Gloria wants the cha cha because she wants to rule thePhil even after her term expires on 2010!
Tataw na kaau iyang mga katuyo-an.
Gloria wants the cha cha because she wants to rule thePhil even after her term expires on 2010!
Tataw na kaau iyang mga katuyo-an.
Kining cha cha ni Gloria pang hao ciao ra ni.
Iya tuyo ani ma divert ang attention sa tawo from jueteng to cha cha.
Klaro na kaayo mga steps nimo Glo!
Cheap!
bitaw sa tinuoray bai noh, same ra gihapon kung d ta makig cha cha bai.before i'll answer yur querries, i will present first the advantages of a Parliamentary form of government..im not a pol-scie grad so nagpalaban ko mr. google...
now the best example of parliamentary government at work is SINGAPORE, ever since they adopted the one-party Parliament on 1968 they emerge as an economic tiger in SEA region thru the leadership of PM Lee Kuan Yew [..ping lacson's idol..cough]1.] Ability to facilitate the inclusion of all groups within the legislature and the executive. Because cabinets in parliamentary systems are usually drawn from members of the elected legislature, parliamentary government enables the inclusion of all political elements represented in the legislature (including minorities) in the executive. Cabinets comprising a coalition of several different parties are a typical feature of many well-established parliamentary democracies. In societies deeply divided by ethnic or other cleavages, this principle of inclusion can be vital.
2.] Flexibility and capacity to adapt to changing circumstances. Because governments in most parliamentary systems can change on the floor of the legislature without recourse to a general election, advocates of parliamentarism point to its flexibility and capacity to adapt to changing circumstances as a strong benefit. A discredited government can be dismissed from office by the parliament itself, in contrast to the fixed terms common to presidential systems.
3.] "Checks and balances". By making the executive dependent, at least in theory, upon the confidence of the legislature, parliamentary systems are said to foster greater accountability on the part of the government of the day towards the people's representatives. Proponents argue that this means that there is not only greater public control over the policy-making process, but also greater transparency in the way decisions are made.
so yur main query was "USAY KASIGURADUHAN ANI?", my answer would be..RESEARCH ABOUT SINGAPORE!
Sa puno-an jd nganong nahimo man ang usa ka gobyerno beh? Ug para asa man jd ang Gobyerno beh? Para kang kinsa man ang gobyerno beh? Kini lang ang atong basehan bah.
Bisan unsa pa nang klase sa gobyerno kung ang magdala mao ra gihapon ug estilo, ang dinuwaan nila mao lang gihapon...
Pananglitan beh si Shaq O'neal mobalhin na sd og lain nga team, unya mao ra man ang iyahang klaseng giduwaan nga duwa, mausab ba ang iyahang estilo?[/quote]
^^read my post again regarding "CHECKS & BALANCES"...
unsa man diay na ang party list bai...same concept ra man guro na sa check and balance. kung ang ibutang diha kay ang mga gipang-appoint ra ghapon same thing. unya asa man ta ug budget?
if dli c gloria ang ma PM why not! if pwede gihapon ta maka vote for PM then why not?
remember that Arroryo is only the endorser and not the implementor..this constitutional change will have to go through the 2 houses [..that basically represents the people]...and we could expect that members of both sides will do their GRUELING process before it will be fully inacted..
now if we will not do it NOW then when?..if Arroyo will not endorse it then WHO will?....
asa man kuha ug pondo ang pinas?
Pila naman ang utang nato sa WB? Kabalo ba ta nga hasta ang naa pa sa tiyan nga mga bata naa nay utang nga 30KPhp, para mabayaran ng Trilliones nga utang nato?
Ayaw ko ug ingna nga pautangon pa gihapon ta, para lang mapadayon ang cha cha!
Maayo unta ug kanang mga pro, doblehon ang ilang buwis, unya kusog kaayo moangal kung dagko na kaayo ang balayronon sa buhis.
ngano man diay sa una bai jir?
Similar Threads |
|