
Originally Posted by
firestarter
Question lang bro, kung ang usa ka tawo imong gipawork sa imong company, who is a known critic nimo. Whom you knew would sell you out whenever she can, would you not be cautious?
Take a look at the video, 1:04 diha nag start ang iyang explanation nganong she will be out and for what reason.
It is not because he is the President, it is because it is the Law.
Naay mga secrets ang state (Philippine State in this matter) nga dili nimo dapat i divulge didto sa lain country. Klaro ug tataw na, Robredo is a lawyer I hope she knows asa na dapit ang limit ana.
Should she violated that law, don't you think she should be removed from her position?
Those state secrets are / were entrusted to her, and divulging such is tantamount to betrayal of public trust in the highest order.
Good thing gani nga tangtangon ra siya, dili siya filan ug criminal case which is what the law prescribes.
Actions like these are not even considered a "threat" as what you are saying, it is simple and basic matters of Law.
You are entrusted a very delicate matter of the state, it is also paramount that you hold it to the highest regard.
What you are violating should you divulge those state secrets is the Law, and not the words of the President.
Nabaligya na gyud ka anang ilang ICC ICC.
Wala pa gani ka kabalo unsay requirements ana, before a certain foreign body can intrude into a countries internal affairs.
Sa imong tanaw ang affairs of the state is a comedic episode? --
Now lay down a better argument than just ranting around, and believing what is being sold to you on the headlines.