
IS THERE A GOD? you said NO
IS BIGBANG TRUE? I said NO
So question How can you prove to something that never existed? Answer, you can if you can prove the very opposite of its NATURE. I hope brad you will understand how evidence work... it works both ways, for now brad, wala pay tag iya ang yuta kay pareho ta walay sak2 na ebidensya.
Another Thing, You can prove your innosence to a crime you never committed. If you can't then you must be the SUSPECT. HAHAHAHA!
-
07-29-2009, 08:35 PM #110C.I.A.
- Join Date
- Oct 2007
- Gender
- Posts
- 5,117
well explained kilabot aw kebot d i..ahahaha
"you may not see evidence in a crime scene but it doesn't mean it was not there" -gil grissom of csi-Last edited by dartzed; 07-29-2009 at 08:38 PM.
Reply With Quote Advertisement
Similar Threads |
|
Posting Permissions
|