Page 7 of 32 FirstFirst ... 4567891017 ... LastLast
Results 61 to 70 of 315
  1. #61

    Quote Originally Posted by cebu-future View Post
    Overview of Leviticus 18:22

    "Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination." 8
    This is a passage from the Mosaic Code that is often used to condemn homosexual behavior in general. In transliterated Hebrew, the verse is written: "V’et zachar lo tishkav mishk’vey eeshah toeyvah hee."
    The first part of this verse is literally translated as "And with a male you shall not lay lyings of a woman" Many, probably most, theologians, Bible translations and biblical commentators agree that the verse is directed at men who engage in at least some form of anal *** with other men. But they do not agree on the full scope of the forbidden activities. For example: The Living Bible greatly widens the scope of the original Hebrew to include all homosexual acts by both men and women. They confuse the matter further by not differentiating between homosexual orientation and homosexual behavior. They render the first part of this verse as: "Homosexuality is absolutely forbidden." On the other hand, many religious liberals have interpreted the beginning of this verse as referring only to sexual activities between two males during a Pagan temple ritual. If there were a liberal translation of the Bible, it might say "Ritual anal *** between two men in a Pagan temple is forbidden." The second part of this verse explains what type of sin this transgression falls under. There are two types of sin in the Mosaic Code:
    1. Moral sin is produced by rebellion against God. This seems to be the interpretation of most biblical translations imply when they translate the Hebrew "toeyvah" into English words such as "abomination," "enormous sin," or "detestable."
    2. Ceremonial uncleanliness is caused by contact with a forbidden object or by engaging in a behavior which might be quite acceptable to non-Hebrews, but which was forbidden to the Children of Israel. Eating birds of prey, eating shellfish, cross breeding livestock, picking up sticks on a Saturday, planting a mixture of seeds in a field, and wearing clothing that is a blend of two textiles are examples of acts of ritual impurity which made a Child of Isreal unclean. These were not necessarily minor sins; some called for the death penalty.

    The verse is, unfortunately, incomplete. Its precise meaning is unclear. The phrase "lay lyings" has no obvious interpretation. Attempts have been made to make sense out of the original Hebrew by inserting a short phrase into the verse. For example:

    1. The Net Bible® translation 1 inserts two words to produce "And with a male you shall not lay [as the] lyings of a woman." A man must not have sexual intercourse with another man as he would normally have with a woman. i.e. anal intercourse between two men is not permitted. From this literal, word for word translation, they produce a smoother English version: "You must not have sexual intercourse with a male as one has sexual intercourse with a woman."
    2. An alternative translation would insert a different pair of words to produce: "And with a male you shall not lay [in the] lyings of a woman." That is, two men must not engage in sexual behavior on a woman's bed. Presumably, they must go elsewhere to have ***; a woman's bed was sacred and was to be reserved for heterosexual ***.

    Which is the correct translation?

    Obviously, it is important for a student of the Bible to resolve exactly what behavior is forbidden: is it:
    All homosexual behavior, by either men or women, or All sexual behavior between two men, or Only anal *** between two men, or Only anal *** in a Pagan temple ritual, or Sexual activity between two men in a woman's bed? Unfortunately, there is no consensus on the meaning of this verse. Many people tend to select that interpretation that most closely reinforces their initial beliefs about the Bible and homosexual behavior.
    English translations of this verse:

    These are not a great deal of help. Bible publishers are under strong economic pressures to turn a profit. If a translation of Leviticus 18:22 were included that did not generally condemn at least male homosexual behavior, their sales would drop precipitously. They are unlikely to deviate from traditional interpretations, unless they were preparing a translation specifically for Christian and Jewish liberals.
    Some translations are:
    ESV: (English Standard Version): "You shall not lie with a man as with a woman; it is abomination." KJV: (King James Version): "Thou shalt not lie with mankind as with womankind: it is abomination". LB: (Living Bible): "Homosexuality is absolutely forbidden, for it is an enormous sin" Net Bible: "You must not have sexual intercourse with a male as one has sexual intercourse with a woman; it is a detestable act." 1 NIV: (New International Version) "Do not lie with a man as one lies with a woman; that is detestable." NLT: (New Living Translation): "Do not practice homosexuality; it is a detestable sin. RSV: (Revised Standard Version): "You shall not lie with a male as with a woman; it is an abomination . The LB and NLT translations use the term "homosexuality" That is unusually deceptive for three reasons:
    The passage in the ancient Hebrew is clearly talking about male-male *** acts. By using the word "homosexuality," the English translation appears to condemn lesbian activity as well. The latter behavior is definitely not mentioned in the original Hebrew text of this passage. In fact, lesbian behavior is not mentioned anywhere in the Hebrew Scriptures. The term "homosexuality" has two distinct meanings in English. Sometimes it refers to sexual behavior (what some people do). Sometimes it relates to sexual orientation (what some people are). One reader might conclude from an English translation that homosexual orientation is criticized in the Bible; others might assume that homosexual behavior is criticized. The word "homosexual" was first used in the very late in 19th century CE. There was no Hebrew word that meant "homosexual." Thus, whenever the word is seen in an English translation of the Bible, one should be wary that the translators might be inserting their own prejudices into the text.
    Leviticus 18:22 and homosexuality; all views

    -----------I hope that helps you better understand the lines.

