Prof. Jose Maria Sison's analysis...Interesting read!

[agoroy]

bai agoroy,

dont drag the topic palayo. just do an argument regarding on what you are believing in.

I doubt that you have a full grasp of Communism as what antoy hilom has.
Though you think so brightly but it seemed that it is too far to pick an argument.

Commies leaders are plagued with corruption? How could it be? but it was not quite worth of answering, just stay on topic about why Communism Failed...kay para nako, Communism hasn't tried. Mao na interesting sa uban nga perspective kay na failure na, samtang wala pa gani nasulayi. Mura diay og whistle bomb, nga nibuto una, usa ming whistle ba.

And cerebus, mind your own business, if your business is minding somebody's business, then good luck.
[/list]

i've read so much about it that i can say that i wasted my time reading an utopian idea.

"Communism hasn't tried"

what's with the u.s.s.r then? is "Soviet Socialist" in ussr is not what you mean?

how about china? how about cuba?

you don't have to read all those written by marx, lenin, trotsky etc.... just to have grasp of communisms.

do you really have to try the theory before you will consider it as a failure? even if it's clear. is "EQUALITY" unclear?

mora ug kape sagolan gatas .. bisan unsaon nato pagbali bali.. 1 equal part of milk and 1 equal part of coffee will end up coffee with milk .. di na pwede mahimong pure coffee or pure cows milk.


for the meantime di na lang sa ko motubag ani kay mora ug walay padulngan. .. i'll create new ones about this kung di ko bz.

[HoundedbyHeaven]

kay para nako, Communism hasn't tried. Mao na interesting sa uban nga perspective kay na failure na, samtang wala pa gani nasulayi. Mura diay og whistle bomb, nga nibuto una, usa ming whistle ba. And cerebus, mind your own business, if your business is minding somebody's business, then good luck.

Curious. May I ask, are you of the position that Communism, as described by Marxism-Leninism-Maoism, has not emerged in history because the entire world (or at least the majority of the world's countries) have not become socialist countries? As a related question, are you of the position that neither the former USSR or China has grown past socialism?

[cerebus]

bai agoroy,
And cerebus, mind your own business, if your business is minding somebody's business, then good luck.

and what button did i press this time that makes you pikon 'again'? grud, man. i'm just curious. just asking. which of my question 'hurts' you? i just want to draw a line.

oh, by the way, did you remember that i got some simple question for you from your previous post that you could answer? i'll be honored if you could answer those.

[JoRed]

IT IS IMMORAL FOR AQUINO AND OTHERS
TO CONDONE THE CRIMES OF ARROYO



By Prof. JOSE MARIA SISON
Chief Political Consultant
NDFP Negotiating Panel

1 July 2005



It is immoral for Corazon Aquino and others to condone the crimes of Gloria M. Arroyo and help to keep her in power. Aquino is the least qualified to advice Susan Roces on the rule of law. She never filed an electoral protest to prove legally that she had been cheated by Marcos. Neither did she undertake impeachment proceedings against him. She became president in 1986 through the successful democratic mass actions of the sovereign Filipino people who ousted Marcos from power.

Right now, Susan Roces who is the widow of the main victim of massive electoral fraud in 2004 has the moral ascendancy over the usurper of office Arroyo and likewise over Aquino. She has all the right to participate in the broad united front and mass movement for the ouster of the immoral and illegitimate Arroyo regime. Moreover, unlike Aquino in 1986, she has no immediate personal interest in becoming president. Her current main interest is in fighting for truth and justice and demanding that the wrongdoer Arroyo give up the presidency that she has stolen.

The Arroyo regime and its closest loyalists spread certain fears that are calculated to discourage the people from mobilizing against them. They claim that the ouster of Arroyo by the people’s direct democratic actions would undermine and destabilize the entire ruling system and merely open the door to a coup d’etat by the military.

They say that the people must simply condone the high crimes of Arroyo because impeachment proceedings cannot succeed against her and because anyway her constitutional successor is a corrupt nincompoop. They boast that the people have no choice but to tolerate Arroyo and her cohorts despite their grave crimes, including treason, corruption and gross violations of human rights, because supposedly no individual or set of individuals from among 84 million Filipinos can replace her.

But the longer the Arroyo regime remains in power, the more rotten and more unstable the entire ruling system of big compradors and landlords would become. The failure of the legal democratic mass movement to oust the Arroyo regime would further polarize the reactionary political and military factions of the ruling system and would fuel the flames of the people’s democratic armed revolution.

