he was kidnapped..
katong security cam sa NAIA pag abot ni Lozada from HK, murag di man jud intawn to kidnap oi bisan unsaon nakog tan-aw..
dili jud mahimo iyang hilak2x dwe cebu... kay dili man mga bogo...
It seems Lozada will have to whine some more, not only because he has lost his fame, but also because he lost in his petition. All his lies are proven in in light of the recent decision. Besides, the footages will tell us he was not really kidnapped.
It was just him and his family who keeps on saying he was kidnapped. Lacson might have used him well for propaganda purposes.
Does kidnapping really requires struggle to prove that it really happen?What if kung pag abot pa lang niya sa airport gi tagbo na siya ug giingnan nga sunod lang diri aron wlay gubot.Presence of intimidation may contribute also to kidnapping.Pero wla ta mahimo ang judges mo base lang man na sa kabug-at sa gi presentar nga mga ebidensya.Dili tungod sa ilang konsensya.
Yeah, according to his imaginations and the constant propagation of all these lies to the public by our messenger of truth, kuno -the media.
As the saying goes, when lies are always hammered to the public as true, it becomes true. So the question now is how shall truth will make us free when truth has been suppresed by the media so they can just sell?
Your comments are bordering on innuendos or heresies. Read the decision. Parts of it were already quoted by the media. Example: How could he claim he was kidnapped when the fact says he was the one requesting for security because initially he still does not want to testify in the senata. And here is the kicker... He changed his decision, only after he spoke to an auxiliary bishop of Manila and hence twisting the story.
Bai basaha una ang decision kay lisud ning pataka lang ta dire ug yawit.
.. guys, relax.. no need to further discuss this issue, even the justices are confused themselves.
Similar Threads |
|