Prayer for the Dead

[botslob]

wahahahaha patuga tuga kaman oi... ang oral tradition atong gihisgutan is ang account sa bible... abi nako nakasabot ka. ka broad anang word nga "ORAL TRADITION" pero ang atong gihisgutan diri is ang genesis biya.

PAGKA BAKAKON GYUD NIMO SPIKEY! MAMAKAK PARA MAKALUSOT hihihihi...DIA AY:

hahaayy nimo botslob... wala pa lagi oral tradition sauna kay wala pa idea ang mga tao syaro di ka kasabot ana? nya unsa may e compile nga oral tradition ni moses nga wala paman gyud oral tradition before nahisulat ang book of genesis.

Ang sinuwat ni Moses gikan lagi na ang uban sa ORAL TRADITION. PAGTOYTOY nimo oy...pangutana lagi sa imong pastor unsay oral tradition buhat buhat man kag imoha. Hihihihi

hoi dodong tanan countrys naay oral tradition kay wala pay mga books sauna. pero when it comes sa mga details sa BOOK OF GENESIS... walay labot ang oral tradition ana kay as i have said wala pay idea ang mga tao ana... like sa creation of heaven and earth and adam and eve...
pastilan jud nimo botslob oi... lusot2x sad ka da...style nimo bulok hehehe

PATAKA TO THE MAX! hihihihi...gi unsa diay pagtagna ni Moses ang Genealogy gikan ni Adam hangtod ni Joseph? HAHAHAHAH ...TIGMO? hahahaha...pangutana sa inyong pastor! Pagka wa gyud diay nimo alamag!
Ang genealogy gikan na sa oral tradition oi!!! og ubang accounts sa genesis! HAHAHAHA...HAAYY SPIKOY, PAGKA Y ALAMAG DIAY NIMO. hihihihih...

hehehe...mas bulok imoha kay y basihanan!!! HAHAHAHAH,,,NAGPAKAUWAW LANG KA. sweto ka sa bible? I dont think so! Maayo pa among silingan grade 1 kay nasayud pa! HAHAHAH!

ug sure ko nga gikutlo gyud tanan botslob... they are connected with each other...that means they are in accordance with each other... hahahaha ikaw ang ihas

oi botslob wala intawn apil ang maccabees sa hebrew canon hahahahaha ihas ka?

tan-awa ni o: gikan ni sa wikipedia nga imong idol

Biblical canon - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The book of 2 Maccabees, itself not a part of the Jewish canon, describes Nehemiah (around 400 BCE) as having "founded a library and collected books about the kings and prophets, and the writings of David, and letters of kings about votive offerings" (2:13-15). The Book of Nehemiah suggests that the priest-scribe Ezra brought the Torah back from Babylon to Jerusalem and the Second Temple (8-9) around the same time period. Both I and II Maccabees suggest that Judas Maccabeus (around 167 BCE) likewise collected sacred books (3:42-50, 2:13-15, 15:6-9), indeed some scholars argue that the Jewish canon was fixed by the Hasmonean dynasty.[7]


wahahahaha tawn sad nimo botslob oi... naunay ka sa imong kaugalingong lit-ag hahaha

HAHAHAHAHAH...WA DIAY KA KASABOT SA IMONG GIBASA. Looya nimo oy...basaha ang title spikoy akong gi repost sa ubos.... hahahaha wa kasabot!!!

SPIKEY BALIK SA OG SKWELA DONG. hihihihihi...di man diay ka kebaw mobasa! hahahahaha

[/B] Jewish canon
Main article: Development of the Jewish Bible canon

Rabbinic Judaism recognizes the twenty-four books of the Masoretic Text, commonly called the Tanakh or Hebrew Bible. Evidence suggests that the process of canonization occurred between 200 BCE and 200 CE, indeed a popular position is that the Torah was canonized circa 400 BCE, the Prophets circa 200 BCE, and the Writings circa 100 CE[5] perhaps at a hypothetical Council of Jamnia—however this position is increasingly criticised by modern scholars. The book of Deuteronomy includes a prohibition against adding or subtracting (4:2, 12:32) which might apply to the book itself (i.e. a closed book, a prohibition against future scribal editing) or to the instruction received by Moses on Mt. Sinai.[6] The book of 2 Maccabees, itself not a part of the Jewish canon, describes Nehemiah (around 400 BCE) as having "founded a library and collected books about the kings and prophets, and the writings of David, and letters of kings about votive offerings" (2:13-15). The Book of Nehemiah suggests that the priest-scribe Ezra brought the Torah back from Babylon to Jerusalem and the Second Temple (8-9) around the same time period. Both I and II Maccabees suggest that Judas Maccabeus (around 167 BCE) likewise collected sacred books (3:42-50, 2:13-15, 15:6-9), indeed some scholars argue that the Jewish canon was fixed by the Hasmonean dynasty.[7] However, these primary sources do not suggest that the canon was at that time closed; moreover, it is not clear that these sacred books were identical to those that later became part of the canon. Today, there is no scholarly consensus as to when the Jewish canon was set.[/B]

