Page 6 of 6 FirstFirst ... 3456
Results 51 to 54 of 54
  1. #51
    Infractions: 0/3 (6)
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Gender
    Male
    Posts
    7,290

    Cell Phone Towers: How Far is Safe?
    by Taraka Serrano

    If you or people you know live within a quarter mile of a cell phone tower, this may be of concern. Two studies, one in Germany and the other in Israel, reveal that living in proximity of a cell phone tower or antenna could put your health at significant risk.

    German study: 3 times increased cancer risk

    Several doctors living in Southern Germany city of Naila conducted a study to assess the risk of mobile phone radiation. Their researh examined whether population living close to two transmitter antennas installed in 1993 and 1997 in Naila had increased risk of cancer.

    Data was gathered from nearly 1,000 patients who had been residing at the same address during the entire observation period of 10 years. The social differences are small, with no ethnic diversity. There is no heavy industry, and in the inner area there are neither high voltage cable nor electric trains. The average ages of the residents are similar in both the inner and outer areas.

    What they found is quite telling: the proportion of newly developed cancer cases was three times higher among those who had lived during the past ten years at a distance of up to 400m (about 1300 feet) from the cellular transmitter site, compared to those living further away. They also revealed that the patients fell ill on average 8 years earlier.

    Computer simulation and measurements used in the study both show that radiation in the inner area (within 400m) is 100 times higher compared to the outer area, mainly due to additional emissions coming from the secondary lobes of the transmitter.

    Looking at only the first 5 years, there was no significant increased risk of getting cancer in the inner area. However, for the period 1999 to 2004, the odds ratio for getting cancer was 3.38 in the inner area compared to the outer area. Breast cancer topped the list, with an average age of 50.8 year compared with 69.9 years in the outer area, but cancers of the prostate, pancreas, bowel, skin melanoma, lung and blood cancer were all increased.

    Israel study: fourfold cancer risk

    Another study, this one from Israel's Tel Aviv University, examined 622 people living near a cell-phone transmitter station for 3-7 years who were patients in one clinic in Netanya and compared them against 1,222 control patients from a nearby clinic. Participants were very closely matched in environment, workplace and occupational characteristics. The people in the first group live within a half circle of 350m (1148 feet) radius from the transmitter, which came into service in July 1996.

    The results were startling. Out of the 622 exposed patients, 8 cases of different kinds of cancer were diagnosed in a period of just one year (July 1997 to June 199: 3 cases of breast cancer, one of ovarian cancer, lung cancer, Hodgkin's disease (cancer of the lymphatic system), osteoid osteoma (bone tumour) and kidney cancer. This compares with 2 per 1 222 in the matched controls of the nearby clinic. The relative risk of cancer was 4.15 for those living near the cell-phone transmitter compared with the entire population of Israel.

    Women were more susceptible. As seven out of eight cancer cases were women, the relative cancer rates for females were 10.5 for those living near the transmitter station and 0.6 for the controls relative for the whole town of Netanya. One year after the close of the study, 8 new cases of cancer were diagnosed in the microwave exposed area and two in the control area.

    What to Do If You Live Near a Cell Phone Transmitter

    Short of relocating, there are some things you can do to fight the effects of electromagnetic radiation (EMR). The Safe Wireless Initiative of the Science and Public Policy Institute in Washington, DC, outlines three levels of intervention in accordance with the public health paradigm that everyone can apply. Here are our suggestions based on these guidelines:

    The primary means of intervention is through avoidance or minimizing exposure. This simply means to avoid contact with EMR as much as possible. In case of a cell phone tower close to your home, this could mean using specially formulated RF shield paint, shielding fabric, shielding glass or film for windows, etc. Although they may sound extreme, these measures are a life-saver for someone who suffers from electrosensitivity, a condition in which a person experiences physical symptoms aggravated by electromagnetic fields. (Sweden is the only country so far that recognizes electrosensitivity as a real medical condition, and their government pays for measures to reduce exposure in their homes and workplaces).

