
Originally Posted by
giddyboy
u r ryt. this forum may not be a court, but people here deserve opinions with facts and figures as bearing, and not some propagated hearsays and rumors. otherwise, we myt as well call this forum as "chismis.net"...LOLs
yeah i heard that a thousand times. but making motherhood statements like that is in no way a good argument. mao2x rana sa squid tactics ni Tomas et al...LOLs
easy for u to say. op kors, u could have a 1M project cost and spend only 500K and give a documentation for 1M. kana kung wa lage ka masakpi...saunz ang FLI deal nasakpan man. LOLs...dili man bogo ang COA or other independent watchdogs pre...
No, u r wrong on my analogy there. kung legal and found out still to be legal after such investigations, then legally walay tikas.
But kung mag base ta sa imong PERCEPTION LAW sir, some would still assume naay tikas. Let's try to differentiate the two please. LOLs
The only realistic fact about ur statement is that it is a motherhood statement trying to distract us from the real topic. that is just a sour-graping ky ang imong manok nga opaw nasakspan man while ang sa pikas manok nga igat (assuming naay tikas) wala gayud bsan pa giunsa ug bali-bali...
that is as realistic as it gets...LOLs
I say this and i say this again: PJ's House inquiry is his legal right as a Cebuano and a taxpayer. Morally and politically speaking, that is debatable as some would say it is not and some would say it is. of course that totally depends on every person's perspective.
that is as realistic as it gets.