Athiesm is dangerous

[Hellblazer 2.1]

ah ok that makes sense, non sense

my point exactly, mr.fish. as well as several others here (atheists or not-so-extreme theists alike), share a similar opinion.

[sizz-lorr]

im a RC im more dangerous than the atheists..hehe

yes you are, no contest. no contest.

[LIBER777]

when did this started? Atheism is dangerous, what have they done to deserve it?

The supporting evidence is not good, so we should remain skeptical........

[dartzed]

yes you are, no contest. no contest.

Nooooooooooottt!!...

[LIBER777]

Atheists are more "spirituality independent" than theists. I merely substituted financial stability for spirtuality, in my analogy. So please do not confuse "poor" to mean financially poor/rich. Doing so would mean you're interpreting my analogy literally rather than symbolically.

-RODION

Your right ...... The logic of this argument seems a bit hard to grasp. I shall set it out semi-formally as I understand it.

[kebot]

i cant imagine an atheist like me can do such killings...can't imagine either godly people kill like crazy. ka weeeeeiird!

Do you know the reason behind these wars? As far as I understand, It started from a provocative cheap talk then LINABAYAY og TAE, Then sparks came, then a tribe of men came, then anger came aroused by PRIDE. Then HOLY WAR is ON.

Brad not all wars are based on religion, Most wars are based on the LEADER's Interest. D jud ko mag lider lider kay basin kta maoy hinungdan sa GIRA.

Maayo lang unta og walay mag LIDER LIDER DIRI SA ISTORYA PARA WALAY GIRA.

Opinion rani ha... Subject to ERRORS. hahaha

[kebot]

Beyond Good and Evil

Summary: An oft-scribbled bit of college-campus graffiti says: “‘God is dead’--Nietzsche” followed by “‘Nietzsche is dead’--God.” Nietzsche’s profession that “God is dead” appeared in his 1882 book, The Gay Science, but under-girded the basic theme of Beyond Good and Evil, which was published four years later. Here Nietzsche argued that men are driven by an amoral “Will to Power,” and that superior men will sweep aside religiously inspired moral rules, which he deemed as artificial as any other moral rules, to craft whatever rules would help them dominate the world around them. “Life itself is essentially appropriation, injury, overpowering of the strange and weaker, suppression, severity, imposition of one’s own forms, incorporation and, at the least and mildest, exploitation,” he wrote.

One of the most Famous book of ATHIEST. Any ATHIEST READ THIS BOOK? Is this a Good Book?

[Sinyalan]

Atheism is dangerous ? ??

Why do you think it is dangerous for you or to anyone else?

Because maybe a threat to your beliefs?

One of the most Famous book of ATHIEST. Any ATHIEST READ THIS BOOK? Is this a Good Book?

Why don't you read it? Because If I say it's a good book... I am biased. If you read it, then you will know.

[chad_tukes]

i don't get either how Atheism became dangerous.

it's like saying that i'm a danger to society because i don't believe in God.

[vanschen]

athiests without morals or have weak sense of good or bad are dangerous.

absence of proof is not proof of absence.