Most iconic issue in 2018.
i dont think so... all are sinners expect god.. so, si god ra gyud ang worthy anang holy na word.. gaghang issues and scandal ang pope ug ang vatican... so not worthy to be called holy xia...
Last edited by re_con; 08-28-2018 at 11:37 PM.
kasagarang nag post against sa pope or maybe towards the catholic church even in a subtle way kay Christians ra pud who of course and should hold the bible as truth. well, let's see what the bible has to say about calling someone holy despite his/her inequities.
1 Peter 1:16 "You shall be holy, for I am holy" and in Romas 1:7 , after Jesus' resurrection mosly, followers of Christ started to call themselves "holy ones" other interpretations even uses the term "saints". therefore anyone who is a follower of Christ has been given the right to holiness. hahay, prehas rag tinuhoan maglalis pa..Lol
haha mao. I think given naman jud na rais nga e consider nga "holy" jud na ang usa ka leader sa usa ka religious sect, whether or not the leader is really holy di na na nato problema. hahaha problem man gud aning mga ingun ani nga question kay double meaning.. Lol and more often than not, the main goal really is to initiate an attack. hahaha. now, speaking of holiness as a requirement, if atong striktohon..kadtong tanan nga nag claim nga kristohanon sila, before they can claim themselves as such, diba dapat holy na pud sila? hahaha then again, di na pud nato na problema.
boss @marius bwahahaha grabe na sad na ka holy oi. syunan kag sa ka holy sugot gung mga babaye niya mapabuntisan.. kujawa!
"Holy" has two meanings, one is what we commonly understand as being sinless, and the second meaning simply means being separate. The way the question was phrased, I think si TS nag refer sa common understanding which means sinless. So no, none of us, bisan pa nang gitawag natog "holy men", belong to that category except God. Kung second meaning atong pasabot, well, all "true" Christians are, it's a distinction.
Similar Threads |
|