CREATIONIST LIES EXPOSED in School Textbooks

[kebot]

Let me switched side for a day...hahahahaha kay na intriga ko ni Kebot...

unsa diay problema nimo ani sir?

If you assume a position that the universe is eternal( no beginning on end) then the problem is solved kung ang raw material for Evolution ang hisgutan.

- How can the first five be considered religious when there is no mention of God?
- Not all Sciences draw authenticity from empirical evidence sir.

"How can the first five be considered religious when there is no mention of God"
--- Faith is in general the persuasion of the mind that a certain statement is true
--- Religion also encompasses ... personal faith and religious experience.
Faith - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"Not all Sciences draw authenticity from empirical evidence sir. Can you see gravity?"
--- cannot be seen but can be observe.
--- Science as munzter said provides temporal TRUTH. meaning at the moment its true later may not be necessarily true.

Going back to the Board
Does evolution provide all the six information with evidence?

Questions?

[Sinyalan]

A person who does not seek knowledge is not an idiot but a hollow shell.

- martin lawrence - actor/standup comedian.

[kebot]

A person who does not seek knowledge is not an idiot but a hollow shell.

- martin lawrence - actor/standup comedian.

It might be a JOKE and you believe it... sigh! hahahhaa! so funny.

[Sinyalan]

It might be a JOKE and you believe it... sigh! hahahhaa! so funny.

hahahaha... ni kagat si kebot! hahahahaha

[Malic]

"How can the first five be considered religious when there is no mention of God"
--- Faith is in general the persuasion of the mind that a certain statement is true
--- Religion also encompasses ... personal faith and religious experience.
Faith - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"Not all Sciences draw authenticity from empirical evidence sir. Can you see gravity?"
--- cannot be seen but can be observe.
--- Science as munzter said provides temporal TRUTH. meaning at the moment its true later may not be necessarily true.

Going back to the Board
Does evolution provide all the six information with evidence?

Questions?

In religious circle 'Faith' can mean- Doctrines/theology concluded and accepted as true even with the absence of observable facts.


What about statements that are based on observable facts leading to a Scientific theory, would that still be considered as 'religious'?


Can not be seen but can be observe? correct. But let me also add this- Can not be felt and can not be captured for experimentation. But can we observe the theory? Yes we can.

In other words sir, naay butang sa Science nga dili kinahanglan ug empirical evidence.


As to your question...

Yes there are evidences that will lead you to a trustworthy Scientific theory.

[kebot]

In religious circle 'Faith' can mean- Doctrines/theology concluded and accepted as true even with the absence of observable facts.


What about statements that are based on observable facts leading to a Scientific theory, would that still be considered as 'religious'?


Can not be seen but can be observe? correct. But let me also add this- Can not be felt and can not be captured for experimentation. But can we observe the theory? Yes we can.

In other words sir, naay butang sa Science nga dili kinahanglan ug empirical evidence.


As to your question...

Yes there are evidence that will lead you a trustworthy Scientific theory.

"In other words sir, naay butang sa Science nga dili kinahanglan ug empirical evidence."
--- does it mean its true? Brad if you become a subject of electrocute to cure mental illness would you take the opportunity? Well they got a theory...

Mars? ICE CAPS? theory of life exist on mars... remember, they failed why? because they found DRY ICE not water...

Oh yea RELATIVITY? It is still theory... but seem it wont be true anymore... SPEED OF LIGHT IS NOT CONSTANT

want my proof
theory of relativity is wrong - Google Search

Theory has high possibility its wrong... Ok. so dont push your theories. Believing or not believing doesn't mean anything as long as there is no harm in life.

[Sinyalan]

psst...kebot, are you still using wikipedia as your main source of proof? ngek!

[Malic]

"In other words sir, naay butang sa Science nga dili kinahanglan ug empirical evidence."
--- does it mean its true? Brad if you become a subject of electrocute to cure mental illness would you take the opportunity? Well they got a theory...

Mars? ICE CAPS? theory of life exist on mars... remember, they failed why? because they found DRY ICE not water...

Oh yea RELATIVITY? It is still theory... but seem it wont be true anymore... SPEED OF LIGHT IS NOT CONSTANT

want my proof
theory of relativity is wrong - Google Search

Theory has high possibility its wrong... Ok. so dont push your theories. Believing or not believing doesn't mean anything as long as there is no harm in life.

Does it mean its false? We just mentioned Gravity. But your reply, since it does not show a direct answer, so I'll assume that you agreed to the proposition that there are indeed things in Science that can be proven observable and does not necessarily need to be proven by presenting empirical evidence.

electrocute to cure mental illness? Really there is such a theory? but does it have an observable result that it can heal mental illnesses?


I guess that is how Science work, they look for data...observe...theorize...then wait for more evidence. It doesnt mean that it failed, it only means shortage of evidence.


Sir let us discuss evolution, leave the Theory of Relativity for a sec.

[kebot]

psst...kebot, are you still using wikipedia as your main source of proof? ngek!

Brad si trip ingon d ko pagamiton og SCIENCE as proof, ikaw d ko pagamiton WIKI. bsin d ka ganahan na mogamit ko computer... klaroha nalang para ta mag sinabtanay... hahaha! naunsa naman mo tawon oi... d naman ko nnu pa baslon! hahaha!

[kebot]

Does it mean its false? We just mentioned Gravity. But your reply, since it does not show a direct answer, so I'll assume that you agreed to the proposition that there are indeed things in Science that can be proven observable and does not necessarily need to be proven by presenting empirical evidence.

electrocute to cure mental illness? Really there is such a theory? but does it have an observable result that it can heal mental illnesses?


I guess that is how Science work, they look for data...observe...theorize...then wait for more evidence. It doesnt mean that it failed, it only means shortage of evidence.


Sir let us discuss evolution, leave the Theory of Relativity for a sec.

brad in science if that cannot be seen that should be observe right? science is about materialism of something... tell me a fact of science that does not need observation and empirical evidence.

So as for gravity no empirical evidence but that can be observed so its a fact.

Theory qualifies that argument brad but its not fact...

"electrocute to cure mental illness? Really there is such a theory? but does it have an observable result that it can heal mental illnesses?"
--- that is why to observe is to find subjects. that is how it goes!