At the moment, there are at least four major groups of military and police officers working for the withdrawal of military and police support from the Arroyo regime. They wish to shift their support to a new civilian government. They express allegiance to the principle of civilian supremacy, respect democratic rights and disdain military rule. At any rate, not one of such groups is ready to take power for itself and offend the other groups and the broad masses of the people.

The Communist Party of the Philippines (CPP) has already announced through its official publication that the New People’s Army is intensifying its armed tactical offensives in the countryside but is encouraging the broad united front of legal opposition parties and mass organizations to mobilize the people for legal mass actions in urban population centers. The current core of such legal forces has the high potential of becoming the gigantic force for ousting the Arroyo regime.

To break the grip of the Arroyo regime on all the branches of the reactionary government and to oust this regime completely from power, it is necessary to mobilize the people in the millions. Thus, the opposition parties and the patriotic and progressive mass organizations are now rapidly raising the level of their common understanding, cooperation and coordination in a broad united front. On the basis of the rapidly growing mass movement, they can in due course hold a people’s consultative assembly to elect a council of leaders and ratify a program of government. ###

[marquee]

hoi JoMa uli dri. maayo lang ka sa istorya wa sa buhat...

[whiteoleander]

OT:

hoi JoMa uli dri. maayo lang ka sa istorya wa sa buhat...

Â* kusga gamay ang tingog...layo layo 'ra ba ang Holland. ..lolz!

mao jud , ana man jud nang talawan , magpalayo ug magpabungolbungol. ug worst , ma-maon, gipaon ra mo ana bai ...

[JoRed]

ARROYO REGIME MUST COME TO AN END
FOR ITS GRAVE CRIMES AGAINST THE PEOPLE



By Prof. JOSE MARIA SISON
Chief Political Consultant
NDFP Negotiating Panel

28 June 2005



The belated confession of Gloria M. Arroyo that hers is the voice on the tapes, telling a commissioner on elections to deliver the vote margin that she wanted, cannot exculpate her from the grave crime of massive electoral fraud. This is not a minor lapse in judgment but a serious crime that must be thoroughly investigated and tried.

Arroyo has made her confession because of the mounting popular demand for her to break her silence and the failure of her armed agents to locate the original tapes in order to destroy them.

The confession is done in bad faith. The apology is insincere and worthless because it is not accompanied by her resignation. It is intended to let the electoral cheat and her cohorts keep their ill-gotten power and all the opportunities for further bureaucratic corruption at the expense of the Filipino people.

After the confession of Gloria M. Arroyo, in the face of the undeniable truth and under the pressure of public opinion and mass unrest, there is greater and more compelling reason for the Filipino people to exercise their sovereign power to oust her and her cohorts from power or compel them to resign through the mass movement.

The House of Representatives is dominated by Arroyo loyalists headed by Speaker Jose de Venecia. It is therefore futile to undertake impeachment proceedings against her. The only way to remove her from power and make her answerable for her crimes is to undertake a mass movement with cumulative strength, scope and intensity.

Arroyo has committed too many grave crimes aside from massive electoral fraud. Following the orders of the US as her imperialist master, she has intensified the exploitation and oppression of the Filipino people. The broad masses of the people are revolted by their economic suffering and the cruelty of state terrorism under the Arroyo regime.

It is fine if the broad united front and the broad mass movement can remove the Arroyo ruling clique from power. They have a good chance of ousting the ruling clique within the second half of this year, if certain groups and movements of military and police forces keep their word to uphold civilian supremacy, respect the people’s rights and withdraw support from the hated regime.

After the resignation or ouster of the Arroyo-de Castro tandem, a people’s democratic council can act as a transition government to conduct snap elections of executive officials as well as delegates to a constitutional convention that is not in the clutches of Arroyo and Speaker De Venecia.

But some powerful forces wish to condone all the accumulated and continuing crimes of the Arroyo ruling clique because of the irrational fear that the entire ruling system might be undermined by the mass movement if once more this succeeds in removing a ruling clique from power before the next presidential elections.

For any length of time that it can prolong its rule, the rotten Arroyo reactionary clique can only deepen and aggravate the rottenness of the entire ruling system of big compradors and landlords servile to US imperialism. It can only drive the people to overthrow not only itself but the entire ruling system.

