
Originally Posted by
PissKhanXXX
get this:
1.Â* you have his list of achievements from the media, a far-from-the-chaste-truth source while we have sources who rub shoulders with him.Â* these sources not having any personal interest at all.Â* why?Â* because they don't go telling the media to spread rumours and they don't want anything to do with dirty politics.Â* hence, we are not operating a rumour mill.Â* on the other hand, people who fully trust the media with everything that they say are on the same train as the opposition's rumour mill.
2.Â* you are dead serious and almost certain of his person while we comfortably sit knowing the real person that he is.Â* why?Â* go back to reason 1.
3.Â* the opposition has Sandra Cam, Gloriagate CD's, Samuel Ong, which you have the slightest clue of who these people are and what they really want.Â* since you do not know samuel ong personally, i think i would have more of the right to say what he really is.Â* but then again, you wouldn't believe me.
therefore, a list of lacson's achievements gathered from the media is less substantial compared to a list of lacson's real achievements gathered from first degree sources.
Here we go again...blah blah blah...
I believe the burden of truth is on the accuser...if you will just tell me nga nahadlok ka, then all you have is crap!
If you are a
reasonable person, you dont just believe on garbage statements coming from someone hiding his personality here in istorya...cmon you can do better than that! ayaw mi himu-ang bata nga mo tuo unsay isulti sa uban.