Do you believe in Reincarnation?

[k.A.i]

---

I just remember what Jesus The Christ said:- "Never give what is holy to dogs or throw your pearls before pigs. Otherwise, they will trample them with their feet and then turn around and attack you." Matthew 7:6

wahehehe

butangi sad ug interpretation kung pede para dali ra masabtan
lahi akong pagsabot ana


sige na reg,
e-prove na nato once and for all,
mutuo man kaha kag reincarnation

wahehehe

[Gray_Fox]

sagdi nlang na bro.. wa na kasabot sa iyang gi storya.

I just remember what Jesus The Christ said:- "Never give what is holy to dogs or throw your pearls before pigs. Otherwise, they will trample them with their feet and then turn around and attack you." Matthew 7:6

tan-awa.. ingon cya nga dli daw source of truth ang bible but dd2 cya nag base sa iyang reply. dli sad cya libog ug utok wui. hehehe

[k.A.i]

sagdi nlang na bro.. wa na kasabot sa iyang gi storya.



tan-awa.. ingon cya nga dli daw source of truth ang bible but dd2 cya nag base sa iyang reply. dli sad cya libog ug utok wui. hehehe

mao gani galibog sad ko niya,
ana man siguro na mga maayong laki

and murag gospel ni matthew man sad to ang iyang gi ingon nga naay contradiction?


ana man na mga maayong laki, para lang naay matubag ba
theosophist nga buddhism pa jud
nya mutoo ug ginoo

[regnauld]

wahehehe

butangi sad ug interpretation kung pede para dali ra masabtan
lahi akong pagsabot ana


sige na reg,
e-prove na nato once and for all,
mutuo man kaha kag reincarnation

wahehehe

The Principle: Casting Pearls Before Swine

"Do not give what is holy to dogs, and do not throw pearls before swine, lest they trample them under their feet, and turn and tear you to pieces." (Matthew 7:6).

Of course, these words of Jesus are allegorical. I doubt that any were literally casting pearls before swine. The meaning is pretty simple to figure out; "Do not persist in offering what is sacred or of value to those who have no appreciation for it, because your gift will not only become contaminated and be despised, your generous efforts could also be rebuffed and perhaps even openly attacked."

[Red.Emano]

1.
asa ka school bai?
nothing can be proven through evidence? wahahaha
science can be proven through evidence and can be disproven without proper evidence/by contradiction,
thats what i know , tingali lahi to nga subject imong nasudlan?

2. ya, for those esoteric blah blah.
pero ang gibuhat ni regnauld kay murag iyang gipugos sa mga reader nga hes telling the truth

3. ya, only those


and BTW,
dili mana mao akong ge-question bai,
mura man sad kag si reg nga machange topic

I graduated from respected universities here in the Philippines my motherland.
You did not comprehend what I said. It is through experiments and proofs merely disprove.
Here's the thing: If you had the hypothesis "THERE'S NO SUCH THING AS BLACK SWANS". And now, you go all around the world in search for every swan. If you FOUND NO black swan, would you say that there's no such thing as a black swan? No! That's insane! You haven't found EVIDENCE to DISPROVE your HYPOTHESIS. Go around the world again, if you found a black swan then that is the time when you have disproven your hypothesis. Your PROOF which is the BLACK SWAN disproves your hypothesis. Do you comprehend mammal?

Don't ever try to question my integrity as an academician and scholar because you will only frown on your own false pride. Try to contemplate, have I been asking someone to draw blood from stone? Or, have I asked the right questions?

am not murag regnauld. My forum name is my name. I don't even personally know him. But if our views may coincide, that would mean we atleast have made an indepth study of the subject and know a thing or 2 about it. Easy to ask, but not easy to comprehend especially for you.

wala nako gi change ang topic in the first place kay wala man ko sa lugar mag disprove or prove. swerte kaayu ka kay e prove lang namo sa imo diha diha dayon. Unya kami? Sigeg tuon, dugay kaayo mi naka realize sa truth ani.

[regnauld]

sagdi nlang na bro.. wa na kasabot sa iyang gi storya.



tan-awa.. ingon cya nga dli daw source of truth ang bible but dd2 cya nag base sa iyang reply. dli sad cya libog ug utok wui. hehehe

Did I say that? I think you have to read the thread "The Only Source of Truth? " What I said was The Bible IS NOT THE ONLY SOURCE OF TRUTH. Gets?

[k.A.i]

I graduated from respected universities here in the Philippines my motherland.
You did not comprehend what I said. It is through experiments and proofs merely disprove.
Here's the thing: If you had the hypothesis "THERE'S NO SUCH THING AS BLACK SWANS". And now, you go all around the world in search for every swan. If you FOUND NO black swan, would you say that there's no such thing as a black swan? No! That's insane! You haven't found EVIDENCE to DISPROVE your HYPOTHESIS. Go around the world again, if you found a black swan then that is the time when you have disproven your hypothesis. Your PROOF which is the BLACK SWAN disproves your hypothesis. Do you comprehend mammal?

Don't ever try to question my integrity as an academician and scholar because you will only frown on your own false pride. Try to contemplate, have I been asking someone to draw blood from stone? Or, have I asked the right questions?

am not murag regnauld. My forum name is my name. I don't even personally know him. But if our views may coincide, that would mean we atleast have made an indepth study of the subject and know a thing or 2 about it. Easy to ask, but not easy to comprehend especially for you.

nindot lagi kag school, ang problema ikaw man,

basaha ug tarong akong akong gipost kanang #1
proof can be proven by evidence and proof/theory can be disproven by contradicting it.

ahay,
tingalig english to nga subject imong nasudlan bai?

scholar?
ahay, unsay labot nako?
dili da best akong school and im not a scholar,
pero i know the basics about life

[k.A.i]

Did I say that? I think you have to read the thread "The Only Source of Truth? " What I said was The Bible IS NOT THE ONLY SOURCE OF TRUTH. Gets?

bai reg,

theosophist man ka nga practicing buddhism noh?

nya mutoo kag ginoo?

[Red.Emano]

utro pa sad diay ka Kai. Mao gani gitawag ni ug ISTORYA.NET ; para ra ni pampalipas oras. Kung gusto nimo ma change imong tinuhuan, pag tuon under sa TS o patudlo ni regnauld. pay eyeball mo kung interesado gyud ka.

the truth must be experienced first hand. DILI: THE TRUTH MUST BE ASKED FROM SOMEONE AND HE/SHE MUST ANSWER ME LIKE INSTANT NOODLES. Ikaw ang problema, dili kami. Mao gyud ni ang tinood. Post ni para sa mga naka encounter sa reincarnation, dili ni post para sa hala nga nga portion.

[Gray_Fox]

Did I say that? I think you have to read the thread "The Only Source of Truth? " What I said was The Bible IS NOT THE ONLY SOURCE OF TRUTH. Gets?

ayaw nlang ta bro... the way you post in both threads (The Bible IS NOT THE ONLY SOURCE OF TRUTH & Go to first new post Bible Contradictions, Errors: Bible is Full of Contradictions & Errors) indicate that the bible is not reliable and inaccurate.

pde dli nlang ka mo lusot ug mo ankon nlang nga sayop ka para madali? taas na kaau ang posts ani nga thread o nya denial japon ka....