If the regime is able to stay in power through the use of brute force and because certain forces condone and support it, the Filipino people are more than ever justified in waging the armed revolution for national liberation and democracy against US imperialism and the local exploiting classes. ###

[marquee]

now the coward is saying! wahahahaha tara na mga kafatid!

[JoRed]

NDFP ANSWERS FALSE CLAIMS
AGAINST THE REVOLUTIONARY MOVEMENT

RUTH DE LEON
Executive Director
NDFP International Information Office


Introduction

In the course of its thirty-six years of struggle for national and social liberation, the Philippine revolutionary movement has fought for the fundamental national and democratic rights and interests of the Filipino people. Thus its programs for land reform, health, education, and culture are meant to respond to the demands and aspirations of the peasants, workers and other sections of the people.

We are convinced that the unjust social order, the corrupt and rotten semicolonial and semifeudal ruling system, inflicts the most intolerable exploitation and oppression on the people. Furthermore, US imperialism and the local exploiting classes of big compradors and landlords subject the people to the daily violence of exploitation and the use of its military, police and paramilitary forces to violently suppress the people’s just struggle against this unjust social order. Therefore, the revolutionary movement fights to overthrow this unjust social order and to achieve genuine independence, social justice, democracy and peace.

In carrying out its legitimate struggle, the revolutionary movement relies on the support of the people. Because its programs respond to the people’s deepest aspirations for national liberation, land reform, national industrialization, and for social justice, democracy and peace, it has been able to grow strong and develop mass organizations, organs of political power and units of the people’s army in more than 800 municipalities and almost 70 provinces throughout the country.

The revolutionary movement has taken pains to observe the highest standards of human rights and international humanitarian law in carrying out its struggle as a national liberation movement. It has laid down the fundamental rights and duties of the people in its Guide for Establishing the People’s Democratic Government. It has declared its adherence to the Geneva Conventions and Protocols. It has proclaimed the strict standards in the Basic Rules of the New People’s Army. It took the initiative to have both the Government of the Republic of the Philippines (GRP) and itself to respect the Comprehensive Agreement on Respect for Human Rights and International Humanitarian Law (CARHRIHL).

As it grows in strength, the revolutionary movement is subjected to all kinds of attacks against its integrity. Relying on the support of the people in their millions and confident that the truth will prevail against false claims, we present the stand of the revolutionary movement regarding various claims that have been raised against it recently. Since we wish to present our responses concisely, we refer all interested persons to feel free to visit our websites for further information: www.philippinerevolution.org and http://home.wanadoo.nl/ndf


CLAIM: The revolutionary movement maintains a “hit list� of its political and ideological adversaries.

ANSWER: The revolutionary movement does not maintain a “hit list�. This is an immediately slanted way to ridicule the revolutionary movement.

Political and ideological adversaries are engaged by the revolutionary movement on the level of debate and struggle of ideas. They are not subject to criminal proceedings for their ideas.

Persons charged with criminal offenses are guaranteed due process under the revolutionary movement’s legal and judicial system.

The principles and norms of the legal and judicial system of the people’s revolutionary government can be gleaned from the following documents, among others: Guide for Establishing the People’s Democratic Government, October 1972; Basic Rules of the New People’s Army, May 13, 1969; Declaration of Adherence to International Humanitarian Law, August 15, 1991; Declaration of Undertaking to Apply the Geneva Conventions of 1949 and Protocol I of 1977, July 5, 1996; and the Comprehensive Agreement on Respect for Human Rights and International Humanitarian Law, 1998.

The people’s courts are created by the revolutionary government at different levels and consist of a panel of at least three judges. Persons charged with criminal offenses before a people’s court are presumed innocent until proven guilty, and have the right to be informed of the charges filed, the right to counsel, and the right to appeal, among other rights.



CLAIM: Those who drop out from the revolutionary movement and become ideological and political adversaries of the movement are targeted for killing.

ANSWER: Individuals voluntarily join the revolutionary movement and voluntarily participate in revolutionary struggle -- utilizing their knowledge and skills, facing the hardships and sacrifices of revolutionary struggle, and laying down their very lives for the advancement of the national democratic aspirations of the people -- for as long as they are willing and able. Individuals can voluntarily leave the revolutionary movement when they wish to.

Leaving the Communist Party of the Philippines, the New People’s Army, or any of the revolutionary mass organizations is not a crime. The constitutions of these organizations guarantee the right to voluntarily join and the right of every member to resign.

