Do you believe in God? If so/if no, WHY?

[babygin2005]

---

I was once tought to believe in everything i see. I havent seen God but my mom told me that i should believe in Him. I may not see Him, but He watches over me as i grow up.

Now that im fully grown, i dont just believe in Him, my faith is stronger now.

Just remember guys, religion wont save you, its your faith

we're not talking about religion here..yes your correct... but lemme add a word---> its our faith in GOD that will save us...

[arice]

i do

i've been raised up to believe in him
naa lagi chances na mo doubt ko about him, but after reflections and realizations kai it only helps me to have more faith in him

[babygin2005]

u sure na dli ka mo question sa existance ni GOD? eventhough naa na tanan kamalasan sa imong life dli ghapon ka mo Q sa iyang existance?

depende man na kung u think kanang mga dimalas nga nahitabu sa imung life kay wrath ni God nimu or will ni God? naa bya tay freewill...tingali ikaw ray nag cause anang mga kamalasan sa imung life...ayaw ipanangil ni God...sorry...just love Him so much...

[cutycute]

frankly speaking noh as of now kay atheist man ko.. ambot lang uy.. kasab-an gani ko mom nako...

abi kaha nimu nga sikat ka kung atheist ka...naa man gud uban diha...mag pa atheist2x kunuhay arun ingnun...hahay...sorry kaayu LOrd, naglagut napud ko...

[cutycute]

ok smarty i've done googling it..but do you have a proof of the veracity of that quote??..if u can give me a site that presents Antonio Pigafetta's chronicles stating exactly the words/sentence of Magellan's quote then i would bow on u and say [*all hail lady genius*]..if u have skip history class and doesnt know who PIG-A-FETTA is then i'll tell u now that he was the official spanish CHRONICLER of magellans expedition and if ever Magellan muttered such damned quote then only thru Pigafetta could account for it...

Now my point here is Christianity had been falsely blamed of the-earth-is-flat theories..and there was this no-basis Magellan quote that leds atheist to just jump into the bandwagon of screaming liars who were voicing there lungs out that Magellan said it so.....

Http: //www.christiananswers.net/q-aig/aig-c034.html

yahooo!!! correct corect!!

[cutycute]

am i assuming or are you? did i put words into your mouth? i'm sorry...which part...and btw, why would i be interested in YOU and whatever's below your belt...i already said my piece...

let's skim through this thread, shall we?...page 3...sept 22 and sept 27...you already posted your stance on this topic, right?

oh no...wait...you came back right after a few exchange of postings between me and tolstoi on nov. 7...with an "OT: you don't have to speak out of your lungs for somebody/something that you don't believe in... blah blah blah"...and that was supposedly a "general" opinion on the topic you already had an opinion on? and may i ask what is your definition of "speaking out of your lungs" in a discussion board? i'm sorry, please enlighten me.

if you TRULY don't give a damn, why bother making a general comment on those who doesn't believe in your god? i mean, really.

hala kulasa...grabeh kaayu ka...sagdi lang someday makarealize raka...nya post nya balik diri ha..kung marenew naka...iampo jud taka ug maayu day...

[regnauld]

I believe in Him because my faith tells me to believe in Him.

HI lolo Einstein! Thank you lolo for your brilliant ideas about the Law of Relativity and the GOD who doesn't play dice in the universe!

[The_Child]

I am not boasting sire but rather for me it makes sense as I study his work and i'm still studying it little by little!

yes, you were. if it made sense to you, then you would have understood it already. but anyways, no use of arguing. Goedel's initiative to prove God is a rehash of old things only that he uses modern invention to present his claim - modal logic the goal of which is to logically determine on regards to the possibility, probability and necessity of an entity, whether in philosophy or in computer science and in other fields in math.

the attempt of goedel is nothing new. Although he uses new methods, he continues to commit the same mistake ever since the enlightenment period, that is, in matters of God, immortality and the Soul it will always be beyond Reason to grasp and by reason, logic is implied since it is its categories.

Somebody doing Goedel would also realize one of this greatest contribution is his "incompleteness theorem" what is it? google nalang.

[regnauld]

yes, you were. if it made sense to you, then you would have understood it already. but anyways, no use of arguing. Goedel's initiative to prove God is a rehash of old things only that he uses modern invention to present his claim - modal logic the goal of which is to logically determine on regards to the possibility, probability and necessity of an entity, whether in philosophy or in computer science and in other fields in math.

the attempt of goedel is nothing new. Although he uses new methods, he continues to commit the same mistake ever since the enlightenment period, that is, in matters of God, immortality and the Soul it will always be beyond Reason to grasp and by reason, logic is implied since it is its categories.

Somebody doing Goedel would also realize one of this greatest contribution is his "incompleteness theorem" what is it? google nalang.

Yes you have a point.

I'm not saying that Goedel has proved everything absolutely about GOD coz that would be insanity.NO one can do it. Even St. Thomas Aquinas proof about the existence of GOD is not absolute but only partial which is based on FAITH and REASON using Aristotelian Logic.

[KASAAC]

I was raised to believe Him and so I do.
I haven't seen God, nor touch and spoke to Him eye to eye.
Nevertheless, there are circumstances in my life at one point, I felt His presence.
I can stand and testify His existence.