Hahahaha! I could have my name changed to Butt or Shit and it won't even matter. This is getting fun.

The feeling of offending someone you are
parodying without resorting to the use of
jargon and
indeterminacy is always exhilarating.
No argument there: whether its real or not doesn't matter. It might as well be false memories! The less real it becomes, the better for the contending parties who plan to utilize the memory to mold it according to their needs. This is in the context of the decades long conflict between the Maoist insurgents and the agents of the status quo, which forms the background of Palang's piteous death. Who is better adept at influencing gets his interpretation followed. The defenders of the present order have the advantage having legitimized their dominance through cultural institutions - the media included. This is pretty evident even from just skimming over the views prevalent in this forum. In the hinterlands on the other hand, where the intrusion of "civilization" is minimal, the rebels have the upperhand. Generations of rural inhabitants in the red bases will remember the heroism of Ka Hannah for years to come.
Semiotic perspective? Modern discourse? Non-sequitur? Theoretical frameworks? Obscurantist? Neofreudian? Baudillard? Mediascape? Reductionism? :o Man, have a life!
