sege sir morag nalagpas na noon ta aning duha...
to clear it out that lasaruz resurrection is bec. of jesus deli pasabot kai ni resurrect sya ginoo na sya.
- John 12,1
dili sir oi. Nag ampo baya to si Hesus. nag ampo to siay sa Ginoo nga unta ma resurrect si lazarrus.
Jesus saith unto her, Said I not unto thee, that, if thou wouldest believe, thou shouldest see the glory of God? Then they took away the stone from the place where the dead was laid. And Jesus lifted up his eyes, and said, Father, I thank thee that thou hast heard me. And I knew that thou hearest me always: but because of the people which stand by I said it, that they may believe that thou hast sent me. And when he thus had spoken, he cried with a loud voice, Lazarus, come forth. And he that was dead came forth, bound hand and foot with graveclothes: and his face was bound about with a napkin. Jesus saith unto them, Loose him, and let him go. Then many of the Jews which came to Mary, and had seen the things which Jesus did, believed on him. - John 11:40-45
Last edited by Malic; 07-24-2009 at 04:55 PM.
That's FALSE ANALOGY kebz..but for the sake of argument let us "accept" (without admitting) for awhile your comparison. Lets use some common sense here...if the application/program that was created would turn out to be bad anyway, why not fix the bug than reformat it, right? Or why create an application only to be deleted later? Don't you think in this case that the programmer is inefficient or doesn't know how to code?
I think you can't take the flood story literally. The "Great Deluge" is an allegorical biblical expression. The Flood represents the washing away (or baptism) while the wiping out of every creature (as described in Genesis) represents the consequence of man's sinful nature and the damnation of the earth (eschatological or end-time theology). I remember this was one of my term papers in theo school sa una in which I presented the alternative exegesis of Genesis (covering also the flood account) from the perspective of the Church of England (Anglican). But that would be off topic here![]()
Last edited by brownprose; 07-24-2009 at 05:35 PM.
hala basa sa ug bible sir ha...
naa ro...
Jesus saith unto her, Said I not unto thee, that, if thou wouldest believe, thou shouldest see the glory of God? Then they took away the stone from the place where the dead was laid. And Jesus lifted up his eyes, and said, Father, I thank thee that thou hast heard me. And I knew that thou hearest me always: but because of the people which stand by I said it, that they may believe that thou hast sent me. And when he thus had spoken, he cried with a loud voice, Lazarus, come forth. And he that was dead came forth, bound hand and foot with graveclothes: and his face was bound about with a napkin. Jesus saith unto them, Loose him, and let him go. Then many of the Jews which came to Mary, and had seen the things which Jesus did, believed on him. - John 11:40-45
ga ampo sir noh. hehehe. so sayop to imo gi ingon nga tungod ni Hesus mao ni resurrect si Lazarus.
sige sir ari sa ko.
sir nagtoon ka ug doctrine of trinity? be sincere sir? kung wala I suggest pagtoon sa para masabtan jud nimo kung unsay pasabot sa trinity.
kay ang sulti ra ba ana ingun didto nga the Three persons are distinct to each other. Distinct and each is God.
okay sir ari na jud ko kay kaon ko ug shawarma.![]()
Similar Threads |
|