MERGED: Ping LACSON

[omar50071]

---

1] Are you nuts? Lacson? No balls to rig an election? YEAH RIGHT!

Im sure you have seen him rigging...YEAH RIGHT!

2] You reaction is not related to the statement.

I was reacting to your "false supercop"Â* statement. Gets?

3] How naive can you be? An offer may not always active, it can be passive. Gets?

And what would that passive offer be?

Ohh let me guess....Jueteng Payola?

[nopeace]

Im still thankful Lacson ran for presidency.
Kay kun wala pa, daku jud chance ni FPJ..

I couldn't imagine FPJ as our president..
especially namatay pa jud siya few months after.. Unsa na kaha ang balita karon..

[LytSlpr]

1] Are you nuts? Lacson? No balls to rig an election? YEAH RIGHT!

Im sure you have seen him rigging...YEAH RIGHT!

2] You reaction is not related to the statement.

I was reacting to your "false supercop"Â* statement. Gets?

3] How naive can you be? An offer may not always active, it can be passive. Gets?

And what would that passive offer be?

Ohh let me guess....Jueteng Payola?

1] you're right i haven't seen him rigging an election but i just don't trust him and so does many of intellectual filipinos. so don't force the issue!

2] i know you were obviously reacting to that statement but it still has no relation. your analogy/comparison is way ahead. you apparently did not get it.

3] jueteng payola is not passive.


OBVIOUSLY, you are not for the salvation of this nation.Â* WHY Lacson?Â* When there are other potential candidates who are more experienced, more competent, more qualified, more result-oriented and most of all, who are MORE CREDIBLE than him and without any allegation whatsoever.Â* Â*If you even try to justify or defend your IDOL with this crowd, you will voluntarily expose yourself to what kind of person you really are to the people in this forum.Â* Â*Throw your trash elsewhere and please don't insult our intelligence.

I suggest that you bring your campaign to the depressed areas and to the underworlds where yout talk will be bought hook, line and sinker.

[omar50071]

1] you're right i haven't seen him rigging an election but i just don't trust him and so does many of intellectual filipinos. so don't force the issue!

And you expect intellectual filipinos will believe you just because you dont trust him? How pathetic!

2] i know you were obviously reacting to that statement but it still has no relation. your analogy/comparison is way ahead. you apparently did not get it.

Anyhow, so I did not...

3] jueteng payola is not passive.

So what could that be?

OBVIOUSLY, you are not for the salvation of this nation.Â* WHY Lacson?Â* When there are other potential candidates who are more experienced, more competent, more qualified, more result-oriented and most of all, who are MORE CREDIBLE than him and without any allegation whatsoever.Â* Â*If you even try to justify or defend your IDOL with this crowd, you will voluntarily expose yourself to what kind of person you really are to the people in this forum.Â* Â*Throw your trash elsewhere and please don't insult our intelligence.

I am not for the salvation of this nation?

How self-righteous could you be...have I insulted your intellectual self?

I suggest that you bring your campaign to the depressed areas and to the underworlds where yout talk will be bought hook, line and sinker.
Your true color is starting to shine, dont act too obvious.

[omar50071]

OBVIOUSLY, you are not for the salvation of this nation.Â* WHY Lacson?Â* When there are other potential candidates who are more experienced, more competent, more qualified, more result-oriented and most of all, who are MORE CREDIBLE than him and without any allegation whatsoever.Â* Â*If you even try to justify or defend your IDOL with this crowd, you will voluntarily expose yourself to what kind of person you really are to the people in this forum.Â* Â*Throw your trash elsewhere and please don't insult our intelligence.

I am not for the salvation of this nation?

How self-righteous could you be...have I insulted your intellectual self?

I suggest that you bring your campaign to the depressed areas and to the underworlds where yout talk will be bought hook, line and sinker.

Your true color is starting to shine, dont act too obvious.

[LytSlpr]

1] you're right i haven't seen him rigging an election but i just don't trust him and so does many of intellectual filipinos. so don't force the issue!

And you expect intellectual filipinos will believe you just because you dont trust him? How pathetic!

What the heck are you talking about?

[LytSlpr]

OBVIOUSLY, you are not for the salvation of this nation. WHY Lacson? When there are other potential candidates who are more experienced, more competent, more qualified, more result-oriented and most of all, who are MORE CREDIBLE than him and without any allegation whatsoever. If you even try to justify or defend your IDOL with this crowd, you will voluntarily expose yourself to what kind of person you really are to the people in this forum. Throw your trash elsewhere and please don't insult our intelligence.

I am not for the salvation of this nation?

How self-righteous could you be...have I insulted your intellectual self?

I suggest that you bring your campaign to the depressed areas and to the underworlds where yout talk will be bought hook, line and sinker.

Your true color is starting to shine, dont act too obvious.

1] If you were, then you wouldn't have been rooting for Lacson wouldn't you?

2] I'm stating a reality. Nobody in society in their right minds would go for Lacson despite of what you say he is.

[nopeace]

ur not stating reality, ur stating ur opinion.. ur conclusions may be ur fantasies.. i think u only hate the man. but its normal.

[LytSlpr]

ur not stating reality, ur stating ur opinion.. ur conclusions may be ur fantasies.. i think u only hate the man. but its normal.

actually, it's not an opinion. it's a very acceptable generality. if i hate the man, can you blame me?

[PissKhanXXX]

1.Â* don't have the balls to rig the election?Â* i'm sure he did rig it, too.Â* he just didn't rig it right.

Ayaw intawn pamahid sa inyong tae...abi kay nanimaho...mangamong na mo...
Baho pa sa tae si GMA karon do![/qoute]

you think he's clean.Â* guess what?Â* he's not!

2.Â* since you are certain that arroyo rigged the elections, let's put it this way: if she hadn't rigged it right, lacson's rigging could have worked. or if he rigged it right, he could have won.

I beg to disagree...FPJ could have won...Lacson only got 5M votes, compared to 12M to your fake president...mao nay nanikas?

... only 5M votes for he hadn't rigged it right.Â* my presumption, that is.

3.Â* conceding being balimbing, that is.

How could you even say that? When in fact months after the election he exposed the First Gentleman as the person in Jose Pidal account.

you don't need to be an einstein to know how politics works.

Kung mo concede defeat diay ko ani ato aguements balimbing na diay ko?

depends.