    I Corinthians 6:9 (new testament)


    "Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor homosexual, nor sodomites, Nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners, shall inherit the kingdom of God."
    Yes that's what I've understood way before you mentioned those things. Pero wala lang siguro nako giklaro ug state sa akong previous post. But anyway thanks.

  2. #62

    Default To jollibee

    What gave you the right to say that the catholics can't opposed to same *** marraige. First of all the Philippines is a free country. Secondly YOU should give them respect since they do have reason to oppose. Everyone has the right to disagree or agree but no one should silence to the people they opposed. UKINANA DAGITI BAYOT

  3. #63
    err... you guys don't get it do you? even if this thread will reach to 100th page, this debate will go on for ages. mangabit nalng inyong mga anak sa inyong anak or mka panganak nalng ug bayot inyong mga apo sa inyong mga apo, mag debate japon ang mga taw ani.

  4. #64
    oh pleez gay lovers !!
    marriage is for a man and a woman thats how it is and has always been !
    just because time has change and technology ever growing so will we condone to gay marriages?
    maybe 30 years from now people will be marrying dogs and cats ? bestiality way of life next?? homosexuality is a mental illness !!
    na unsa naman mo oi!!!!
    ayaw mo pa parang ingnon nga liberated or open minded kay ma morag kolokoy na hinuon ang inyong argument !

    homosexuals be contentd and be discreet pls .

  5. #65
    It's Adam & Eve --- not Adam & StEve...

  6. #66
    dili ingon gay or lesbian mo, di na mo pinangga sa ginoo or respetaran sa inyong isig ka tawo, ayaw lang mo pag kalat.

    pero kung inyo pa ng ipugos ang pag minyo sa inyong isig ka-gender mura'g di na sad na maayo. there are lot of moral reason and purpose for marriage and some of them are pro-creation and rearing christian off springs. how can a gay couple do so?

  7. #67
    hahayz... ambot ani nga debate. hehehe.. honestly, i find this debate boring.

    Marriage = Sacred to Catholics

    I'm a Roman Catholic but i haven't read the bible (yet or prolly never will. LOL) so i may be naive. but let me say this.... Marriage is no joke.

    In weddings, priest always tell the couples to say their vows and tell them to be together for richer or poorer, in sickness and in health til death do us part and etc... so it means that annulments/divorce is not an option here.

    so tell me, how many divorces/annulments will happen in Philippines if they will legalize the same *** marriage? even some parents with their own biological child/children leave their husband/wife, how much more to same *** couples where they can't even produce a child on their own? remember, divorce is forbidden in Roman Catholic faith and our country adapt this law. if only people respects this law, then why debate?

    like everyone said, this is a free country but there are rules/laws to be followed. some people are taking the word "free country" literally.
    Last edited by Gray_Fox; 08-04-2008 at 02:53 AM.

  8. #68
    I don't see a very good point of same *** marriages. Most of these people act because of what they feel and not because of what they think. We all have morals and norms to supposedly follow and we all have to live with it, not bend it in favor of the minority. Homos have fought for their rights but going as far as marrying each other is a little bit too much. What's the point of marrying somebody of the same ***? Love, I don't think so, it's more of lust. Now if this pushes through, what's next? Homo *** in public? Homo polygamy? I guess it's clear, God created Adam and Eve, not Adam and Steve. Homos are homos and it's that kind of sacrifice that they've got to live with.

  9. #69
    if this push through what next? hint: zoophilia/bestiality

    and they say the pope is a homophobe. so, no way they could win this over catholic ground.

  10. #70
    Even gay people in our office are AGAINST same-*** marriage. According to them, "These faggots are taking it too far. Anong akala nila sa kasal? Live-in2x lang, tapos divorce pag sawa na? This law should have not been approved in California the first place."

    This statement was made by a 60 year old Gay Filipino living with a 50 year old white American for almost 15 years among other long term inter-racial relationships prior to his current. He added, "Hindi pala matigas ang paninindigan at buo ang luob ni Kuya Arnie "The Terminator" Kinaya lang siya ng mga bading at T-bo sa Cali. HAHAHA!!!"

  11.    Advertisement

Page 7 of 32 FirstFirst ... 4567891017 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

 
  1. Iowa State Legalizes Gay Marriage. Uyon ba mo sa Gay Marriage?
    By james_chaw in forum General Discussions
    Replies: 60
    Last Post: 03-22-2011, 12:41 AM
  2. Support Gay Marriage!
    By SQUiDnine in forum Humor
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 07-13-2009, 02:25 PM
  3. Vote against gay marriage in CNN poll ! May 2, 2009 only
    By leoricknight in forum Politics & Current Events
    Replies: 42
    Last Post: 05-05-2009, 11:05 AM
  4. MERGED: Protest against Desperate Housewives
    By kamikaze426 in forum Politics & Current Events
    Replies: 198
    Last Post: 11-20-2007, 10:56 AM
  5. Albinos Protest against "Da Vinci Code"
    By Carlo Borromeo in forum Politics & Current Events
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 05-30-2006, 08:42 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
about us
We are the first Cebu Online Media.

iSTORYA.NET is Cebu's Biggest, Southern Philippines' Most Active, and the Philippines' Strongest Online Community!
follow us
#top