Yes
No
and does ur parents rate u as a daughter?
can u imagine if ur parents had aborted u?
while ur still 25days old?
im against d legalization of abortion here in the Philippines
nganong pro-LIFE man ang tawag nga pro-HUMANBEING man ang gihisgutan. kung pro-LIFE, e di apilon sad nato ang tanang living things sa kaning kalibutana.
excuse me?
i think ur not in the right track..
or ur another atheist
or another halfly religion educated christian..
not religious beliefs?
what is the basis of ur approval or disapproval then?
human rights? cuz it's individuals' right to have abortion?
morality ? cuz its immoral to legalize abortion?
upbringing background?
cuz raised liberatedly. and values own life.body and action for own gain and nothing more
cuz raized in a family that values life as leaned in the religion as every sexual act is gift or PROCREATION..
if it's not in the list, what is the discussion here then?
or u are not reading the earlier posts?
have it your way sir but in your argument i think there is a topic in S & O already.
FYI: even atheists know that killing is bad/not good to society...
Last edited by joshua259; 07-06-2009 at 12:50 AM.
they should legalize this. theres no point in letting the child live and suffer while at. and what i mean about suffering is that parents cant afford to feed them or have them educated that ounce they grow up they will turn to crime and eventually cause even more damage to society and yes people if they kill any.
Abortion is dangerous to the mother whether it's legal or not. And it is always dangerous to the unborn child,
Deliberate act by whom? The unborn child is NOT responsible for being conceived. It is most certainly NOT a deliberate act by the unborn child. The unborn child cannot deliberate as it is not old enough to reason (usually the age of reason is put at 7 years old).A foreign object growing inside of you is a DELIBERATE ACT.
But she does NOT have rights over the unborn child's right to life.Additionally, the uterus is the woman's uterus- not yours. Therefore, she has rights over it- you DON'T.
IT IS VERY MUCH A PERSON. Your looks do not determine if you are a human being, and changing your looks cannot suddenly make you human either. So if an embryo isn't a human, why should a baby be considered human. Your definition of "human" is arbitrary. And it doesn't agree with the definition if even others who would promote the RH bill.This is 25-day embryo. Not much of a person, is it?
Thanks. I guess that's because "conservative" technically isn't the same as "pro-life". I think most conservatives, however, would still choose to protect the life of the unborn no matter what the sexual preferences of that unborn person may turn out to be. Usually it's the so-called liberals who choose to kill innocent unborn children.I'm glad you choose to "protect" them regardless of their sexual preference. Most conservatives don't.
Similar Threads |
|