Should our next Constitution ban political dynasties?

[akoctin2]

---

undecided pa ko....

[colossus]

I think we can, if we put it in our Constitution. Right now, the present Constitutional provision banning political dynasties needs a positive act from Congress for it to have effect. But since the Congress will have difficulty in passing such piece of legislation, it will be a dormant provision until we find some courage to amend or revise the Constitution.

As for me, I would want a self- executing provision with regard to political dynasties. At least, even if we will have a parliamentary form of government, if we will not have political dynasties and limit terms of those who are in public office, it will be for our benefit.

[juan penduko]

lets just concentrate on this topic. coz the whole political system is bulok naman jud.

dili man sad cguro maayo kun ibawal kai kinahanglan paman mo dagan ang usa ka tao para ma elect. so its still the prerogative of the people kun i.vote nato ang anak or asawa sa incumbent official.

[JJstyles]

They should ban... why mao ni cause nga buhaton nla ang tanan pra lng ma keep ang position nla.. since na-anad naman gd cla nga ela family ang hawak ana nga lugar....so dli cla ka dawt if lain na pd ang mag manage... example naa daghan dri sa cebu

[clarkhkent]

maayu lagi unta pero ang mga assembly man nga na belong anang charter change belong man ghapon to a certain family of politiko so wa ghapon tay mahimo...

hinoon sad dili man tanan political dynasties ngil-ad naa man sad maayu pero pipila ra sad lagi...waaa...faets!