Obviously, you’re not getting my point. If in case i-teach man ugaling ang bisaya sa schools, the urgency of abolishing it is somehow lessened kay ngano man? Bisaya gud ta therefore naa’y gamay’ng purpose other than relevance niya sa Information Age. Now kun tagalog imong tun-an amidst the myriad of valuable things that needs to be learned ASAP, maka-ingon kaha ka nga ok ra kay tagalog sad ka?Originally Posted by SPRINGFIELD_XD_40
I hypothetically used the worthiness of bisaya as national language reasoning just to show the illegitimacy of tagalog subjects in visayan schools and the need for it to be abolished.
What are you babbling about? Mao gani nga majority because the people have willed it during a referendum, plebisito or election. Suffrage is quantity.Originally Posted by SPRINGFIELD_XD_40
If quality is in doubt, then basola ang quality of edukasyon sa voters, instead nga ma-improve ang political awareness, nalaw-gaw na hinuon ang salabutan gumikan sa pagkat-on og tagalog nga ma-apply lang kun mutan-aw og salida ni Erap ug Fernando Poe.
Pero when selecting what should be our national language, I think it doesn’t need nga wise ang majority of the people ana for their own dialect to be exalted as national language. Majority-wins principle is applicable ani nga hisgutanan…….terrorista ra ug some senseless fraternities (no offence) ang nag create og chaos.
What I mean by stand-out is in terms of mental astuteness, literacy and originality. In order to stand out, we need a heavier dose of science, engineering, business, economics, IT and mathematics for national industrialization. In order to ingest more knowledge, we need to study more. In order to study more, we need to bullsh*t less in Filipino (tagalong) classes.Originally Posted by SPRINGFIELD_XD_40
Sorry diay if na hurt ka sa TAGALEG![]()



Reply With Quote
