mao jud ni basically ang difference sa opinion between those who want statehood with the US and those who don't: the latter still believe in the people's capacity to change the country, while the former have run out of hope. so ang bottomline jud diri kay hope.Originally Posted by gareb
the power to change the country is really latent in the people. it's just a matter of making them aware that they have that power. a matter of making them understand that the future of the country is in their hands. by "just" i don't mean it's a simple thing. it's a simple enough *concept* but tremendously hard to do. that's what civil society, NGOs, cause-oriented groups are doing. you could say that they are optimists. because they rise to the challenge. the challenges we all face hovers above us like a monster, but these people never give up. mao na siya basically ang naka-lahi nila sa mga taw nga pro-statehood. the pro-statehood people do have noble intentions, pero lahi ilang nakita nga "solution" sa ato mga problema. gusto nila statehood. they fail to see the absurdity of that proposition. in an ideal world, that would be perfect. they overlook the fact that america is not the benevolent uncle they believe it to be. they overlook the fact that america is responsible (at least partially) for our current situation. ako nakalimut nako unsa to specifically nga mga agreements ato na-sign with america in the past (we discussed them in high school), pero i do remember nga daghan kaayo injustices nahimu ang US sa ato sa una (nga naka-ingun nganong ingun ani ta karun), not only in 1898 when america came to our shores in the guise of saving us from the spaniards when we already have defeated the spaniards then, and took away our liberty. not only during the filipino-american war when they massacred thousands of our men, women, and children, because they took us for "bandits" and "thieves". but also the numerous economic "deals" they thrusted upon us to exploit our resources and make us dependent on it. they even claimed they granted us our independence. what a joke! independence is *not* granted. it is won, and *we did* in 1898 during the revolution with spain, only that it was snatched away from us. and we say nationalism has brought us our present perils! there can never be a more perverted idea than that. nationalism strives for independence, for development and progress through self-sufficiency and hard work. if only we really strove for nationalism, for independence, believed in ourselves and not begged from others, ni-develop na unta ta. like i said, let's look at our asian neighbors. kita na siguro ang pinaka-luoy karun in terms of economic development. unsa ma'y naa nila nga wala nato? it can't be the system of government, it can't be because we have "too much" of democracy, as mahathir of malaysia pointed out. malaysia have an authoritarian type of government and they have prospered, so has singapore, with lee kwan yew's "iron-fisted" rule. but what about those countries who *don't* have authoritarian governments? why have they prospered also? it can't be the type of government. what those countries have in common is a great sense of "nationalism", or basically, love for their country. pareha sa south korea. if you remember that article someone here posted in this thread earlier, south korea before was very poor, it was greatly ravaged by war. but the people in that country *loved* their country, to the point wherein they were willing to do anything for their country, to sacrifice their personal good for the greater good of their country; they resolved to prosper, so they did. mao sad na sa singapore. it's not their system of government. it's the people's love for their country. and vietnam, too. not too long ago grabe kaayo na ka-ravaged ang vietnam (thanks to the US), pero karun dako na sila ug development. love for country, independence, hard work through one's effort, that's what these countries have in common.
mao jud. america is (at least partly) to be blamed for our situation (particularly the economic one), ato na hinuon ihatag atong kaugalingun didto nila?Originally Posted by gareb
mu-intervene lang na ang US kung naa sila'y dako kaayo nga benefit nga makuha sa ana nga action. like for example, oil.Originally Posted by LytSlpr
wala man ta'y oil nga ma-exploit sa ilang mga giant oil companies. ug tan-awa, the US went so far as to ignore the United Nations, violate international rules, concoct all sorts of "evidence" of weapons of mass destruction para lang ma-control niya ang huge reserves of oil didto nga region sa Mid-East. so that's one example of the US being driven mainly, if not solely, by economic and strategic interests. it's indeed laughable the idea that the US would save us from our miseries and adopt us, as if it's welling-up with good intentions.
It will never happen kung defeatist kaayo atong attitude. This, again, is where we differ. You are so pessimistic, EZRA, while Gareb and I are optimistic.Originally Posted by EZRA
![]()
Nakasabot ra ko bai.Originally Posted by EZRA
A lot of us Pinoys think that way already. There's really a dearth of opportunities here. Dili kaayo secure imong future kung diri ka magtrabaho o mag-raise ug family. Ang ako lang gi-ask is that we be a little hopeful for our country. Because this requires man jud a lot of self-sacrifice. And I know, and it's only understandable, that people would think first of their own good and last only of their country's. But if we really want to improve this country, we have to learn to sacrifice. Mao lagi na nga heroic na na nga act ang pag-stay diri, ang pag-invest diri, ang pag-trust nato sa ato country. Murag people right now don't find heroism to be their calling.
Well, I wish you all the best.Originally Posted by EZRA
Maayo lang unta kung naa pay mabilin diri sa atoa para mu-work for changes. Maybe if you have enough money you can come back here and invest. Maybe create a business para maka-provide ka ug jobs.
Again, we have to be optimistic.Originally Posted by EZRA
Confident kaayo ka, huh?Originally Posted by EZRA
Seriously, we really have to be optimistic. Me, I'm positive that change will come as long as people are determined to change things (I don't know kung 5, 10, 20 years from now, or beyond, pero it will come). Daghan pa man taw dire nga maayo. Mga civil societies, NGOs, etc., who are working for changes one step at a time.
Lisud na da. No, I don't have kids, single pa ko. I'll stay single usa while things don't look so certain pa. Like I said, sacrifice usa ta. If things don't get any better many years from now, I don't know lang if willing pa ba ko mu-himu ug sacrifices.Originally Posted by EZRA



wala man ta'y oil nga ma-exploit sa ilang mga giant oil companies. ug tan-awa, the US went so far as to ignore the United Nations, violate international rules, concoct all sorts of "evidence" of weapons of mass destruction para lang ma-control niya ang huge reserves of oil didto nga region sa Mid-East. so that's one example of the US being driven mainly, if not solely, by economic and strategic interests. it's indeed laughable the idea that the US would save us from our miseries and adopt us, as if it's welling-up with good intentions.
Reply With Quote
however, the statement following that is so true. it is our duty, having seen and learned well from the past lessons, to change that. no one will do it for us without conditions.
Who's backing these people?? ... who are you gonna vote for? Would a positive change happen in the next administration?