Why does pure EVOLUTIONIST never won in a debate against CREATIONIST?

[The_Child]

---

just because creationism is unlikely, does not mean the explanation must be evolution theory.

for the lack of anything decent, one prefers eating mud over hunger.

[kebot]

HOVIND nafooood!?

kebs, for once try using a credible source man lang.

nah ga ya!ya! raning mga evolutionist jud.. walay jud ka appeal2 sa debate... tsk tsk tsk... brad d nalang ta mag debate diri kay low ballers ra kaau ta compare sa ilang mga presentation... ka2 link nindot, pwerte ka daghan og doctor sa biology ang tonto walay ipakita na proof puro ra storya... hahaha

Brad nano di ma prove ang evolution? Kay it requires PARENT and SIBLINGS... if there is a new species daw... its hard to find the parent to present it as credible proof... and he said we humans are not capable... hahaha! wat an excuse... so? d nalang ta ana kay d daw ta capable mangita asa ang parent.. wtf.... idiota jud... ambot lang brad pero nndot iyang theory gi present d lang maka pasar sa standard.. hahaha!

FACT hahaha! ga dreaming tawon... brad gae ko debate na link be na kulata creationist... ayaw low ballers ha kay balik2 ra question pareho diri...

[tripwire]

kebz, let's pretend that there is no evolution or nothing at all. I have few questions [I asked you these before but you haven't answered it]:

1. can you explain what is a rainbow and why we have rainbows everytime there is/are drizzle(s)?
2. can you explain why there is volcano and why there are still growing?
3. can you explain earthquakes?
4. can you explain thunderstorms and lightnings?
5. can you explain why there are typhoons?
6. can you explain why people have different faces?

Kana lang sa. I hope you will find good explanations based on creationist views.

[kebot]

Watching? Not reading?


Actually kebz, no one is forcing you or anyone... I can see posts that are bit convincing but they aren't. the argumentation rules to give something reasonable either by straightforward of not - that depends on how the person reads it. you can't see their emotions while typing di ba? maybe they are just giving you something to look forward but you took it as convincing or forcing you to believe. Some members are low-blow but hey, that's how they argue because their pride and ego are touched... just like you. Defense mechanism I should say. I know that you are defending what The Bible said and that's the same as we believe in evolution. We provided referrals or read outs so you and some people can understand what are we talking about not just hibie-jibies argument. We don't argue that the other party doesn't have sufficient ideas to argue because it will be a boring argument.

That's the reason why kebz you have a huge misconception about evolution, big bang, because you don't read books. Now, how would you know stuff if you don't read? This I can conclude also that you don't read the bible - because that's also a Book. The very good argument is to have a thought provoking process. One can give ideas and expands as it go along not staying in the same path. Just like studying martial arts [my kids are] and I understand why masters teach 3 or 5 techniques to his students and he let them rediscover things from that 5 techniques or steps. I am no martial artist but I know the concept of being a martial artist... to discover as your journey goes on. let's put that in to your ideas... you have couple of them and you should discover it for yourself what those theories are. Discover means, read books, learn from many sources not just what you hear. Debating don't give you enough understanding... you discover and you understand. Believing? That's entirely up to you... when you're done, come back here and we'll discuss more on what you learn.

Remember: Seek and you shall find.

"Actually kebz, no one is forcing you or anyone"
You are not reading trip... hahahah! watching vs reading I prefer watching... a whole book can be seen in 2 hours... if you say book is better, i don't care to me just the same.. same author same story... i maybe you are not evolving trip.. try watching than reading..

Me don't read books? hahaha! TRIP I don't know but so far i never seen a debate that evolutionist won... can you provide me link? Why huh, if you are on solid as you claim you are... isn't it obvious...

TRIP IT HAS BEEN A 150 years since darwin... and what did evolutionist have done? they ask another 50... well go ahead.. as of now nothing concrete has been provided...

[kebot]

kebz, let's pretend that there is no evolution or nothing at all. I have few questions [I asked you these before but you haven't answered it]:

1. can you explain what is a rainbow and why we have rainbows everytime there is/are drizzle(s)?
2. can you explain why there is volcano and why there are still growing?
3. can you explain earthquakes?
4. can you explain thunderstorms and lightnings?
5. can you explain why there are typhoons?
6. can you explain why people have different faces?

