Parliamentary Form of Government

[trickyboy]

---

Kung ing-ana ang case, the situation would arise that taxes will be doubled. Take for instant the US .... they are having so much tax ... it soars really really high.

As for the case that "we can help other small state" it isn't applicable to federal countries. It's still the "Entire" populace who would decide that ... tell it "ala-democracy".

[arnoldsa]

kung moingon sad mog federal government, maluoy tas mga province nga dili makahimo nga makaindependent cla......naa man guy mga province diwe.....nga nagsalig sa gobyerno....peace.

True especially the poorer provinces whose economy relies only on farming.... However there is a solution to that because in a federal system, not all provinces will become individual states... There will actually be some sort of a rearrangement.... For example the whole of Central Visayas perhaps can become a single state...

[Wind Shear]

Read this post: http://forums.istorya.net/index.php?...045#msg1035045

[SkylineScroller]

if u dont know this form of government, better not answer...

Approved : 1
Disapproved: 0

... nindot dyud ang parliamentary coz with this form, kay ma minimize ang corruption. THEn, mas dako ang makuha nato nga porsyento sa gross income sa cebu. hayahay kaayo ta... ma decentralize na ang government...

[tolstoi]

what i know is..the countries that are currently adopting this form of government are really progressive like Japan, Singapore and some European countries..etc...so why not give it a try

[Wind Shear]

Parliamentary is just a legislature. I suggest we have so called the unicameral type of parliamentary legislature to speed up on the creation of law.

The parliamentary doesn't mean that it will minimize the corruuption since it is just a kind of legislature. Kung ingon nato what-you-sow-is-what-you-reap, you are referring to federal form of government.

And yeah, mawala ang powers sa president, pangceremonial na lang ang presidente (igo na lang mopirma sa bala-od). Ang mo goverrn na sa nasod is ang prime minister, elected by the members of the parliament.

[Empress_Of_Drac]

if u dont know this form of government, better not answer...

Approved : 1
Disapproved: 0

... nindot dyud ang parliamentary coz with this form, kay ma minimize ang corruption. THEn, mas dako ang makuha nato nga porsyento sa gross income sa cebu. hayahay kaayo ta... ma decentralize na ang government...

yap pabor...like the british government....mas maau ni kay dili kaayo centralized ang pamalakad sa govierno....pabor ko ani..yooh

[trickyboy]

Unsay Walay Corruption Ditto to Wind Shear's statement, it's just legislature ... and still there is burucracy that will going to happen. Kung ing-ani lang gihapon ang legislature even if there's some sort of "system change" dili gihapon na maka-solve sa problema sa nasod!

[Moshi Moshi]

Drilon explained that proponents of Cha-Cha (Charter Change) through a constituent assembly will be blocked by senators because they do not believe it will resolve the current political crisis.

Other senators, notably Senators Serge Osmeña and Jamby Madrigal share the same sentiment.

Osmeña said Constitutional amendments at this time merely divert attention from the real problem which is corruption in all branches of government.

"With the same persons in government, we would merely have federal crooks instead of republican crooks. Same crocodiles, different names," he said.

Furthermore, he pointed out that a parliament cannot legislate morality, it merely regulates behavior.

"All our laws against graft, murder, jueteng, smuggling, illegal drugs, estafa are selectively enforced. This anomaly will persist even with a switch in systems," he argued.

Madrigal added that these issues are not relevant to resolving the current national crisis of governance.

"To change the form of government is no guarantee to ending corruption. The issue of corruption in all levels of government should be given priority. Otherwise, it would be like giving a cancer patient a band aid to cure himself," she said.

http://www.mb.com.ph/MAIN2005071939755.html

[JoRed]

The Philippines have been thru this. Like Marcos before her, Gloria is taking the diversionary path. Gloria is just refining Macoy's methods. She picks it up where Marcos left off.Here's the CPP's press release.

PRESS RELEASE
Information Bureau
Communist Party of the Philippines

Chacha, a futile diversionary tactic--CPP
July 13, 2005



The Communist Party of the Philippines (CPP) today charged that the regime’s renewed effort to promote charter changes (chacha) is an “obvious ruse” that is bound to fail in diverting the people’s attention and derailing the escalating mass protest movement to oust Gloria Arroyo from Malacañang.


CPP spokesperson Gregorio “Ka Roger” Rosal said the Arroyo regime’s chacha gambit will fail to mitigate the intensifying antagonism between the increasingly isolated Arroyo clique and the growing numbers of people opposed to its rule. “It cannot stop the accelerating pace leading to the regime’s downfall,” he said.


Rosal cited widespread public skepticism about chacha. “They perceive it as a desperate ploy to save the detested Arroyo presidency and advance the imperialist and fascist agenda of gratifying the US and the fascists by injecting more anti-national and anti-democratic provisions,” he said.


“The longer Gloria Arroyo survives her regime’s paroxysms and defer its inevitable demise with such desperate schemes, the more the entire system degenerates, and the more the people’s anger intensifies,” said Rosal. “The Arroyo Resign movement is bound to further swell into a nationwide protest movement.”


“Ultimately, this provides the revolutionary movement manifold opportunities to move forward more vigorously,” Rosal said. He noted that “the revolutionary forces are advancing on all fronts, taking stock of the unfolding situation and seizing all opportunities to advance the people’s movement and revolutionary war and bringing them closer to victory.”

Reference:
Anne Buenaventura
Media Officer
Cellphone Number: +63910-240-3553