On Executive Order 464~

[tolstoi]

IT WAS NOT ILLEGAL DURING CORY'S TIME..WHY WOULD THEY MAKE IT ILLEGAL NOW??

[Moshi Moshi]

IT WAS NOT ILLEGAL DURING CORY'S TIME..WHY WOULD THEY MAKE IT ILLEGAL NOW??

There's nothing Illegal. Everything is Legal as long as you have a great margin of supporters.

[Moshi Moshi]

GMA should have written a MeMo. Executive orders affects all.

tolstoi says:
as i said the scope of the executive order is only bounded to GMA's cabinet, the PUBLIC is not in any way affected by it...noRika says:
EO 464...... ummmmm.... it is a battle in the higher officials...but as an individual citizen, let's ask/evaluate ourselves on what should we can offer/contribute/do to make our country better than today...

Who is covered by EO 464? Following the Chain of command; All Government employee. Your Public has no power over any public official. Their power was sold long time ago (last election).

Does the public has power over the public official? Nope. Sorry. As loud as they shout, they will not be heard. they may end up in jail and lots of bruise ego.

What is the Job Description of the Philippine President? Approves bill from Senate/Congress and Photo ops.

Shorcut for Execution Order 464 is like this:

I moshi moshi declare moshi order 666 to gag anyone who does not agree with me. What I say shall be the only truth and must be followed in any way or form. Whoever disagree with me will be fired, be arrested and jailed till I say otherwise.

Davide says: I'm resigning by December.

People of the Philippines VS GMA

For issuing EO 464 which corruptly hampers, or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication influences, obstructs,? impedes or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede?the due and proper exercise of the power of inquiry under which any inquiry or investigation is being had by either House, or any committee of either House or any joint committee of the Congress and Senate.

EO 464 is a clear interference to a Corruption Probe, Investigation, Justice and Truth.

The three branches the legislative, executive, and judicial may use its powers to check the powers of the other two in order to maintain a balance of power among the three branches of government.

[Freeza]

http://news.inq7.net/breaking/index....story_id=73155

http://www.abs-cbnnews.com/storypage.aspx?StoryID=36164


beleaguered senate after taking all out offensive of the of the mighty executive still manage to hang on and some how survive althought a little bit more time cha-cha will make them history....now EO 464 is struck down mmm it would be interesting to see if the senate hasÂ* political punching power left ....its seems theyÂ* after taking blow by blow of the political battle are finish... but anyway they seems to survive... will they rise upagain and hit up with full of energy one sign ,they seems to unite now after threat of extinction thru chacha although they still quarrel like punks enrile and madrigal..etc

mm mm i think There's going to be renew political battle looming in the coming weeksÂ* the legislative particulary the upper house is going to press for their most potent weapon their so calledÂ* legislative investigation now they are free to call anyone


but they forgot one thing GMA had just use 10%Â* of her power ...mohahahaha

[mosimos]

Waaaaa. Freeza is sourgraping.

It was a crushing defeat for Arroyo . The Senate gave Arroyo a knockout punch. Arroyo is down on the canvass; seeing stars on her head. One. . .Two. . .Three. . .Four. . .Five. . .Six. . .seven. . .eight. . . Wow! a mandatory eight count and Arroyo barely made it.

What 10 % of her power? You are hallucinating. You are maybe fond of watching superhero movies. This aint super hero stuff boy. Next stop Cha cha initiative. Arroyo will again have another crushing defeat.

These proves is the Senate is on the right track as far as upholding the rule of law is concerned.

find the meaning of the word 'respect'

thank you.

[Freeza]

although im supporting the sitting president of the republic...... i was looking at the current events at a professional perspective and was expecting intelligent discussion even from a dic@head like you obviously i was wrong.

sougraping?? senate gave arroyo a knockout punch?? jesus ........................HAVE you read about the Executive order 464 .....

GROW UP!!!!! mosimos

and by the way MOSIMOS are you full of *********?

that goes to you too.

you can blurt as many expletives as you want. just do not use your fingers when u do so.

[potterboy]

grow up guys. mura naman mo ug bata oi.

[wak_wak]

For me comment ni mossimo is ok, he has his Freedom of Speech :mrgreen:

================================================== =======

MAYRA NI ARROYO!

Atleast karun mura kibaw na sya na di tanan iya ganahan masunod

[mosimos]

although im supporting the sitting president of the republic...... i was looking at the current events at a professional perspective and was expecting intelligent discussion even from a dic@head like you obviously i was wrong.

sougraping?? senate gave arroyo a knockout punch??Â* jesus ........................HAVEÂ* you read about the Executive order 464 .....

GROW UP!!!!! mosimos

and by the wayÂ* MOSIMOS are you full of sssssssshit

You should be the one to grow up. After all, you set the tone of the discussion by using the term "puching power" and " Using 10% of her power." Discuss with me the merits of the law and I will discuss it with you.

[grabehbebe]

Take it easy on EO 464, Miriam tells colleagues

SENATOR Miriam Defensor Santiago yesterday cautioned her colleagues not to hit back by using the power of contempt against Cabinet and military officials who earlier stayed away from congressional hearings because of Executive Order 464.

Senator Rodolfo Biazon, meanwhile, suggested that Palace officials and senators meet to establish common ground with respect to their interpretation of the Supreme Court ruling on EO 464 to prevent a full-blown confrontation.

Last week, the Supreme Court declared as unconstitutional a provision in EO 464 that required executive department officials to obtain presidential consent before testifying in Congress.

Senators had challenged EO 464 before the tribunal, arguing that it impinged on their power to write laws.

“Congress should avoid impulsive retaliatory measures, such as citing for contempt absent Cabinet members, or abolishing budgetary appropriations of their departments. It is best to be patient because haste makes bad law,� Santiago said
.
Santiago said, however, that threats from several senators to aggressively use their power of contempt was to be expected because they viewed EO 464 as provocative.
“The EO angered and offended them,� she said.

Santiago, an expert in constitutional law, said the recent Supreme Court ruling on EO 464 represents a continuation of legal tradition concerning the legislative power to investigate and the President’s power to invoke executive privilege.

“The Supreme Court tried to avoid a head-on collision by suggesting a compromise, meaning a narrow construction. It steered both political branches of government toward an acceptable accommodation,� she said.

Biazon, for his part, stressed that both the Senate and the Palace should maintain “a certain amount of civility.�

“If we want to make institutions and institutional processes work, there must be a common ground and this common ground should include interpretation of different national policies,� Biazon said.

He noted that the Palace and several members of Congress have different interpretations of the Supreme Court decision, so the parties should try to come up with a common understanding.

Biazon said his committee would resume hearings on the alleged poll fraud and wiretapping on May 17, shortly after the Senate resumes its session. With Joyce Pangco Pañares and Macon Ramos Araneta




--By Roy Pelovello
http://www.manilastandardtoday.com/?...5_april25_2006