Yep, the Shat looked good then. As big a fan as I was of ST TOS, I don't want him in the movie, he wouldn't be credible as a Star Fleet officer for me because I have him associated with his character in "Boston Legal" now. Like my friend says, he's "all butterball".
Yes, and Captain Pike made a reappearance in "The Menagerie". Disabled already, though. I thought if they were going for an alternate timeline, they might as well have kept him healthy. But he's still better off than in ST TOS. Oh, and the alternate timeline conveniently let them do away with that confusing "Fleet Captain" rank. Pike bumped up to Admiral.Originally Posted by cooldude75ph
At least the Enterprise wasn't running on Microsoft Windows. Then again, maybe blue screen error tong part where dili mo start ang Enterprise.
Waitaminit, Starfleet starships DO run on Windows:
Results 41 to 50 of 57
-
05-11-2009, 08:58 AM #41Elite Member
- Join Date
- May 2006
- Posts
- 1,823
Last edited by dubioz; 05-11-2009 at 09:22 AM.
-
05-11-2009, 09:46 AM #42Elite Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2005
- Posts
- 1,374
it's about time that they give the good old star trek an update. from what i've heard, rottentomatoes gave it an almost 100% rating. LOL.
-
05-11-2009, 12:22 PM #43Elite Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2005
- Posts
- 1,291
I'm happy to see that people here agree that JJ Abrams was 'respectful' to the original series. I'm not a hardcore trekkie but I did grow up on the series, watching it together with my parents and siblings religiously in the 70's.
I hope to watch it within the week.
-
05-11-2009, 01:56 PM #44Junior Member
- Join Date
- Jul 2005
- Posts
- 319
so my question after watching the movie is
Spoiler!
-
05-11-2009, 11:49 PM #45Senior Member
- Join Date
- Nov 2008
- Posts
- 695
My answer to the question is.... Originally Posted by BoMBriones
Spoiler!
dubioz@
That's really funny dude! LOL!
-
05-12-2009, 08:19 AM #46
Your last sentence is incorrect. Originally Posted by gian7675
My answer to the question is....
Spoiler!
dubioz@
That's really funny dude! LOL!
-RODION
-
05-12-2009, 09:32 AM #47C.I.A.
- Join Date
- Jan 2005
- Posts
- 5,246
For those who want to nitpick at the new Star Trek movie -> Bad Astronomy’s Review of the Science of ‘Star Trek’
-
05-12-2009, 10:37 AM #48Junior Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2009
- Posts
- 144
nice! almost 100% rating on Rotten Tomatoes? I've never been a Trekkie but this thread is making me eager to make a beeline for the nearest ticket counter. Pero end of the month pa man na mag showing diri sa akong location. No spoilers lang sa.
The best thing about being a non-Trekkie and watching this movie is, in my opinion, having no expectations or points of comparison at all, so enjoy2x lang all the way. Especially with all those action and effects. Weee!
Did you know the old Sulu also had a huge part on Heroes? Remember Hiro Nakamura's father? Hihi...
Lastly, to those who enjoy satirical humor, here's a fake review of the Stark Trek movie on the Onion News Network. I find it funny
-
05-12-2009, 11:04 AM #49
Hehe, Phil couldn't resist. He's an excellent writer and lecturer. I own one of his books (Bad Astronomy). Originally Posted by cooldude75ph
-RODION
-
05-12-2009, 11:23 AM #50Junior Member
- Join Date
- Jul 2005
- Posts
- 319
i gotta agree with Rod - the last line of Ambassador Spock was "since it will sound more self-serving, i'd rather say (along with the signature Vulcan hand sign) 'good luck!'" Originally Posted by rodsky
but thanks for the great replies!
Reply With Quote
His pointy ears made me look at him as a horny rabbit 
Similar Threads |
|
Posting Permissions
|