Is Evolutionist Science worth believing?

[munzter666]

---

If we came from monkeys, why is it there are still plenty of monkeys today?

gaan piso makatubag ana.

80 plus pages...and still asking the same silly question. why dont you do us a favor and do your part...READ.

[Mortred KunaiSpinner]

Bro. I think wala man cguroi qualm about one's belief in Religion and one's belief in Evolution.

I think evolution is how God (If ever he exist) made us and the universe. So what about the credibility of the Bible? Amidst what people say, Genesis and Evolution are really compatible.

Genesis teach that God made the world in a form of a process (6 days). Dli ba ni the same as with evolution? Evolution teaches that human evolved from primitive forms of life and it took millions of mutations and processes before a bacteria became a man.

Kai ning sulti man ang Bible ug 6 days ug ang evolution ug millions of years gubot na diay sunod?

Ug nag tuo mo na makasabot ang mga tao sauna katong panahon ni Abraham ug "Natural Selection"? Hah storya2x ka ana nila dli ba ka sunogon?


If we view that God made us in his likeness then it is only natural to conclude that he also give us reason. Thus, God gave us the gift of reason and our reason developed science. Evolution is a theory in Science so let Science be the one to explain it. Religion deals with faith so please don't let Religion be your reason to debunk evolution. Gamita ug Science.

And also about Science... Science is not enough to explain all of the world, kulang pa. Matod pa sa akong Physics teacher sa college, science is in league with change and since change is absolute then there would be no point now or in the future where science could really, really, really, really, really explain everything. So going back, evolution can not be used to debunk Genesis kai dli mana niya territoryo. Evolution belongs to science.

So about sa question... Evolutionist Science worth believing?

Yes it is. It is good science and since we have the gift of reason, let us continue to unravel it.

Btw, (Atot dli ma off ang bold!) the late Pope John Paul II even said that Evolution is actually compatible with Christianity...

[regnauld]

Bro. I think wala man cguroi qualm about one's belief in Religion and one's belief in Evolution.

I think evolution is how God (If ever he exist) made us and the universe. So what about the credibility of the Bible? Amidst what people say, Genesis and Evolution are really compatible.

Genesis teach that God made the world in a form of a process (6 days). Dli ba ni the same as with evolution? Evolution teaches that human evolved from primitive forms of life and it took millions of mutations and processes before a bacteria became a man.

Kai ning sulti man ang Bible ug 6 days ug ang evolution ug millions of years gubot na diay sunod?

Ug nag tuo mo na makasabot ang mga tao sauna katong panahon ni Abraham ug "Natural Selection"? Hah storya2x ka ana nila dli ba ka sunogon?

If we view that God made us in his likeness then it is only natural to conclude that he also give us reason. Thus, God gave us the gift of reason and our reason developed science. Evolution is a theory in Science so let Science be the one to explain it. Religion deals with faith so please don't let Religion be your reason to debunk evolution. Gamita ug Science.

And also about Science... Science is not enough to explain all of the world, kulang pa. Matod pa sa akong Physics teacher sa college, science is in league with change and since change is absolute then there would be no point now or in the future where science could really, really, really, really, really explain everything. So going back, evolution can not be used to debunk Genesis kai dli mana niya territoryo. Evolution belongs to science.

So about sa question... Evolutionist Science worth believing?

Yes it is. It is good science and since we have the gift of reason, let us continue to unravel it.

Btw, (Atot dli ma off ang bold!) the late Pope John Paul II even said that Evolution is actually compatible with Christianity...

Yes! Evolution is compatible with Christianity because there are priests like Fr. Tiielhard de Chardin who wrote about physical, mental and spiritual evolution of man!

[grovestreet]

murag mas insulto sa mga unggoy nga related sila sa humans.

[diehard96]

murag mas insulto sa mga unggoy nga related sila sa humans.

sila man ang mas advanced ang evolution so ok ra daw nila. mosabot ra sila sa pagka primitive sa mga tao

bitaw, kun mo abot ni chardin ang storya, unsa man gyud diay nga klase sa evolution ang gi storyahan diri? ang biological evolution naay pwerteng daghanang circumstantial evidence, pero kay di man dogmatic ang science maong way mga fanatics nga evolutionary biologists (di pareha sa religion diha nga mosugot mag pinatyanay ang uban para lang gyud di matarog ang ilang gi tuohan).

social evolution is an established fact, experienced directly by people (sometimes drastic social changes happen within their lifetimes) and documented by history.

[Mortred KunaiSpinner]

(di pareha sa religion diha nga mosugot mag pinatyanay ang uban para lang gyud di matarog ang ilang gi tuohan).

Chipshot mani imo gi himo sa religion bro. Murag Generalization ra ni imo gi buhat. Wla cguroi true relihiyon na ing ana oi. Ang mobohat ra man ug ingana kai mga Religious Fundamentalists ra man ug mao mani ang nakapait man gud.

Religious Fundamentalists would really want to tell the whole world that they are correct and everybody is wrong and they even thread on waters that they should not even thread like in Science.

Kung tarong man lng tanang tawo dri, theist or atheist, den der would be no debate about the Science behind Evolution because it is good science.

[regnauld]

Chipshot mani imo gi himo sa religion bro. Murag Generalization ra ni imo gi buhat. Wla cguroi true relihiyon na ing ana oi. Ang mobohat ra man ug ingana kai mga Religious Fundamentalists ra man ug mao mani ang nakapait man gud.

Religious Fundamentalists would really want to tell the whole world that they are correct and everybody is wrong and they even thread on waters that they should not even thread like in Science.

Kung tarong man lng tanang tawo dri, theist or atheist, den der would be no debate about the Science behind Evolution because it is good science.

Absolutely! I pity the bible fanatics who say that the BIBLE ALONE is the SOURCE of TRUTH and rejects all sacred books that contain TRUTHS too!

[diehard96]

Chipshot mani imo gi himo sa religion bro. Murag Generalization ra ni imo gi buhat. Wla cguroi true relihiyon na ing ana oi. Ang mobohat ra man ug ingana kai mga Religious Fundamentalists ra man ug mao mani ang nakapait man gud.

Religious Fundamentalists would really want to tell the whole world that they are correct and everybody is wrong and they even thread on waters that they should not even thread like in Science.

aw cge:

di pareha sa mga religious fundamentalists diha nga makig pinatyanay para lang pag defend sa ilang pagtuo.

way labot ang kadtong wa motuo nga ang religion nag tudlo og "absolute truths."

[SioDenz]

Absolutely! I pity the bible fanatics who say that the BIBLE ALONE is the SOURCE of TRUTH and rejects all sacred books that contain TRUTHS too!

Unsa lagi na truth? religious truth? truth of salvation? i specific daw kay daghan klase an truth...

[SioDenz]

aw cge:

di pareha sa mga religious fundamentalists diha nga makig pinatyanay para lang pag defend sa ilang pagtuo.

way labot ang kadtong wa motuo nga ang religion nag tudlo og "absolute truths."

Naa diay dili absolute na truth? sample daw...