Kana lang sa. I hope you will find good explanations based on creationist views.

WT..F trip are these evolution question? are you questioning bible against science... move on trip... science explain those things... evolution is not science at the moment... its based on assumption and story... do you carbon dating is not accurate and yes the drop a lot of findings that does not conform to thier standard... I cant believe you are asking these questions...

Or should I answer this... NATURE CREATED IT? oh cmon.... Creationism is about God explaining the Beggining of life... that's all... you are not reading the bible trip... Creationism is based on the Bible about the BEGGINING not how... omg...

[bluedes]

"Actually kebz, no one is forcing you or anyone"
You are not reading trip... hahahah! watching vs reading I prefer watching... a whole book can be seen in 2 hours... if you say book is better, i don't care to me just the same.. same author same story... i maybe you are not evolving trip.. try watching than reading..

Me don't read books? hahaha! TRIP I don't know but so far i never seen a debate that evolutionist won... can you provide me link? Why huh, if you are on solid as you claim you are... isn't it obvious...

TRIP IT HAS BEEN A 150 years since darwin... and what did evolutionist have done? they ask another 50... well go ahead.. as of now nothing concrete has been provided...

brad, haven't you noticed that nobody gives a sh*t whether you believe in evolution or not..
ang ka-apan gud nimo kay you see it as "winning" and "losing" a debate.. creationism vs. evolution? gimme a break.. since when nagkigkombate ang evolution against creationism? murag ang creationism man ang na-insecure, mao makigdebate dayon sa evolution. news flash, wala juy paki ang mga scientists kung unsay arguments sa creationism..

[kebot]

kebz, let's pretend that there is no evolution or nothing at all. I have few questions [I asked you these before but you haven't answered it]:

1. can you explain what is a rainbow and why we have rainbows everytime there is/are drizzle(s)?
2. can you explain why there is volcano and why there are still growing?
3. can you explain earthquakes?
4. can you explain thunderstorms and lightnings?
5. can you explain why there are typhoons?
6. can you explain why people have different faces?

Kana lang sa. I hope you will find good explanations based on creationist views.

OMG jud... OK just prove these questions as part of EVOLUTION FINDINGS... lets see if you can prove it...

[tripwire]

"Actually kebz, no one is forcing you or anyone"
You are not reading trip... hahahah! watching vs reading I prefer watching... a whole book can be seen in 2 hours... if you say book is better, i don't care to me just the same.. same author same story... i maybe you are not evolving trip.. try watching than reading..

skewed logic. Watching is better than reading? well, don't know about you kebz but I prefer reading because I get all the context. Btw, you can watch a book and then know what's in that book? Why people will prefer reading than watching a movie? Like, oh.. i've seen the movie but I prefer the book better. Do you now that comments? The same author but different director - if it made to a movie. that's why I said, skewed logic. Sorry if said that but please READ... don't rely on WATCHING.

Me don't read books? hahaha! TRIP I don't know but so far i never seen a debate that evolutionist won... can you provide me link? Why huh, if you are on solid as you claim you are... isn't it obvious...

well, this is going in circles again kebz... if you don't read, i don't have to explain everything evolution to you anymore. OH, please answer those questions on the top, please. Make sure it is explained properly in creationist views and not evolutionary process.

TRIP IT HAS BEEN A 150 years since darwin... and what did evolutionist have done? they ask another 50... well go ahead.. as of now nothing concrete has been provided...

Again, your knowledge about evolution isn't there yet. Read and I'll answer your queries about Charles Darwin. Okay?

[bluedes]

naa lang ko question nimo brad kebz..

ang mga muslims ug jews parehas man ug creation story diba? ngano dili man sila mangusug ug creationism? ngano maka-accept man sila ug evolution?

points to ponder lng na brad..

[tripwire]

OMG jud... OK just prove these questions as part of EVOLUTION FINDINGS... lets see if you can prove it...

Christ! kebz, don't ask me my questions. I know what the answers are but I want you to give me answers in creationist point of views. Can you handle that?