none of the above
adam and eve are fictional characters.
none of the above
adam and eve are fictional characters.
^^
correct. the story of adam and eve per se in the bible is not true. it's just fiction. it's actually just a creation story to portray the history of the Israelites because during that time that it was written, they were coming out/emerging as a nation.
Asus, naunsa ba ka oi. Mura man ug gahisgot tah panghitabo nga nahimu sulod sa 10 years, thousands or million of years kaha na. Unsa nman lan nang "Natural adaptation" sa science bro, na explain nman nah nga naa jud changes depende sa environment. Ug naay kaluha na bata, an isa magdako sa states nya an isa magdako sa Afrika, after 20 years, mapariha kaha na sila ug pamanit? how much more if ila mga offspring for next generation for thousands of years?
- pero sakto sad ka nga ni evolve an tawo, Pero gkan sa tawo ra ghapon, na usab lan iya Physical appearance ug Dili ni Evolve gkan sa Single cell organism
- Pero proof ani bro is an atu DNA, di ba na prove na sa Science nga same ra jud tah DNA strand tanan tawo sa kalibutan? so its a proof na we came from the same Source.
- Paniti an Negro, Insik, ug Amerikano - di bah same ra tah Inside........hehe
none of the above man to sila adam and eve kay mga aliens man to sila.
do you believe on evolution? hasta bibliya mo-tuo ka?
wa ko kasabot nimo..
imo ba ipasabot nga ang negro manganak ug intsik?
o ang negro mahimo intsik kung dili pa-init?
dig deeper sa imo gi-ingon na physical change ra.
skin pigmentation is a complex thingy.
what do you mean na same ra ta inside?
no. of bones?
no of bones sa female is not = sa no of bones sa male.. d ko sure ani..
you're equating evolution to natural adaptation? maybe you're correct..
negro manganak ug intsik is another issue na sad..
Similar Threads |
|