Persons claiming they were formerly active members of the revolutionary organizations or the CPP are proof to refute the claim that those who drop out from the revolutionary movement are targeted for killing.

CLAIM: The armed struggle being waged by the revolutionary movement is the cause of poverty and underdevelopment in the Philippines.

ANSWER: This is turning the truth upside down. Before the people’s armed struggle, there is first the existence of the unjust social order. This unjust social order is more violent and vicious because it kills the poor daily and silently. This unjust social order cannot remain; it must be overthrown.

Those who benefit most from this existing oppressive and unjust social system and fight with all their might to maintain it are sometimes the loudest in calling for “peace�. But in fact what they want is peace of the grave. They are the first to use violence against the poor and struggling people, as in the case of the Hacienda Luisita Massacre last November 16, 2004.

Without the armed revolution started by the Katipunan in 1896, we would still be under colonialism. And so long as the Filipino people do not yet win victory against US imperialism and the local reactionaries, they would remain oppressed and exploited by these.



CLAIM: The NPA engage in gross human rights violations and destruction of property in much the same way as the AFP, the PNP, and their paramilitary units.

ANSWER: This claim is not at all borne out by the complaints and facts submitted to the Joint Monitoring Committee of the CARHRIHL and to the various human rights organizations. After six months in existence, the JMC thus far has received only two complaints of human rights violations committed by personnel and units of the NPA, in sharp contrast to the 275 complaints of human rights violations filed against the armed forces of the Government of the Republic of the Philippines.

The Red fighters and commanders of the New People’s Army follow a strict code of conduct under the rubrics of the Three Main Rules of Discipline and Eight Points of Attention requiring them to always take the interest of the people at heart and to refrain from any action that may harm them. The people know that the NPA fights for their interests and they willingly give their best sons and daughters to serve in the people’s army.

On the other hand, the Armed Forces of the Philippines (AFP), the Philippine National Police (PNP), the CAFGU and other paramilitary units commit the grossest forms of human rights violations like indiscriminate bombing and strafing of villages, ransacking of peasant homes, torture, summary executions and disappearances in the hope of terrorizing the people. They are corrupt to the core and despised by the people.

Under the Macapagal-Arroyo regime, human rights organizations have documented a total of 2,461 cases of human rights violations, victimizing 169,530 individuals, 18,515 families, 196 households, and 71 communities.

CLAIM: The Communist Party of the Philippines is responsible for the bloody witch-hunt called ‘Kampanyang Ahos’.

ANSWER: The CPP openly criticized, repudiated and comprehensively rectified the ideological and political errors which led to the tragedy and crime called ‘Kampanyang Ahos’. The Party condemns the vicious crimes committed under Kampanyang Ahos and is exerting all efforts to bring to justice those who have been accused by the surviving victims, the victims’ families, and the masses as the most responsible for the torture and unjust killing of hundreds of mass activists, NPA commanders & fighters, and CPP cadres & members.

To date, those who have been identified have managed to escape revolutionary justice by callously denying all responsibility for the crimes and violently refusing to present themselves before the people’s court, seeking refuge within the territory of the GRP, and allying themselves with rabid anti-communists. One of the accused masterminds of Kampanyang Ahos is now the chairperson of Akbayan, which is most vicious in attacking the revolutionary movement.

CLAIM: Revolutionary taxation is extortion.

The revolutionary movement is building a new society to replace the present semi-feudal and semi-colonial society characterized by widespread poverty and economic backwardness. The new society that is being built promotes the interests of the overwhelming majority of the Filipino people comprised of the workers, peasants and the middle-classes. In many areas under the control and influence of the revolutionary movement, the democratic organs of people’s government are being set up and socio-economic programs that benefit the people are being carried out.

Revolutionary taxation is a function of the people’s government. It is implemented to defray the expenses of the organs of the people’s government and to finance the socio-economic programs for the good of the people.

In general, revolutionary taxes are levied on businesses and economic concerns operating in areas under the control and influence of the revolutionary movement. Businesses, however, that cause harm and injury to the people and the country, such as commercial logging for export that causes denudation of the forests are not allowed by the revolutionary movement in areas it controls.

Real extortion consists of the reactionary government’s imposition of a heavy tax burden on the people only for the revenues to be stolen by the high bureaucrats, and then denying the people of basic social services. They collect the most taxes from the people through withholding taxes from employees’ wages and through sales taxes and the VAT. They condone notorious tax evaders like Lucio Tan. Every year, an estimated 20 percent of the budget of the reactionary government is eaten up by corruption. In 2003 alone, this amounted to PhP 180 billion.

