
Originally Posted by
foolonthehill
Mr Unsay Ngalan NImo.
You actually believed the article written in Rational Choice? Are you sure you know what you are reading?
The person who wrote it used the homeowner and the helpers salary as merely money transferred from one hand to another, and that accdg to the supposed economist who wrote that blog, the total money is the same.
Ha ha ha ha...
Im sure you are not an economist Mr Ngalan, and so you blindly accept the blog of an economist (blindly)...
Why is that funny? bec the supposed economist does not even know what he is talking about.
And here is what you should know too.. MONEY transferred from the homeowner to the helper is not a matter of 100+0= 100 and that 80+20 = 100 (the total being the same).
NO NO NNO way...!!!! Why? Dont forget this.. and read the book bec I know you did not read the book.
the total is not the same because MONEY is created (not conserved!!), there is MONEY multiplier, and the Keynesian multiplier.
Read the two chapters on these topic in the Hyperwage Book.
If you have read them and still you dont understand, then DONT pretend to know. If you dont understand, DONT talk.
Since I read that blog too before as I googled Hyperwage, if you had a better background in economics Mr. Ngalan, you will realize that:
- the blogger who is an economics student, shows his ignorance of economics itself, by saying that thed principle in MONEY Multiplier is DIFFERENT from the Keynesian multiplier.
HIs fallacious reasoning? That money multiplier is due to teh banking system. What baloney! That is economic ignorance outright.
The fact is, the same principle and mechanism works in the Money multiplier in banks and the Keynesian multiplier, and indeed teh Keynesian multiplier is the Money multiplier.
And their underlying process? Its also in the Hyperwage book: The infinite geometric progression for r<0.
BUt I dont think you know what that progression means. Bec if you knew what that means, and if you have read the book, then there is no other conclusion: Keynesian multiplier and the money multiplier ARE NOT different, they have the same underlying process.
I agree with the other pro Hyperwage here, we use the same language because we have read and understood the book. I was teacher of advance calculus before, and I understood Hyperwage Theory immediately because it is mathematically consistent.
Have you read the chapter on "Repealing the law of supply and demand?" read it. if you cant understand it, I cant be responsible for your confusion.
Do you even understand NONLinear systems?
All the reasoning are found in the book, Grabe! The book is self consistent and perfectly logical. The more highly educated you are, the more you realize how deep it is.
At first, I was a negative reader because I thought "this is against econ 1" but then when I read it, I realized, it was not against econ 1. It was actually beyond econ 1. Econ 1 is merely a special case, while Hyperwage is the general theory.
Just remember this, your friends and relatives are in the US not because they love the Philippines but because they love the Hyperwage of the USA.
The theory is not funny. It is you who are funny.
and money paikot ikot is NOT the same total anymore. It is actually MULTIPLIED. It is obvious you dont understand the multiplier effect.
Now thats funny.. somebody poohing an economic theory when this person doesnt even know what a multiplier is.
REad more, learn more.
no im not an economist, im pol sci graduate na puro econ ang subjects...

technically hindi numerical ang approach namin sa econ but basically its impact...

economic policy and its impact sir ganun ang approach namin... kase you cant measure lang by numbers lang sir...
yes in one of our econ class naging topic ang hyperwage theory sir... so we have to at least gloss or read the book...

we did had a debate on the theory though...
you can say the GDP increase or infaltion rate is down but at the micro level hindi yun ramdam... ganun ang approach namin sir.. hindi ako economist.. hahahaha.. and the theory lacks practicality...
lets say maging economic policy ng phils ang hyperwage so we have janitors earning 20-25k, (maganda pakingggan diba...) tanong ko lang sir dapat din natin pataasin ang sweldo ng mga amo nila diba? by how much sa tingin mo?
if a clerk earns 8K every month and a programmer earns at least 18k a month and we raise the minimum wage.. so the clerk will be earning 25k to 30k? how much should a programmer earns? 60k - 70k?
one of our comparative advantage with other state sir our low labour cost... in reality there will alot of factory that will have to close down becasue they will going to CHina and Vietnam or India na maslow ang labour cost...
so how will hyperwage solve the problem on unemployment?
hyperwage is only ideal if we own our resources and our businesses sir.. and at this time... hindi po yan applicable...