    The secondary means of intervention is to minimize the effects of exposure. This includes the use of bioenergetic devices that help reduce the effects of EMR, such as pendants, chips or other devices designed to strengthen the biofield of the individual. A biofield is the matrix of weak electromagnetic signals that the body's cells use to communicate with each other. EMR disrupts these signals, causing the cells to eventually shut down and result in build up of toxins and waste products within the cells, including free radicals known to result in cellular dysfunction and interference with DNA repair. A scientifically validated bioenergetic device restores intercellular communications and normal cellular function by strengthening the biofield against the effects of EMR.

    The third means of intervention is to help reverse damage caused by exposure.This includes nutritional support such as anti-oxidant supplementation, particularly helpful in countering the effects of free radicals. Supplementing with anti-oxidants SOD, catalase, glutathione, and Coq10 are especially recommended. Microwave radiation has been shown to decrease levels of these anti-oxidants that the body normally produces to protect itself. These levels are sensitive indicators in stress, aging, infections and various other disease states.

    Source: Cell Phone Towers: How Far is Safe? - EMF-Health.com

    --------

    But since we live in the Philippines, don't expect too much. You better live with it.

  2. #52
    C.I.A.
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Gender
    Male
    Posts
    5,791
    Blog Entries
    3
    Quote Originally Posted by IT View Post
    delikado sa mga babae buntis and also sa mga lalaki ( maka ba-og )
    How true is this? Kuyawa ani oi naa rba cellsite duol sa amo. Ma wise guy ta ani kalakiha (way sud ang lagay) hehehe

  3. #53
    the amount of radiation emitted by cell sites is too low to affect the human body to cause cancer etc. The signal strenght is regulated by ITU-T standards to make sure its not harmfull in normal cases. Mas kusog pa ang radiation emitted by Medical X-rays mao nga only have one x-ray in 6 months.

  4. #54
    QUOTE:
    Cellular phone towers, like cellular phones themselves, are a relatively new technology, and we do not yet have full information on health effects. In particular, not enough time has elapsed to permit epidemiologic studies. There are some theoretical reasons why cellular phone towers would not be expected to increase cancer risk, and animal studies of RF have not suggested a risk of cancer. People who are concerned can ask for measurements of RF near cellular phone towers to be sure exposures do not exceed recommended limits. (The recommended exposure limits are in the range of .41-.45 milliwatts per square centimeter (mW/cm2) for cellular radiofrequencies.)

    The antenna itself is pointed at the horizon, not downward. so the bulk of the energy won't have much effect on the immediate vicinity of the tower. the maximum signal strenght is regulated by law to ensure the safety of the residents. the farther from the tower, the weaker the radio waves become. microwaves travel in a pretty straight line compared to lower frequency radio signals.

    the way the tower is constructed and the strenght of the antenna mounting should probably cause more concern than getting cancer from the radio waves. no one wants one of those things falling on your roof when a storm is raging. ^^

  5.    Advertisement

Page 6 of 6 FirstFirst ... 3456

Similar Threads

 
  1. effects of pills
    By andch81 in forum Fitness & Health
    Replies: 65
    Last Post: 07-29-2008, 11:41 AM
  2. Effects of FLUCTUATING ELECTRICITY on PC/electronics
    By MeMing in forum Computer Hardware
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 06-11-2008, 05:55 AM
  3. Kid on top of Napocor tower, shot and killed.
    By omad in forum Politics & Current Events
    Replies: 32
    Last Post: 09-27-2006, 06:32 PM
  4. wut are the effects of too much atiboitics?
    By r0mm3L in forum Fitness & Health
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 03-19-2006, 11:33 PM
  5. Invitation to: "Identifying and Healing the Effects of Child Abuse"
    By mannyamador in forum Politics & Current Events
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 06-30-2005, 02:41 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
about us
We are the first Cebu Online Media.

iSTORYA.NET is Cebu's Biggest, Southern Philippines' Most Active, and the Philippines' Strongest Online Community!
follow us
#top