CLAIM: The revolutionary movement is responsible for deforestation because the NPA controls the forests.

ANSWER: The widespread denudation of the forests that has been going on for many decades is caused by the reactionary government’s policy of allowing the unbridled plunder of our forest and other resources. The logging companies are licensed by the reactionary government through Timber Licensing Agreements (TLA). They are protected by this government wherever they operate, and bureaucrats and the military collaborate with illegal loggers. Just before the recent calamities, the Macapagal-Arroyo regime granted logging concessions to cronies of Mike Arroyo.

Logging for export – legal or illegal – continue because the reactionary government allows the logs to move through the highways and through the ports.

CLAIM: Permit to campaign is a form of extortion and is a violation of the freedom of expression and freedom to campaign.

ANSWER: The so-called permit to campaign is but an agreement between the revolutionary movement and politicians participating in reactionary elections. These politicians voluntarily approach the movement since they recognize its mass following. They declare that they have no hostile intentions against the movement, express their support for the movement and its programs, and agree to respect the rules of the movement for the safety of the communities and their own security. They are then granted security clearance and safe conduct in the territory of the revolutionary movement. There is no extortion. There is no violation of the freedom of expression or freedom to campaign.

CLAIM: The New People’s Army (NPA) recruits child guerrillas in violation of international standards and rules of war.

ANSWER: The NPA carries out a longstanding policy of the Central Committee of the CPP that only those who have reached the age of 18 or above may be recruited as NPA fighters. In 1988 the Political Bureau of the CPP issued a policy establishing 18 as the minimum age for NPA fighters. Furthermore, on October 15, 1999, the Executive Committee of the CPP Central Committee issued a memorandum to all Party organs and NPA commands entitled: “On the Minimum Age Requirement for the New People’s Army Fighters�. In this memo, the EC of the CPP CC stipulates the minimum age of 18 and amends the Basic Rules of the New People’s Army.

The revolutionary movement upholds the rights of children and is committed to implement the provisions of the Comprehensive Agreement on Respect for Human Rights and International Humanitarian Law (CARHRIHL) pertaining to them, such as, Article 10, Part IV Respect for International Humanitarian Law: “The Parties shall provide special attention to women and children to ensure their physical and moral integrity. Children shall not be allowed to take part in hostilities.� Article 2, No. 24, Part III Respect for Human Rights states: “The right of children and the disabled to protection, care, and a home, especially against physical and mental abuse, prostitution, drugs, forced labor, homelessness, and other similar forms of oppression and exploitation.�

Children are victimized by the widespread military operations of the AFP-PNP that are marked by forced evacuations, food and population control, indiscriminate bombardment and firing, illegal searches and arrests and other forms of fascist abuse and intimidation. The AFP-PNP have been kidnapping children from rural communities, labeling them “NPA combatants�, detaining them indefinitely, and subjecting them to cruel and humiliating treatment.

The revolutionary movement recognizes the right and capability of children to perform their role as children in cultural, health, educational and other non-combat tasks.

CLAIM: The New People’s Army (NPA) uses land mines in violation of international humanitarian laws.

ANSWER: The NPA is committed to uphold and carry out the Geneva Conventions and Protocols and other international humanitarian law. It is committed to implement the CARHRIHL. All these stipulate that the civilian population and civilians are to be protected in the course of the armed conflict.

The NPA makes use of command-detonated landmines directed at legitimate military targets. The detonation takes place upon sight of the enemy vehicle or military target. This method ensures that civilians and other non-military targets are not harmed.

Those who call on the NPA to stop using command-detonated landmines should call on the US to stop launching cruise missiles, dropping cluster bombs, using depleted uranium, and other weapons prohibited by the international laws on armed conflict. They should demand that the GRP’s armed forces stop using attack planes, helicopter gunships and 101 mm. howitzers against civilian communities and suspected areas of the NPA.

It is worth noting that the US, which is the principal supplier of weapons to the GRP’s armed forces, refuses to sign the agreement to ban anti-personnel mines. It has caused, for example, many casualties due to anti-personnel landmines around the Guantanamo Base in Cuba. ###

[darkwing]

CLAIM: Communism will win
ANSWER: look at USSR