CBCP: Weak without SIN?

[giddyboy]

---

let's get back to the topic guys...

[hobie]

I believe CBCP is not weak. By being distant from politics, they in return are strengthening their credibility and moral value. Once they try to speak out, everyone will feel that they're not weak

[LytSlpr]

You can catch your own drift cause it's not fair to just say someone smokes pot and we just take your word for it. Be it long long long long long ago or just yesterday.
The way you said it - you're clearly demeaning the writer by implying he smokes pot. So what? Again, until you can show proof, evidence or just a link - be CAREFUL & FAIR in whatever you have to say concerning people you don't PERSONALLY know. You even said he DID NOT categorically said he does smoke pot but he just IMPLIED that he likes or is favorable in legalizing it. Maybe he has a friend who does.
Furthermore, your own opinion after seeing him in person according to you, fits his profile & personality and it all made sense? To you perhaps. But who are you to judge his appearance? What is the profile & appearance of a pothead anyway ? Are you now claiming to be an expert on the subject ?

whatever... i don't need to prove it to you. but for me his a pothead, period!

anyway, pothead or not, de quiros tends to contradict himself, in terms of values and principles.

you follow his columns, then you should know.

[mango]

whatever... i don't need to prove it to you. but for me his a pothead, period!

anyway, pothead or not, de quiros tends to contradict himself, in terms of values and principles.

you follow his columns, then you should know.

Yea- you don't only need to prove it to me but you also need to prove it to All the others who've read what you've posted. You can't get away that easily for posting something like that and just say whatever.
Again, where's your evidence, proof or link ? Next time you say something to belittle a person - support it or say nothing.
Whether I follow de Quiros' columns or not is none of your business. Likewise with what I know or don't know.
How would you like it if I say here and now you're a pothead and I just say you implied long20x time ago you like it and would want it legalized. And you ask me for proof and I just say whatever- catch my drift ?

[galy]

aheeeeemmmmm!!!! (back to the topic.....)

for me, if the cbcp will go along with the opposition's long waited desire to unset GMA,
it would mean, ..... a weak (cbcp) organization....

[Tattva]

I don't think the Church is weak. They just want to maintain their credibility.

I think so because, every time they lead the people to stand up for morality, another immoral leader comes along and this has been proven, time and again. And technically they can't do anything about it but protest and protest and people DO GET TIRED and when they do, they don't care anymore.

i'll go with this.

[LytSlpr]

Yea- you don't only need to prove it to me but you also need to prove it to All the others who've read what you've posted. You can't get away that easily for posting something like that and just say whatever.
Again, where's your evidence, proof or link ? Next time you say something to belittle a person - support it or say nothing.
Whether I follow de Quiros' columns or not is none of your business. Likewise with what I know or don't know.
How would you like it if I say here and now you're a pothead and I just say you implied long20x time ago you like it and would want it legalized. And you ask me for proof and I just say whatever- catch my drift ?

If my opinion does or does not hold water, that's my problem. For the nth time, for me HE IS A POTHEAD!

BTW, here is your LINK GROUPIE!

Only a writer with a great love for cannabis would strongly justify the use of the substance on national paper despite the aggressive campaign against Tobacco in most parts of the world particularly here in North America. Basin mangayo nasad ka ug drug test result ni De Quiros nako? Mura man intawn ka ug just now. Where have you been? an the UP studentry is also advocating the legalization of Marijuana in UP campuses. These kids may have a separate charter but for Chrissakes, they are still in the Philippines. Mao na maka-ingon ta usahay mao ra ni mga bright na bogo.

Maybe you would like to have that frontpage photo of a smiling GMA on The Inquirer walking across a Marijuana plantation with arms raised in Sagada. You want proof again? Email The Inquirer!

Here is an EXCERPT from a blog about De Quiros.

“I used to read with great interest the columns of Conrado de Quiros. But they have become nauseating; all they contain are views against President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo. I am not pro-Gloria, but I hope De Quiros will once again appreciate variety, not just limit his columns to Arroyo stories.”

Which will make an objective person ask why of all Presidents why is he isolating his anger to GMA. For me he is biased on the GMA topic, which contradicts his values and principles in his other columns. Mao na kini si De Quiros maayo lagi ni siya mo suwat per se per kuyaw sad ni ug "tama" ang buang kay suol-suol ni iyang style kung pabor ra niya.

True enough his column is a good read but ONLY A FOOL or FANATICS will agree with him hook, line and sinker. His flair for writing sometimes smokescreens the truth and could pass for a fact. Just like the Da Vinci Code issue. Bright people may be fooled by this style but definitely not the WISE.

If the man has delusions probably due to THC, then he should be a novelist, not a columnist.

[mango]

@ lytslpr

Is that it? Where's the link ? Excerpt from whose blog ? Hahay ! What part of evidence, proof or link don't you understand? BTW, no name calling please- don't get me started ! If you want me to respect you bro- better observe the golden rule! Let's agree to disagree agreeably - k ?

[hobie]

Slightly out of the topic already

[LytSlpr]

@ lytslpr

Is that it? Where's the link ? Excerpt from whose blog ? Hahay ! What part of evidence, proof or link don't you understand? BTW, no name calling please- don't get me started ! If you want me to respect you bro- better observe the golden rule! Let's agree to disagree agreeably - k ?

Find the link from my last post before you blab, KAPISCH?

Ka hilas sa mga nanaway ni De Quiros- you don't deserve to kiss his butt. If any of you can write even half as good as he does and get paid for it by PDI- that's the time you earn the right to criticize. Until then, put a lid on it !

In case you forgot, you destroyed the topic when you said this. Does it hurt TO HURT YOUR IDOL. You are such A FANATIC just like in the other thread.