Second Look on Islam

[Malic]

---

Pork, source of 'bad' bacteria: studies
CBC News, 28 December 2001

CHICAGO - New studies on food safety have found pork may contain even more dangerous germs than poultry. The findings were presented at the 2001 Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy in Chicago. A team of researchers at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention tested nearly 600 packages of ground pork purchased from different grocery stores in five states. They found high levels of Enterococci bacteria, a common cause of food poisoning that is resistant to antibiotic drugs.

Scientists say patients who have antibiotic-resistant enterococcal infections have a death rate of 37 per cent. Enterococci were found on three per cent of ground pork.

"With pork chops or steaks, you've got bacteria contamination on the outside," says lead researcher Jennifer McClennan. And with ground meats, the bacteria are found throughout, making them more dangerous.

"You've got to make sure to cook (pork) thoroughly."

As a result, McClennan says cooks should follow stringent practices when they prepare pork and anything cooked less than medium is probably not a good idea. Another study presented at the symposium raised further concerns about pork.
Dutch researchers found the Enterococci bacteria in pigs cause more trouble for humans than the same type of bacteria found in poultry. The researchers recommended farmers use antibiotics sparingly on their animals. About half of the antibiotics given to animals worldwide are used so they can grow bigger and remain disease-free.

The continuous exposure to antibiotics can also alter the balance of good to bad germs, promoting the antibiotic-resistant strain of bacteria in the animal. Resistant strains can be passed on to humans when they consume the meat of the animal. Researchers found these bacteria in pork seemed to survive and thrive longer in humans than those found in poultry.

[handsoff241]

^Sir malic, I love your new ava.. but that post is quite a weak argument.

[regnauld]

^Sir malic, I love your new ava.. but that post is quite a weak argument.

So, what do you think is the stonger argument my friend?

[rcruman]

Only Allah knows...But im sure they will have their own rewards. By the way the 72 virgins is not what is in the Qur'an.

diba mao ni ang ingon sa mga sheik sa mga suicide bomber?
nakakita man gud ko ani sa salida nila bruce willis og denzel washington.
i know that Islam/Muslim are very particular in terms of filming about Islam.

Peace!

[schmuck]

sakto si Malic, wala sa Quran, naa ra sa Hadith. Naai sects sa Islam nga dili motuo/follow sa Haddiths

[rcruman]

why man kung ang ila sheik moistorya kay iapil ang quran?
magbasa pa gani una putlan og liog, like sa salida nila leonardo og russell.

Peace!

[GrEenOCIDE]

ok ra ng STI basta dili lang ta motalaw ug mag tago tago kung hagdon ta ug debate kaysa mag pa STI nya TALAW diay to...

pwerteng talawa mao nang nagpataka nalang ug yawit

in other term, naratol

[kowkruche]

Kinsa man ang lider aning muslim ron? wala man nailhi, sila man kaha ang tinood.

[Malic]

^Sir malic, I love your new ava.. but that post is quite a weak argument.

and how can we know that its weak? Its easy to assume but its hard to prove.

you see i dont just believe everything...

[Malic]

diba mao ni ang ingon sa mga sheik sa mga suicide bomber?
nakakita man gud ko ani sa salida nila bruce willis og denzel washington.
i know that Islam/Muslim are very particular in terms of filming about Islam.

Peace!

ah ok...so imo pagsabot sa Islam kay gi based nimo sa Hollywood Movie.