hahaha. sir regnauld, i give you a salutation befitting your qualifications ("sir"), and you mock me with ridiculous/outrageous salutation ("professor"). very responsible of you sir. first and foremost, did i say that no university offers metaphysics? could you quote that sir? i believe i said
no university offers REINCARNATION SCIENCE because it is not scientific in the first place.
spiritual science is an oxy***** sir. science is the study of the physical aspect of the world.
science, by definition sir, is any system of knowledge
that is concerned with the physical world and its phenomena and that entails unbiased observations and systematic experimentation. In general, a science involves a pursuit of knowledge covering general truths or the operations of fundamental laws. science "measures".
YOU MIGHT WANT TO STUDY THIS LINK PROFESSOR! The Origins of Natural Science, GA# 326 by Rudolf Steiner, A Spiritual Science ARJ2 Review by Bobby Matherne
trust, is more inclined to FAITH rather than SCIENCE. get your ideas straight sir. bible scholar? haha. you don't know what degrees i have achieved sir, yet your immature mind concludes such?
very far fetched sir. i never asked for the meaning of psychology.
again, "theories", not "laws". is that so hard to comprehend?
i'm very sorry sir, you seemed pretty confident, i thought you knew what you were saying. forgive me for having expected much from you.
so are they more credible than most physicists in the scientific community?
having lots of evidences is useless unless the entire scientific community accepts this evidences. in a court case, having numerous evidences against a person neither acquits or convicts him. having CREDIBLE AND ACCEPTED EVIDENCES do.
did i say that human consciousness do not exist? please quote that part sir.
CONCLUSION:
reincarnation is a belief that some essential part of a living being (in some variations only human beings) survives death to be reborn in a new body. a BELIEF. reincarnation was NEVER a science. again, to repeat, a BELIEF. i have nothing against people with such beliefs, for who am i to judge. it may be factual, or maybe fictional, but to put it irresponsibly as an inarguable
scientific fact, well, that's incorrect in every sense.
there is nothing more to argue here. I REST MY CASE.
cheers.