first of all u made an argument that we are talking crap because of the uncertainty of our concerns
...and I just responded that there is no such thing as certain in this world...so whatever I do, whatever you do or others do contributes to the uncertainty in the world....even ur decision now...
I am sure will change tomorrow...which makes ur decision or u not certain. And that only Death and taxes is certain......I just cant imagine...u or Rama or Osmena to be certainly certain in everything.
Since uncertainty rules then it follows that ur argument is perfectly aligned to our side and the defect in ur logic is clear and plain.
I would rather say a " reminder " rather of arguments since I reacted to the notion that you and GODWHACKER are so firm with your sentiments though it is respected , naay kuwang which is the justification . The justification first came out by emphasizing MEDIA ... it was not actually MEDIA by core but also from personal point of views from te individual editors . To make it short , more profound ... HAKA-HAKA , BADMOUTHING and PROPAGANDA . The worst part is lately you guys decided to imply that " HUWATON " lang nato which is by nature ang inyohang pagka CERTAIN na UNCERTAIN na diay .
You sure ? If people are not CERTAIN , people cant FOCUS , nothing can be ACHIEVED ....and I just responded that there is no such thing as certain in this world...so whatever I do, whatever you do or others do contributes to the uncertainty in the world....even ur decision now...
I would like to know how you associated CERTAINTY to being a PUPPET . I didnt . I was talking about CERTAINTY about youI am sure will change tomorrow...which makes ur decision or u not certain. And that only Death and taxes is certain......I just cant imagine...u or Rama or Osmena to be certainly certain in everything.
LOL ... dont twist it . I was talking about you and GODWHAKCER as a PERSON , not with the SUBJECT which is TOMAS nd MIKE . To top it off ... I have no DOUBTS ... so actually I have my own lane and its you who are about to cross it and gets to align with it . In your previous replies , its full of DOUBT . You only said what you feel but with no substance at all .Since uncertainty rules then it follows that ur argument is perfectly aligned to our side and the defect in ur logic is clear and plain.
" A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. " - 2nd Amendment , Bill of Rights of the United States of America
Some interesting thoughts and how this reflects the current leadership of Mike.
Editorial: Master plan, other SRP needs
Saturday, December 13, 2008
IT would be interesting to find out how Cebu City Mayor Tomas Osmeņa would react to the views of a Japan International Cooperation Agency (Jica) representative on the manner the South Road Properties (SRP) is being managed.
If the one involved were another personality or entity, the mayor’s response would have been predictable: dismiss the suggestions and verbally lash back.
But Jica was the one that granted the 12.315-million yen loan that allowed the City to reclaim what is now the SRP and its views are critical in getting funding for the infrastructure support needed to make the area a viable investment haven.
The mayor cannot therefore afford to be harsh in his response especially now that the Filinvest plan to develop a big chunk of the SRP is being worked out.
Management
Two major flaws were pointed in the discussion with Jica and Asian Development Bank officials on the SRP: lack of a development framework or master plan for the area and lack of an organization or management structure, which is basically an overseer.
These flaws stem from the style of governance---virtually one-man rule---in the city and which has both been a boon and a bane, depending on the situation.
It is one thing for Osmeņa, for example, to be overly protective of the SRP, his pet project, and another to make the effort to develop the area and invite investors overly dependent on his whims and caprices and personal and political views and biases.
Response
The only guide in developing the SRP, and Jica’s Jun Watanabe admitted this, is the one in the mind of the mayor, and despite the role played by City Hall bureaucrats one can say that the SRP is virtually being managed by only one man, the mayor.
The SRP is not a sari-sari store but a major project of the city, one that is being paid for by people’s taxes and which has already drained City Hall’s finances, thus it should be run in a more professional manner and its development planned well.
Fortunately, it is not yet late to correct the two major flaws at this stage.
Note that per SPRINGFIELD, editorials like these are just but haka-hakas from the media. More if it is Sunstar. hehe.
Why not ? Specially if its owned by the GARCIAS ? Wake up lage !!
Why dont you post another one owned by the GULLAS's also ?
LOL ... like I said that is not SUNSTAR ... and even if its SUNSTAR who would really cared ? That articale came only from a mind of a single person , and that is the writer and could be the editor . SUNSTAR was only a tool and they think it is to their advantage because people relies on these kind of information . Well dili tanan and its so sad to say ang latter are those who really THINKS .
" A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. " - 2nd Amendment , Bill of Rights of the United States of America
^^^ bro bisan pag mo pahungaw ug opinion whatever inquirer, freeman or banat, it would still be useless kay for you this are all but haka -hakas. No amount of professionalism would justify their work as journalists/reporters because in your mind it is biased and tainted with lies and uncertainties.
Ang dili bias kato rang pabor sa imong idea kay they would be the first hand information. So para madali tang tanan dire ang atong tuho-an dire ang opinion lang ni SPRINGFIELD and whatever the media says is crap. hehe..
Wrong analogy there mate . Dungagan pa nimo ug BANAT NEWS ? LMFAO ... and now you want to talk about PROFESSIONALISM ?
IS that a given ? A FIRST HAND INFORMATION would be your best bet and its not even about being BIAS , its about the TRUTH . Now kay naa man ninyo ang bug-at ug kasakit sa dughan , kamo ang mo provide ug proof why RAMA indeed is a PUPPET . Previously man gud nabali , ako man ang palatagaon ninyo sa habol when in fact kamo ang ga DOUBT but then puro butlog , haka haka ang inyong gi sibya diri . Its doesnt mean wala ko ni respeto sa opinyon nimo pero dili na rason na mo tuo pod ko nimo . The only time you should say that also is when I am shoving it down to yor throat . Wala pa gani ko ni provide ug SOURCES kay SENTIDO KOMON ra ang gi gamit , how much more kaha if mo latag nako ?Ang dili bias kato rang pabor sa imong idea kay they would be the first hand information. So para madali tang tanan dire ang atong tuho-an dire ang opinion lang ni SPRINGFIELD and whatever the media says is crap. hehe..
ANg akko lang ... di ta magpataka ug kalat ug balita ... isnt this a forum ? Where people can share and exchange ideas but what happened here is dili ninyo madawat ang gi sulti nako . Di na nako problema ug inyoha na nah .
" A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. " - 2nd Amendment , Bill of Rights of the United States of America
Hehe. bro usapa nang imong sentido kumon kay kumon na kaayo na nimo nga excuse. Siguro ikaw ang natulog o gidaman kay nag cite lang ko ug mga sources nga at least dunay legitemacy kay sa imong personal lang nga opinyon o opinyon sa mga way klaro basta lang maka-ingon nga o kaila ko anang Mike okay na sya.
At least bro I am open to opinions from other parties who have their own reservations about Mike and based on their long time experience and being in the media duna sad na silay mga nahibal-an nganong naka-ingon sila ina. But para nimo haka-haka raman kaha so there's nothing to debate and argue here. Di man gani ka prove nga dili puppet si Mike kay ug nimo pa there's no need for you to prove. Usapa nalang nang imong sentido common kay ikaw ra man kahay convincing in your own closed world. hehe.
Similar Threads |
|