Nagkatawa ko sa question og sa argument nga gi present, its like asking why are students not allowed to bring guns or juz even knives to protect themselves since they are prone to being mugged.
Results 11 to 20 of 22
-
07-25-2014, 09:33 AM #11
-
07-25-2014, 09:48 AM #12Junior Member
- Join Date
- Jul 2008
- Posts
- 372
ako gipangutana ang bata nga grade 1 nga naay duwaan mga plastic airplanes.
ako: dong ngano bati man ang eroplano (holding a look alike passenger airplane)
bata: bati mana kay hinay di na kalupad kusog
ako: ngano man?
bata: dako man
ako unsa diay nindot?
bata: kani ay (holding that looks like a fighter plane)
ako: mao ba, ingon ko kana lang akoa beh
bata: di ko kay bati na imoha dretso na crash
-
07-25-2014, 01:43 PM #13Junior Member
- Join Date
- Jul 2014
- Gender
- Posts
- 178
hahaha maikog ko sa question
-
11-08-2014, 08:25 PM #14C.I.A.
- Join Date
- Mar 2009
- Gender
- Posts
- 6,975
The keyword for the answer actually lies in between the question - COMMERCIAL. Before actual scientific and technical explanations comes the simple logic behind it. Missiles are used for MILITARY purposes. Airliners are used for COMMERCIAL purposes. So as commercial aircraft, airliners are built and set up for revenue flying. Same thing as why buses don't have armor plates and ballistic glass windows. Aircraft that are equipped with missile countermeasures are those used for military purposes. Not necessarily limited to fighters since some cargo and utility aircraft are also equipped with countermeasures against missiles.
-
08-11-2015, 09:04 AM #15Banned User
- Join Date
- Mar 2007
- Gender
- Posts
- 3,715
greater protection and fairer compensation whenever accidents occur during flights ;)
di na ta mahadlok kun bisan pa walay missile ang mga commercial planes kay patas-an na ang insurance o bayad kun ugaling ma-crash
(so happy ang nahibilin nga pamilya o pariente 
... aheheh Lol 
)
ug dako2x na sab daw ibayad kun mawa inyo o atung gamit like damages
Senate ratifies 2 treaties on aviation
NOTE: News link courtesy of MSN.com
-
10-26-2015, 07:58 AM #16Banned User
- Join Date
- Mar 2007
- Gender
- Posts
- 3,715
kun di man gani kalikay sa missle ... at least naa na poruhan mabuhi kay maka-eject na ;) aheheh Lol
--- updating ---
Amazing airline ejection concept could prevent air-crash deaths
NOTE: News link courtesy of alltop.com
-
10-26-2015, 10:14 AM #17C.I.A.
- Join Date
- Mar 2010
- Gender
- Posts
- 2,120
It goes the same for the question, "why cant airlines equip parachute for each passenger?" Syempre ang gasto. And IMO, during accidents swift death means no pain and NO EMOTIONS experienced by passengers.
Last edited by Butitor; 10-26-2015 at 10:16 AM.
-
10-26-2015, 11:08 AM #18
"...Unless we assume the world is at war constantly and all that airspace is a threat, it just doesn't make sense for the commercial world. They release decoys meant to distract the missile, it's not always successful. And the crew still needs to maneuver the craft away from the missile."
"There is an exception: The Israeli commercial airline El Al, which rolled out anti-ballistic technology starting in 2004 and has continued to deploy new tests and systems."
MH17: Why Commercial Jets Aren't Equipped to Avoid Missiles - NBC News
-
10-26-2015, 12:36 PM #19Senior Member
- Join Date
- Aug 2009
- Gender
- Posts
- 598
well they are capable of avoiding missiles but there are other missiles that are made to be unavoidable.
-
10-26-2015, 01:07 PM #20C.I.A.
- Join Date
- Jul 2005
- Gender
- Posts
- 3,720
naa dri ai...
https://www.mcgill.ca/iasl/files/iasl/montreal1984.pdf
Reply With Quote
Advertisement
Similar Threads |
|
Posting Permissions
|