Core2duo 3.0 and Core2Quad 2.4

[EarlZ]

Not necessarily.

A dualcore version of the said single core is ALWAYS faster.

But im sure two brains are more than one.

Congrats Einstein , welcome to grade 1 section brown.

how about the c2d life span...... when ni cya probably ma obsolete? basin after next 2 years ma obsolete na ang c2d and Quad

T_T im tihik man gud....

The Core2Duo should still have a good 2-3 years more of lifespan before the Quads take over the low end market.

[muzikfreakah]

IF you have the budget get the highest qualies

[daddyfree]

for now core 2 duo then maybe a year or 2 upgrade into core2quad or core 2 extreme...

[weezur]

late this year na lng mg quadie kay bago Nehalem platform sa Intel, probably more efficient and cheaper by that time.

[spade]

mahal basta kara-an na parts mga bag-o ron na release barato.

[cebutech]

Update lang gamay from PCX as of Jan 4, 2008

Intel E6850 (3.0G) C2D = 12,480
Intel Q6600 (2.4G) C2Q = 12,480

[epson]

Update lang gamay from PCX as of Jan 4, 2008

Intel E6850 (3.0G) C2D = 12,480
Intel Q6600 (2.4G) C2Q = 12,480

after reading ur inclinations Quad nlng ko hehehe

[Fredrich]

Update lang gamay from PCX as of Jan 4, 2008

Intel E6850 (3.0G) C2D = 12,480
Intel Q6600 (2.4G) C2Q = 12,480

still confused. which is faster? E850 or Q6600 knowing nga 1066mhz ra ang fsb sa Q6600
? does the 1333 to 1066 mhz fsb really matters that much? comparing nga 4cores ang naa sa Q6600?

[weezur]

a lot are saying E6850 to be faster, specifically in games but probably not with Crysis. if you won't be upgrading again soon and power consumption is no question, then go maybe for the quad para future-proof gamay.

[spookey]

oh..i thought C2D is more cheaper than C2Q..

that still depends on the core speed, multiplier and manufacturing process.