[necrotic freak]

oi necro lahi ra bitaw na sila nga sala pero wa ka kahibaw sala ra gihapon? hahaha kana diay sala sa pagpangawat ug sala kay nangabit ka parehas diay na? tawn sad nimo necro oi...

kamo raman mga baptist nag ingon nga sala na. ug dili ka maka hatag ug verse nga nag matuod nga sala na, palihug nalang kuno ug hinganlan sa mga apostles o sa mga early christian nga ni ingon nga guidili ang pag ampo sa patay. ug dili ka kahatag kami nalang mo sabot nimo spikey.. wa jud nay problema namo..

[botslob]

@SPIKOY

Dong, ayaw na intawn dungagi imong pagpaka-ulaw. You are a reflection of IGNORANCE sa inyong faith. OG disgrace sa bibliya. KA OBVIOUS OY..,PATAKA NALANG KAG IMBENTOG STORYA sa bible.

Di ba kaha spiritu sa demonyo ang nagpatigbabaw sa imong mga rason! hihihi

You're sick...seek help spikoy kay nawagtang naka sa imong pangisip hihihihi

[xiao-xiao]

It was the Catholic Church who compiled all the books to be included in the Bible yet the protestants insist that the scripture alone is the sole basis of faith.

[SPIKE_CSA]

hoy part basa balik ako post!! wala ko nag ingon bulok ka.. ang imu tubag moy bulok. .pag chur dha hah.. yaw ko labuta ana imung batasan nga ambot lang ug unsa..

asa na mana akong request oie? wala?

hehe unsa ko dj kay request man ka? hehe

by the way nag ingon diay ko nga niingon ka nga bulok ko? wala man siguro pataka ka man lng oi... ang akong giingon nga nag mention ka ug word nga "bulok" kay "bulok man kaha akong tubag" hehehe

ug tinood jud nga makasala ta ug mag ampo ta sa kalag sa usa ka tao nga mahaw-as sa purgatory. kay simple ra kaayo, kay nitoo ta ug false doctrine nga wala niya gitudlo sama anang purgatory. do you think nga ganahan ang ginoo ug false doctrine or false teachings ? hehe of course not.

[SPIKE_CSA]

@SPIKOY

Dong, ayaw na intawn dungagi imong pagpaka-ulaw. You are a reflection of IGNORANCE sa inyong faith. OG disgrace sa bibliya. KA OBVIOUS OY..,PATAKA NALANG KAG IMBENTOG STORYA sa bible.

Di ba kaha spiritu sa demonyo ang nagpatigbabaw sa imong mga rason! hihihi

You're sick...seek help spikoy kay nawagtang naka sa imong pangisip hihihihi

hahaha wala na kay lain masulti sa? and to save your face, mohimo nlng ka ug personal attack? hahaha kalooy biya nimo... ingna lng nga wala na kay lain masulti.

makita lng diri sa forum nga wa ka ka defend sa imong faith about prayer for the dead.

and again akong balikon wala pa maski isa ka tao karon sa langit and therefore wala nay gamit inyong prayer for the dead.

dili tika tubayan sa imong mga personal attack... kay di ko parehas nimo walay grado manulti...

[necrotic freak]

^^ unsa gani nang tuiga na mugna inyong true doctrine spikey?

