Bible Contradictions, Errors: Bible is Full of Contradictions & Errors

[regnauld]

---

aw niingon pud diay ko na napildi ka?

lamia ikanta ug "desperado..." oi...hehehehehe!

don't be so desperate bro. ayaw pud pag binata. walay daog ug walay pildi diri...sharing ra ni
bro...

salamat my friend nga BIBLE SCHOLAR for enlightening my poor mind! Thank you for sharing your Brilliancy mr. BIBLE SCHOLAR!!!

[dartzed]

aw mamunga jud kintahay ug daghan pila gud ka million ka bata ang matawo kada adlaw. nya i brainwash dayon...hehehehe!

daghan diay mo bro? swak jud diay mo ani nga verse bro

Mat 7:13 Sumulod kamo sa pultahan nga masigpit, kay haluag ang pultahan ug halapad ang dalan nga nagahatud ngadto sa pagkalaglag; ug daghan ang mga nagasulod kaniya.

hahahaha nagpost nua cya ug lain topic nya naglikay cya sa iya giingon niangkon daw cya.. gidivert pa jud niya ug lain topic..

abi man nako muangkon.. mura man ta ani ug lastiko inat-inat or hatag bawi ba kaha.. hahaha

ad hominem jud...lolzzzzzzzzzzz

[Pein]

hahahaha nagpost nua cya ug lain topic nya naglikay cya sa iya giingon niangkon daw cya.. gidivert pa jud niya ug lain topic..

abi man nako muangkon.. mura man ta ani ug lastiko inat-inat or hatag bawi ba kaha.. hahaha

ad hominem jud...lolzzzzzzzzzzz

wala na nako gi divert bro. igo rako nisunod sa imong giingon kay niingon man gud ka:

well sorry to tell you but ang kahoy nga imo giexpect nga dautan is not really dautan ug namunga nua ug daghan, thats what you called reality sakto jud ka..

bcn imo mata ang dautan bro ky you cant accept the type of tree you want it to be..
tan.aw ragud kungfu panda daghan au ka makuha did2 pagtulun.an esp kana imo kahoy-kahoy sakto jud au na ky naa na did2..

so gitubag taka ana ug ing ani:

aw mamunga jud kintahay ug daghan pila gud ka million ka bata ang matawo kada adlaw. nya i brainwash dayon...hehehehe!

daghan diay mo bro? swak jud diay mo ani nga verse bro

Mat 7:13 Sumulod kamo sa pultahan nga masigpit, kay haluag ang pultahan ug halapad ang dalan nga nagahatud ngadto sa pagkalaglag; ug daghan ang mga nagasulod kaniya.

nilikay diay na nga gitabo man gani taka...

[dartzed]

wala na nako gi divert bro. igo rako nisunod sa imong giingon kay niingon man gud ka:



so gitubag taka ana ug ing ani:



nilikay diay na nga gitabo man gani taka...

hahaha aw ok ikaw gud nya asa nman imo post nga niangkon ka?.. wa man kaha ka mulikay...

[Pein]

hahaha aw ok ikaw gud nya asa nman imo post nga niangkon ka?.. wa man kaha ka mulikay...

brainwashing lagi ang amoa...wala diay ko muangkon ana? diba niingon man ko gabii among gi brainwash ang mga dautan para mabag o?

aw o brainwashing pud bro kung mao nay gusto nimo...ang usa ka dautan nga katoliko nga dili kayang mapa bag o sa ilang simbahan among gi brainwash para mahimong maayong tawo...

kay sa katoliko raba jud dili nila kaya nga mapa bag o ang ilang mga members...

ikaw bro niangkon ka?

hmmmmm...

[YellowSubmarine]

I have read from somewhere that most of the New Testament writers never met or saw Jesus in their lives. They lived many years after Jesus left the Earth. They wouldn't have known Jesus of Nazareth if they walked him on the street.

I beg to disagree.. NT writers are Mathew, Mark, Luke, John, Peter, Paul, James, Jude.. all but Paul are Jesus' Apostles

[seven_segment]

no such thing as contradicting...only our interpretations are contradicting...

[melvenb]

I dont know if this counts as a contradiction coz the verses are from old and new testament...

OLD Testament:
Deuteronomy 14:4-8 -"These are the animals which you may eat; the ox, (cattle) the sheep, the goat, the deer, the gazelle, the roebuck, the wild goat, the ibex, the antelope and the mountain sheep. And any animal that divides the hoof and has the hoof split in two and chews the cud, among the animals, that you may eat. Nevertheless, you are not to eat of these among which chew the cud, or among those that divide the hoof in two; the camel and the rabbit and the rock-badger, for though they chew the cud, they do not divide the hoof; they are unclean for you. And the pig, because it divides the hoof but does not chew the cud, it is unclean for you. You shall not eat any of their flesh nor touch their carcasses."

Therefore, di diay ta angay mokaon og mga "unclean animals".

NEW Testament
Matthew 15:11
"It is not what goes into the mouth that makes a person unclean. It is what comes out of the mouth that makes a person unclean."

Pero pwede ra diay ta mokaon og mga "unclean animal" kay dili man importante unsa'y mosulod, ang mogawas man diay ang mas importante.

[Pein]

I dont know if this counts as a contradiction coz the verses are from old and new testament...

OLD Testament:
Deuteronomy 14:4-8 -"These are the animals which you may eat; the ox, (cattle) the sheep, the goat, the deer, the gazelle, the roebuck, the wild goat, the ibex, the antelope and the mountain sheep. And any animal that divides the hoof and has the hoof split in two and chews the cud, among the animals, that you may eat. Nevertheless, you are not to eat of these among which chew the cud, or among those that divide the hoof in two; the camel and the rabbit and the rock-badger, for though they chew the cud, they do not divide the hoof; they are unclean for you. And the pig, because it divides the hoof but does not chew the cud, it is unclean for you. You shall not eat any of their flesh nor touch their carcasses."

Therefore, di diay ta angay mokaon og mga "unclean animals".

NEW Testament
Matthew 15:11
"It is not what goes into the mouth that makes a person unclean. It is what comes out of the mouth that makes a person unclean."

Pero pwede ra diay ta mokaon og mga "unclean animal" kay dili man importante unsa'y mosulod, ang mogawas man diay ang mas importante.

dili mana contradicting bro. sa una unclean, karon dili na...sa una dili pwede, karon pwede na...

[YellowSubmarine]

I dont know if this counts as a contradiction coz the verses are from old and new testament...

OLD Testament:
Deuteronomy 14:4-8 -"These are the animals which you may eat; the ox, (cattle) the sheep, the goat, the deer, the gazelle, the roebuck, the wild goat, the ibex, the antelope and the mountain sheep. And any animal that divides the hoof and has the hoof split in two and chews the cud, among the animals, that you may eat. Nevertheless, you are not to eat of these among which chew the cud, or among those that divide the hoof in two; the camel and the rabbit and the rock-badger, for though they chew the cud, they do not divide the hoof; they are unclean for you. And the pig, because it divides the hoof but does not chew the cud, it is unclean for you. You shall not eat any of their flesh nor touch their carcasses."

Therefore, di diay ta angay mokaon og mga "unclean animals".

NEW Testament
Matthew 15:11
"It is not what goes into the mouth that makes a person unclean. It is what comes out of the mouth that makes a person unclean."

Pero pwede ra diay ta mokaon og mga "unclean animal" kay dili man importante unsa'y mosulod, ang mogawas man diay ang mas importante.

in context the Law was given to the Jews.. sa NT it's not literal..