Name sa Gino-o

[regnauld]

Who Am cguro.
btw, naai Branch of Buddhism nga giconsider si Buddha as god, called Mahayana Buddhism.

Mahayana Buddhism is an exoteric branch of Buddhism.

Esoteric Buddhism is generally classified under the Great Vehicle (Mahayana) Buddhism. There are two parts to it: the Exoteric and the Esoteric Buddhism. In order for us to understand Esoteric Buddhism, we need to explore the origin as well the the constituents philosophy and historical context how the school come about.
The Exoteric Buddhism is based on Madhyamika ('middle way') of Nagarjuna.
The Esoteric Buddhism is unique and requires the study of the Exoteric Buddhism as the foundation and puts the Esoteric Buddhism as the most advanced form of Buddhism. We assume that students have a basic theological knowledge of Buddhism as well as Exoteric Buddhism.

[regnauld]

not christianity. but catholic only.

Yes to be specific because not everybody in Christianity believes in trinity like the ADD.

[regnauld]

Mao ba? That's interesting. I'll look into that.

Isn't it interesting that the apostle Thomas, who doubted Jesus' resurrection, chose India as the place where he preached the Gospel?

THE HOLY TRINITY IN HINDUISM

Later on, names were given to these different aspects of nature. There was a Creator called Brahma (creation) and a Preserver called Vishnu (preservation) with a Destructor called Sivan (destruction). Together these three forces maintain the cycle of nature. Brahma, being the creator (positive) is the proton; Vishnu, being the preserver (neutral) is the neutron and Sivan, being the destroyer (negative) is the electron.
This is the Holy Trinity of Hinduism - a trinity that is present in every atom. In the light of this discussion, of what use are arguments about who is greater: Brahma, Vishnu or Sivan; Of what use are arguments about whether Vaishnavism or Saivism is the greater? Believing in one and excluding the other is like saying: “I am not interested in the atom, I am only interested in one part of the atom.”

[flying fish]

Mahayana Buddhism is an exoteric branch of Buddhism.

Esoteric Buddhism is generally classified under the Great Vehicle (Mahayana) Buddhism. There are two parts to it: the Exoteric and the Esoteric Buddhism. In order for us to understand Esoteric Buddhism, we need to explore the origin as well the the constituents philosophy and historical context how the school come about.
The Exoteric Buddhism is based on Madhyamika ('middle way') of Nagarjuna.
The Esoteric Buddhism is unique and requires the study of the Exoteric Buddhism as the foundation and puts the Esoteric Buddhism as the most advanced form of Buddhism. We assume that students have a basic theological knowledge of Buddhism as well as Exoteric Buddhism.

first sentence ni confliuct sa second,
Mahayana is the eso, hinayana is the exo
Both does not believe in God(anthropomorphic), but believes in gods, chohans/planetary spirits. or the hierarchies

[regnauld]

first sentence ni confliuct sa second,
Mahayana is the eso, hinayana is the exo
Both does not believe in God(anthropomorphic), but believes in gods, chohans/planetary spirits. or the hierarchies

Thanks Flying Fish. Yes corection bro! Thanks I didn't mean it and that was an honest mistake.

[josephdc]

THE HOLY TRINITY IN HINDUISM

Later on, names were given to these different aspects of nature. There was a Creator called Brahma (creation) and a Preserver called Vishnu (preservation) with a Destructor called Sivan (destruction). Together these three forces maintain the cycle of nature. Brahma, being the creator (positive) is the proton; Vishnu, being the preserver (neutral) is the neutron and Sivan, being the destroyer (negative) is the electron.
This is the Holy Trinity of Hinduism - a trinity that is present in every atom. In the light of this discussion, of what use are arguments about who is greater: Brahma, Vishnu or Sivan; Of what use are arguments about whether Vaishnavism or Saivism is the greater? Believing in one and excluding the other is like saying: “I am not interested in the atom, I am only interested in one part of the atom.”

I think the Holy Trinity in Christianity is significantly different from the trinity that you ascribe to those deities in Hinduism. For example, in Christianity, God created the universe through his Son, Jesus. In Hinduism, it appears that those deities that you mentioned that forms a sort of trinity is identical with the universe.

[regnauld]

I think the Holy Trinity in Christianity is significantly different from the trinity that you ascribe to those deities in Hinduism. For example, in Christianity, God created the universe through his Son, Jesus. In Hinduism, it appears that those deities that you mentioned that forms a sort of trinity is identical with the universe.

It seems there is a difference because in Christanity it has a different dogma but when you look to it in essence, you will see the parallelism. In fact, the Holy trinity in Christianity is nothing new. It is just a borrowed concept from Hinduism and it was explained in different form. Hinduism can be considered as ancient religion.

[josephdc]

^ Well, there are apparent parallels, but it doesn't mean they are essentially the same. I'm not sure about the doctrine being "borrowed" from that or any other source. The difference between the Trinity in Christianity and the one that you said is present in Hinduism is that in Christianity God is the creator of the universe, while in Hinduism it seems God is indistinguishable from nature.

[regnauld]

^ Well, there are apparent parallels, but it doesn't mean they are essentially the same. I'm not sure about the doctrine being "borrowed" from that or any other source. The difference between the Trinity in Christianity and the one that you said is present in Hinduism is that in Christianity God is the creator of the universe, while in Hinduism it seems God is indistinguishable from nature.

Yes because GOD in Hinduism is both Immanent and Transcendent.

[josephdc]

^ But God can't be both the creator and the creation at the same time, di ba?