
Originally Posted by
coolnezz
graphics design for the web and for print are different. for print you need precise color calibration.
For very high-end work where precision color-matching is absolutely required, the Mac continues to have a slight edge.
and most print-based graphic designers still use Apple Macs and many graphic artists and pre-press bureaus still prefer dealing with documents created on the Macintosh platform. It is also generally accepted that color calibration is more reliable on the Macintosh platform.
but don't take my word for it, ask the professionals.
oh really? you need to read more..you're talking about history...
i tell u. i've already done work for pre-press and for web..and u don't need a mac for accurate colors.. a COLOR CALIBRATOR u need.
and before..the digital CRT Mac uses is actually a SONY Trinitron..i have an APPLE flat 17" digital.. i opened it and its a SONY! while some are samsung..and send it for repair.
and the Apple Cinema LCD are still sony electronics i presume.. and thats the end of apple edge over PC.. the APPLE CINEMA..
but in raw power and all..Intel powered PC owns the hill..cuz they have the same hardware....
and do u really think that any Imac can overpower an Xtreme 6850 powered PC with 768MB 8800 GTX in SLI?
read again..
www.tomshardware.com
and ask the professional? are u saying we PC users are noobs?
artistry is in the blood..not in a sleek Hyped box..
and can't afford to buy a Mac..
yes i am..but even if i can afford to have one. i wont buy a Mac..
ill buy a PC and install multiboot PC with Win XP SP2 / Vista Professional / Linux Christian UBUNTU and Mac OS X tiger ( naa ko installer ani. hehehehe )
We PC users are not Noob.. we're ENTHUSIAST GENRE!
and what's the difference between Ur Mac and My PC? : ur OS X and who cares? i can install that in my PC.