View Poll Results: Do we need this Bill?

Voters
694. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes

    530 76.37%
  • No

    164 23.63%
Page 46 of 747 FirstFirst ... 364344454647484956 ... LastLast
Results 451 to 460 of 7461
  1. #451

    Default

    What about the voices of those who are not part of the Church? THe people who think that this bill is beneficial to them? THose people who do not agree with the church? if you are gonna base it on surveys, 70% of catholics themselves are in favor of this bill, so says the surveys of course...

    Shouldn't the Catholic Church also listen to them as well?

  2. #452

    Default

    moral & spiritual guidance...

  3. #453

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by romantic_guy08 View Post
    What about the voices of those who are not part of the Church? THe people who think that this bill is beneficial to them? THose people who do not agree with the church? if you are gonna base it on surveys, 70% of catholics themselves are in favor of this bill, so says the surveys of course...

    Shouldn't the Catholic Church also listen to them as well?
    There has been false propaganda regarding the benefits of the bill.

    In my opinion, we don't have a population problem, we have a discipline problem. We have to take reponsibility on our work and environment.

  4. #454

    Default

    It is the role of the church to discipline the people. If everyone listens to the church, then we do not need this bill. But a lot of Catholics do not listen to the church, that's why we need this bill.

    Di gyud na angay ang simbahan mo blackmail, intimidate, o mamakak. Pila man ninyo nakadungog anang maka abort kuno bisan condom ra gigamit. Na-unsa man intawon.

    Kamo mga ginikanan kuno, syempre di gyud mo ganahan nga inyong mga anak nga 16 pa, dili na inosente. Pero mas dako gyud nang problema nga 16 pa, naa nay anak. Daghan masulti nganong di gyud sila angay mag-igat2 kung bata pa. Perti pa gyud ka daghan sa mga verses nga makuha sa Bibliya. Pero kung naminyo na inyong anak, 25 and above na ang edad, unya kamo nga lolo/lola nga batan-on nagtabang ug buhi kay daghan na gyud kaayo ang anak. Magpasalamat na lang gani siguro ang uban ani nila kung makahibal-an nga ga condom na. Unsaon man diay ni sila, ingnon nga mo-adto sila sa imperno ang magtiayon kay nag condom sila? Bisan pa Catholic, daghan di motoo sa mga pari ani, kay sobra na gyud na ka holy ang magpugong-pugong pa bisan minyo na!

  5. #455

    Default

    a staunch critic...as they have always been

  6. #456

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Raikage View Post
    There has been false propaganda regarding the benefits of the bill.

    In my opinion, we don't have a population problem, we have a discipline problem. We have to take reponsibility on our work and environment.
    I think mao na ang gamit sa bill para ma-discipline.

  7. #457

    Default

    none. a nuisance. samok2x lng.

  8. #458

    Default

    huh? buhi pa ni nga thread? ug active pa jud? kani juds manny amadong noh! hahay ba ani nya oi.

  9. #459

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by eax View Post
    I think mao na ang gamit sa bill para ma-discipline.
    Have you read the bill? , I have read it and it doesnt mention anything protecting the life inside the womb. In effect, it may legalize abortion per se and this means that babies will be pro tanto deprived of their right to live. All laws should be for the common good. And what is the common good?

    The common good is what is morally good. What is morally good? Morally good is what nourishes the spirit and the soul. It is innate and instinct in all of us.

    Abortion is not instinct!

  10. #460

    Default

    Below is one of the reasons why we need this bill. Isn't it ironic that the very people who supposedly a "human rights advocate" are actually once who violated it. So to those half-cooked advocates...SHUT THE F--- UP!

    "Official anti-condom policies

    Anti-condom ordinances
    In some cities in the Philippines, local authorities have gone as far as to prohibit the distribution of condoms in public health facilities, at times attempting to take disciplinary action against organizations that promote condoms with private funds.The example most frequently cited by service providers is ManilaCity, where Mayor Jose "Lito" Atienza has issued an executive order banning all artificial birth control, including condoms, from the city's health clinics.While Human Rights Watch did not find direct evidence of disciplinary action against service providers, many said that the ordinance was used as a basis to discipline nongovernmental organizations that promoted condoms as part of a larger family planning service.According to Dr. Jose Narciso Melchor C. Sescon, a gynecologist and director of the Remedios AIDS Foundation, Inc.:

    If at any point you advocate for family planning in Manila, the next day you will have your services shut down and padlocked.I know of two NGOs who have been shut down.In one case, the wife of the mayor performed an inspection and found contraceptive commodities on the premises.The next day, their door was padlocked.[91]

    Sescon told Human Rights Watch that in order to provide integrated HIV/AIDS and family planning services, Remedios would have to "go underground."If a client living with HIV/AIDS needed family planning services-for example, a married woman who wanted to avoid getting pregnant or infecting her husband-she would have to be referred elsewhere."If you deliver, if you even speak about family planning services, they'll have a red light on your agency," he said.

    The Women's Health Care Foundation (WHCF) is a Quezon City-based NGO that provides a range of reproductive health services and HIV prevention through a network of clinics in Metro Manila.Their clinic in ManilaCity reaches poor women living in squatter communities, some of whom survive by exchanging *** for money with boat workers in ManilaBay.Gladys Malayang, executive director of WHCF, told Human Rights Watch that WHCF volunteers who distributed condoms and pills in squatter communities feared that they would lose their land if they were caught by city authorities..."



    Source: Unprotected | Human Rights Watch

Similar Threads

 
  1. what is your stand about RH bill?
    By quantumnasher in forum Politics & Current Events
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 05-11-2011, 05:32 AM
  2. RH(Reproductive Health) Bill - Contra or Pro?
    By kenshinsasuke in forum General Discussions
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 05-11-2011, 05:31 AM
  3. Pangutana about my BDO Credit Card bills
    By lord-lord-lord in forum Business, Finance & Economics Discussions
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 11-07-2010, 05:08 AM
  4. Reproductive Health Bill yes or no?
    By drezzel86 in forum General Discussions
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 07-26-2009, 02:39 PM
  5. Reproductive Health Bill (HB 5043), Pro or Con?
    By Raikage in forum Politics & Current Events
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11-28-2008, 12:10 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
about us
We are the first Cebu Online Media.

iSTORYA.NET is Cebu's Biggest, Southern Philippines' Most Active, and the Philippines' Strongest Online Community!
follow us
#top