Aquino seeks Asean action against China
NOTE: News link courtesy of Inquirer.net
Aquino seeks Asean action against China
NOTE: News link courtesy of Inquirer.net
Last edited by anggwaponi; 01-09-2016 at 03:50 AM. Reason: sa una kun maolaw ko naay tulison Instik sa Pinoy, karon kay muingon ko merise sa Instik gitulis sa Pinoy ;)
dli gyud na mg silbi gbuhat ni pnoy,..mura ranag bata ng hagad ug sumbayan sa bouncher dli ra tagdon ang bata...kung gpa abangan palng noun nas america ng lugara para tukuran ug military base dli unta na mg gara mga intsik,..
--- updating ---
‘US won’t allow China to control West Philippine Sea’ — DND
NOTE: News link courtesy of Inquirer.net
Para nako ang kanang Spartly para man jud na sa Filipino.... unsa kang cesar kang cesar.
Tapos dili pud ko ganahan gibuhat sa atong Governo na bisag kinsa nalang na mga Alien gipatukod ug negosyo diri, ma Chinese, Indian, Americano....![]()
Tapos ang uban mag front ra ug negosyo niya na a d i iligal.
Chinoys express concern over possible upsurge of kidnappings during election season
NOTE: News link courtesy of interaksyon.com
One thing's for sure about this issue: We're not gonna win this one using by waging war against China or holding Filipino-Chinese as hostage. Regarding the latter, China has a different mindset when it wants to pursue its objectives. The lives of Filipino-Chinese are of no consequence to them. Even if the Filipino-Chinese can be our representatives in this territorial dispute, I don't think China is going to bow down and say "ooops. my bad." Just take a look at Taiwan. Just take a look at Hong Kong and how China is caving in to Hong Kong Chinese pro-democracy movements. Good luck to that! It doesn't even have problems rolling a tank over its own people.
I've heard it mentioned by Bongbong Marcos (not sure) and Duterte that China wants to engage us in some closed-door bilateral talks to settle this issue. This fact has been known for some time, but somehow P-Noy would rather jumpstart his ratings by being combative in his rhetoric against China. China, as you know, puts face-saving as a high priority and it wants to look "respected" and not bowing down to any nation in front of the world. When one deals with it in a dispute, one must make sure that there's a face-saving avenue somewhere for it wiggle around. I think the closed-door bilateral talks was a hint. I think I heard Duterte said that he once spoke to a Chinese ambassador who confided that all these activities going on at the Spratlys were "chess moves" against American presence in our region.
Let's say that, in a bilateral talk, China moves for a "joint-exploration" and perhaps a "naval base" similar to the one we grant the U.S. And behind closed doors, China signs a secret document that says it recognizes our rightful ownership of the disputed islands. We get what we want and they get to save face and score tactical move against the US. Should we say YES? Or should we say F U and go to war?
yes! you're right bai Bears Grill that China has different mindset that they don't care about Chinoys
however, how come the lokal FilChinese or the Chinoys didn't make a stand favorable to Ph or doesn't show support to Ph especially Pinoy fishermen are being harassed
besides, pursuing bilateral talks to their own advantage in which they completely ignored as signatory to ITLOS ... and i don't think they will simply just accept that we are the rightful owner of West Philippine Sea
that finally, we say NO and F U too ... shame on you as i've explained it many times it's the reason we seek UNCLOS
Beijing Is Kidnapping Critics and Spiriting Them Back to China
NOTE: News link courtesy of MSN.com
--- updating ---
Australia, NZ urge restraint on China missile deployment
NOTE: News link courtesy of interaksyon.com
Lawmakers buck China's actions in Spratlys
NOTE: News link courtesy of interaksyon.com
Similar Threads |
|