i read an article in yahoo. marriages after live-in have a higher percentage of divorce than those who gets married and have never lived together before.
so i guess my answer is a no on this one.
for me it's better nga "NO"...
however, i've tried doing this before marriage... he he...
but then again, it's the two of you who is going to decide...
siguro when it comes to security with regards to anything (legal, emotional, financial, etc. etc nga cial) mas maayo jud ang dili live in...
yup ok ra live in before marriage, pra mas makaila pa judka sa imu partner. see how things go when you're together. mulutaw man jud nang tinuod batasan.. its a good way of knowing each other a lot better.
and for my idea about the quote above, impossible ang live in without ***. mahitabo jud na xa..*** is another factor in a relationship u know....its not really that important but it happens...
ok ramn sad nga marriage jud first. mas moral jud na nga way...that is kung kaila najud ka totally sa imu partner..bati jud nang pakasal dayun unya la pa kaau kaila sa imu partner..basin muend up ra ang tanan sa bad marriage.
well, i'm no to this..bahala nalang ma.single parent ko kaysa mag.live in2..saon
For me NO, because knowing the person more doesnt mean you really have to live with him/her. there are other ways for people to know each other. If they will live together first without marriage, tendencies are they will get bored sooner that will lead to break up and "maybe" the passion or the thrilling isnt there when they get married after living together.
I havent tried both - live in and marriage, so this is just my opinion.
Similar Threads |
|