Air Marshal Kills Passenger, Citing Threat

[tolstoi]

---

...the blame should be imparted on the airport/customs officials also why they admitted to board a bipolar patient..they should have made necessary precautions knowing that their was an unsound passenger on their flight manifest.

[PissKhanXXX]

The only thing that bothers me there is no unanimous agreement among those inside the plane whether the guy yelled he had a bomb or not (which is kind of weird because what kind of terrorist yells that he has a bomb, don’t they just pull the trigger).

depende...

if all they want is to light up the sky with a passenger jet filled with people, they can just detonate the bomb without saying a word. however, if they want to have some demands met and have the bad guys stand on their toes, they could declare bomb threats and the like, and hold the whole aircraft hostage.

[darkwing]

...the blame should be imparted on the airport/customs officials also why they admitted to board a bipolar patient..they should have made necessary precautions knowing that their was an unsound passenger on their flight manifest.

basin wala gi-declare sa wife nga naa ingana nga condition...

[SPRINGFIELD_XD_40]

As to what I said on my earlier replies , dali ra kaau na ma USAB ang storya because gobyerno ang ka atbang nimo . LAWSUITS here and there ..... BUANG ba gud ang AIR MARSHALLS mo pusil for no apparent reasons at all ? I therefor conclude na POSITIVE gyud na ni declare ang victim of possession of a bomb . There are other means of NON LETHAL ways that can be applied to TERRORIST that depends on the situation ie SHARP OBJECTS , PEN GUNS , blades . BOMB is a word associated to TERRORIST and Uncle Sam is zero tolerance on TERRORIST or someone who claims to be one . It reminds me of a bumper sticker I saw the other day .... the TERRORIST's boxcutter versus my 1911 ? Hehehe ....

[Minuano27]

if he was on the plane, and he was supposed to have a bomb...but how was he able to board the plane with a bomb in the first place?

[SPRINGFIELD_XD_40]

if he was on the plane, and he was supposed to have a bomb...but how was he able to board the plane with a bomb in the first place?

The reports clearly states that he was frantically running around claiming to have a BOMB in his backpack ... he was asked to settle down and cooperate but he didnt and to the point of reaching something in his backpack was the moment he was immobilized . Like I said , TERRORIST and CLAIMING to be ONE has no room in any of Uncle Sams jurisdiction .... the latter represented the victim , according to the reports though .

By cursing the plane attendants , demanding something , arguing etc can get u into trouble , how much more running around claiming of such possession ?