Why Mac sucks? (Funny video :-D )

[fish]

---

weeeeeeeee depende rna sa mogamit oi

bitaw... depende ra sa mogamit... pero i still prefer mi PC...

[dartzed]

ako sad i preffer sako pc pah rin

[Visual C#]

My solution: get both (Mac and PC) at home. Problem solved.

[dartzed]

ay d ko mac ky d ko kbaw au nid to learn more pah kow

[brown_dog]

what class A hardware?

macs are elitist hardware then. it uses motorola/ibm power processor.

now. macs are elitist no more. now it uses intel xeons.and intel mobile c2d derivatives.

what separate a pc and a macs now a days?

for one thing..games..

and the PRICE!

the OS can be run in an INTEL C2D / AMD 64 X2

and so are the apps.

mac sucks.. but i just love its sleek interface.

hoping to have one.

I still think mac made the right move moving to Intel processors. Most users of mac are professional designers whether photography, movie editing, record or mixing audio kind of stuff. And what processor that are really best for those kinds of applications? Of course its the intel ones.
Since the release of the G5s(the last power PC processor for macs) it is indeed very powerful and fast processor but it is astonishingly a hot and unstable. It uses a single core RISC proessesor which burns any motherboard it touches. Its not even used in Macbooks/portables since it will literraly burn the macbook casing and the processor will fall off the laptop.

A g5 desktop has an aluminum heatsink that is larger than the motherboard itself. when looking insides a G5 you'll see nothing but heatsink for the G5 processor.
Its way too impractical for such a processor to be used in production because of its cost and instability. Not only that almost all applications are optimized for intel processors. Even the new intel processors performace are even better compared to these G5s and way cooler, stable and more flexible.
currently only ibooks are using G4 processors. Newer macbooks with intel based processors(c2ds) are way more faster, cooler and more stable comapred to G4 ibooks. Plus only Intel based macbooks can run most microsoft applications and other apps and it can even run windows xp and Vista while the G4s cannot.

Even newer G6 macpro desktop are 8 core based intel processor. Neat.

[butitoy]

I still think mac made the right move moving to Intel processors. Most users of mac are professional designers whether photography, movie editing, record or mixing audio kind of stuff. And what processor that are really best for those kinds of applications? Of course its the intel ones.
Since the release of the G5s(the last power PC processor for macs) it is indeed very powerful and fast processor but it is astonishingly a hot and unstable. It uses a single core RISC proessesor which burns any motherboard it touches. Its not even used in Macbooks/portables since it will literraly burn the macbook casing and the processor will fall off the laptop.

A g5 desktop has an aluminum heatsink that is larger than the motherboard itself. when looking insides a G5 you'll see nothing but heatsink for the G5 processor.
Its way too impractical for such a processor to be used in production because of its cost and instability. Not only that almost all applications are optimized for intel processors. Even the new intel processors performace are even better compared to these G5s and way cooler, stable and more flexible.
currently only ibooks are using G4 processors. Newer macbooks with intel based processors(c2ds) are way more faster, cooler and more stable comapred to G4 ibooks. Plus only Intel based macbooks can run most microsoft applications and other apps and it can even run windows xp and Vista while the G4s cannot.

Even newer G6 macpro desktop are 8 core based intel processor. Neat.

ok.

i recant my elitist rant.hehehe

its an elitist indeed

with its 2p x 4cores Clovertown xeons = 8cores to exploit

it can render videos at full HD.

just wondering...

can it ran my old and forever starcarft?.

hehehe.

and sakto bro. they made the right choice in moving to the intel side of the fence.

[muzikfreakah]

Hmmm, never meant for this to become a debate.

Mac is an awesome piece of hardware for people who have use for it. Great design, a multimedia behemoth. All parts were studies and tested to fit almost perfectly. Hence, your are buying a single computer appliance with Semi-limited PC upgradability. And it just works.

PC, my second wife, is for those who love the "Computer" in general, theres just so much more you can do with it in terms of Hardware and software but along with that comes the headaches and challenges of fixing it yourself. But if you dont tinker with it that much you can still have the same functionality of what a MAC can do with no headaches.

So, to conclude, yes, it would be good to have both.

[brown_dog]

Yup i agree. I like PC better but macs are undeniably interesting computers.

[shwack]

hahahaha!!!!

[butitoy]

[br]Posted on: October 31, 2007, 03:52:04 PM_________________________________________________

Hmmm, never meant for this to become a debate.

And it just works.

PC, my second wife, is for those who love the "Computer" in general, theres just so much more you can do with it in terms of Hardware and software but along with that comes the headaches and challenges of fixing it yourself. But if you dont tinker with it that much you can still have the same functionality of what a MAC can do with no headaches.

So, to conclude, yes, it would be good to have both.

yes again.

a second wife..hehehe..

except it does not s*ck..