[aztina888]

hehe unsa ko dj kay request man ka? hehe

by the way nag ingon diay ko nga niingon ka nga bulok ko? wala man siguro pataka ka man lng oi... ang akong giingon nga nag mention ka ug word nga "bulok" kay "bulok man kaha akong tubag" hehehe

ug tinood jud nga makasala ta ug mag ampo ta sa kalag sa usa ka tao nga mahaw-as sa purgatory. kay simple ra kaayo, kay nitoo ta ug false doctrine nga wala niya gitudlo sama anang purgatory. do you think nga ganahan ang ginoo ug false doctrine or false teachings ? hehe of course not.

hala oie ang verse part ang verse.. imu manang own words.. so mu tuo ko sa imu words? ahahaha mu tuo ko sa verse part so asa naman? daghan nimu pa likoy likoy oie hayz..

dli nlng na nako patulan ang imu pag deny nga ni ingon ka gi hinganlan tiga ug bulok kay ma palaw lang ka..

[baliguat]

Naa ba pud diay Padawan nga malimot sa iya Master? weeeeeee

[SPIKE_CSA]

PAGKA BAKAKON GYUD NIMO SPIKEY! MAMAKAK PARA MAKALUSOT hihihihi...DIA AY:

Ang sinuwat ni Moses gikan lagi na ang uban sa ORAL TRADITION. PAGTOYTOY nimo oy...pangutana lagi sa imong pastor unsay oral tradition buhat buhat man kag imoha. Hihihihi



PATAKA TO THE MAX! hihihihi...gi unsa diay pagtagna ni Moses ang Genealogy gikan ni Adam hangtod ni Joseph? HAHAHAHAH ...TIGMO? hahahaha...pangutana sa inyong pastor! Pagka wa gyud diay nimo alamag!
Ang genealogy gikan na sa oral tradition oi!!! og ubang accounts sa genesis! HAHAHAHA...HAAYY SPIKOY, PAGKA Y ALAMAG DIAY NIMO. hihihihih...

hehehe...mas bulok imoha kay y basihanan!!! HAHAHAHAH,,,NAGPAKAUWAW LANG KA. sweto ka sa bible? I dont think so! Maayo pa among silingan grade 1 kay nasayud pa! HAHAHAH!



HAHAHAHAHAH...WA DIAY KA KASABOT SA IMONG GIBASA. Looya nimo oy...basaha ang title spikoy akong gi repost sa ubos.... hahahaha wa kasabot!!!

SPIKEY BALIK SA OG SKWELA DONG. hihihihihi...di man diay ka kebaw mobasa! hahahahaha

[/B] Jewish canon
Main article: Development of the Jewish Bible canon

Rabbinic Judaism recognizes the twenty-four books of the Masoretic Text, commonly called the Tanakh or Hebrew Bible. Evidence suggests that the process of canonization occurred between 200 BCE and 200 CE, indeed a popular position is that the Torah was canonized circa 400 BCE, the Prophets circa 200 BCE, and the Writings circa 100 CE[5] perhaps at a hypothetical Council of Jamnia—however this position is increasingly criticised by modern scholars. The book of Deuteronomy includes a prohibition against adding or subtracting (4:2, 12:32) which might apply to the book itself (i.e. a closed book, a prohibition against future scribal editing) or to the instruction received by Moses on Mt. Sinai.[6] The book of 2 Maccabees, itself not a part of the Jewish canon, describes Nehemiah (around 400 BCE) as having "founded a library and collected books about the kings and prophets, and the writings of David, and letters of kings about votive offerings" (2:13-15). The Book of Nehemiah suggests that the priest-scribe Ezra brought the Torah back from Babylon to Jerusalem and the Second Temple (8-9) around the same time period. Both I and II Maccabees suggest that Judas Maccabeus (around 167 BCE) likewise collected sacred books (3:42-50, 2:13-15, 15:6-9), indeed some scholars argue that the Jewish canon was fixed by the Hasmonean dynasty.[7] However, these primary sources do not suggest that the canon was at that time closed; moreover, it is not clear that these sacred books were identical to those that later became part of the canon. Today, there is no scholarly consensus as to when the Jewish canon was set.[/B]

wahahahaa genealogy ni adam hangtod ni Joseph? of course ang ginoo nag ingon ni moses ana oi... kinsa man diay? ang oral tradition? hahahaha gi unsa gud pagkahibaw sa mga tao ana nga ka taas anang panahona? pag chur dira oi ikaw raman siguro ang masakiton hahahaha pa admit sa didto sa CCMC oi hehehe basin maulian paka didto hehehehe

hahayy nimo botslob... maski unsaon ug basa ang wikipedia source nimo klaro kaayo ang

"The book of 2 Maccabees, itself not a part of the Jewish canon,"

ambot nlng nimo... masakiton na gyud siguro ka kay wa ka kabantay hehehe