Bastos ba ang mag unay or incest? Pero sa biblia dili lagi bastos? Old testament!

[Vien]

---

see useless kaayo bro nga nangutana paka kung tubagon kag tubag gikan sa sinodanan pero dili ka mosugot sa among tubag. maypag wala nalang ka mangutana kay naa naman kay kaugalingon nimong tubag. bisan pag mag-unsa mi dirig tubag dili gihapon ka modawat. +1post count

hahahaha bitaw bro. dili man sa ingon nga nagmagahi ko noh. hinoon unya nako mo tuo bro. kung naa pay mas higher truth nga akong masugatan murag wala pa niaabot sa pagka karon.

- - - Updated - - -

ang akong tubag diri is ang imo god ang nausab.

so what if nagmagahi sa iyang ulo si Moses, usbon diay niya ang iya balaod? Blaming Moses is a weak apologetic, ngano man lagi sige patay ang tao, gi usab ba gud ang balaod nga "thou shall not kill?". Then ang mga dietary laws pod matud pa ninyo gi usab sa Ginoo. tsk tsk ... osab osab, di ba.

nya naa pa moy interpretation sa Genesis 6:6 nga di maayo , the verse said... The LORD regretted that he had made human beings on the earth, and his heart was deeply troubled. Diri ang tao na pod inyong gi basol diri.

Now don't get me wrong here ha. motoo ko og Ginoo but I somehow have a lot of disagreements sa mga fundamentalist's nga interpretation of God and the bible.

You also got some point bro. Ang pag question sa usa ka validity sa butang dili man angay himoon nga daotan kay nangutana raman ta usa pa kung klaro kaau nga walay sabit ang Scripture or discrepancy how come nga naka question man ta dili ba?

[Tetrad]

hahahaha bitaw bro. dili man sa ingon nga nagmagahi ko noh. hinoon unya nako mo tuo bro. kung naa pay mas higher truth nga akong masugatan murag wala pa niaabot sa pagka karon.

- - - Updated - - -

your avatar...tree of life? i know youre a luciferian, careful about what youre into coz it might lead you to damnation. try to watch this sermon.

You also got some point bro. Ang pag question sa usa ka validity sa butang dili man angay himoon nga daotan kay nangutana raman ta usa pa kung klaro kaau nga walay sabit ang Scripture or discrepancy how come nga naka question man ta dili ba?

Nahimuot lang ko sa imong title bro.
sakto man ang mangutana sa bisan unsang butanga, but need sad naa tay kasing2 pagdawat sa kamatuoran.
There are millions of bible believers who are far more brilliant than all of us here who firmly believes of the infallibility of God's word, the bible. Depende nana sa asa ra kutob atong kaalam sa pagsabot diha! if we treat gods word like textbooks, surely dili magka coincide imong thinking against ana....iconsider ra gud those ancient prophets of God kung unsa ilang professions, but God used them for his purpose!

Thats why the bible bro is only understood for people nga naay leading sa Holy Spirit.

1Corinthians 2:11

For what man knoweth the things of a man, save the spirit of man which is in him? even so the things of God knoweth no man, but the Spirit of God.

[Brownman_politiks]

hahahaha bitaw bro. dili man sa ingon nga nagmagahi ko noh. hinoon unya nako mo tuo bro. kung naa pay mas higher truth nga akong masugatan murag wala pa niaabot sa pagka karon.

- - - Updated - - -



You also got some point bro. Ang pag question sa usa ka validity sa butang dili man angay himoon nga daotan kay nangutana raman ta usa pa kung klaro kaau nga walay sabit ang Scripture or discrepancy how come nga naka question man ta dili ba?

sakto ka bai, di daotan ang pag pangutana. ang atp lang ani unta is honest ang motobag para hapsay ang diskosyon. Naa man gud oban diha nga e agi na lang og liko liko ang tubag.

[<SMILE>]

Well Eve was created from Adam,

Genesis 2:22
22 And the rib, which the Lord God had taken from man, made he a woman, and brought her unto the man.

This is how creation started and After Cain slew Abel,

Genesis 4:16-17
16 And Cain went out from the presence of the Lord, and dwelt in the land of Nod, on the east of Eden.
17 And Cain knew his wife; and she conceived, and bare Enoch: and he builded a city, and called the name of the city, after the name of his son, Enoch.

Genesis 5:1-6King James Version (KJV)

5 This is the book of the generations of Adam. In the day that God created man, in the likeness of God made he him;
2 Male and female created he them; and blessed them, and called their name Adam, in the day when they were created.
3 And Adam lived an hundred and thirty years, and begat a son in his own likeness, and after his image; and called his name Seth:
4 And the days of Adam after he had begotten Seth were eight hundred years: and he begat sons and daughters:
5 And all the days that Adam lived were nine hundred and thirty years: and he died.
6 And Seth lived an hundred and five years, and begat Enos:

Correct me if I'm wrong, incest in the beginning was just assumptions. What the bible clearly says is that a woman can be created out of a man's ribs and nothing is mentioned about brothers cohabit sisters.

[slabdans]

hahahaha bitaw bro. dili man sa ingon nga nagmagahi ko noh. hinoon unya nako mo tuo bro. kung naa pay mas higher truth nga akong masugatan murag wala pa niaabot sa pagka karon.

the truth is, you are not seeking for answer nor truth to your questions. you are just here its because you just want to show that you are not believed on it and wants to find for people who have the same belief of your thoughts and ideas.

seeking for higher truth? sounds funny right? Lol. you knew that nobody knows the absolute truth as you've think.

[Tetrad]

Incest kung unayon sa amahan ang anak!

“How did Adam and Eve’s kids procreate without committing incest?� | the Pastors eye

Dr. Hugh Ross of Reasons to Believe has a good answer. He says, ”Given that we are all descended from Adam and Eve, either Cain or one of his brothers must have married a sister. This would seem to violate the commands recorded in the book of Leviticus forbidding marriage between brothers and sisters. The Levitical laws, however, must be considered in their proper historical context. Though the book of Genesis condemns sexual relations between children and their parents, it nowhere prohibits a man from marrying his sister or niece. Abraham, for example, married his half-sister without compunction. Not until the time of Moses were laws established forbidding a man from marrying a sister or niece. The timing of this command makes perfect sense biologically, for genetic defects as a result of intra-family marriage would not begin to crop up until after the first few dozen generations.”

In a nutshell, though *** between parents and their children has always been out of the question, marriage between other close relatives was permitted until the time of Moses. Practically, this makes sense because as Adam and Eve’s offspring married each other the human population possibly grew to almost 5 billion within a generation (see article mentioned above)! Scientifically, this make sense in terms of the genetic defects that would have begun to arise on a grand scale if new restrictions had not been put in place. This is a good example of one of God’s moral laws (and its timing) making very good scientific sense.

[Brownman_politiks]

Well Eve was created from Adam,



This is how creation started and After Cain slew Abel,





Correct me if I'm wrong, incest in the beginning was just assumptions. What the bible clearly says is that a woman can be created out of a man's ribs and nothing is mentioned about brothers cohabit sisters.

that's what most apologists would tell you <SMILE>, their sisters bore them children.

now since you are open to other options, let me suggest this, what if there was a different race before Adam?

[slabdans]

Incest kung unayon sa amahan ang anak!

“How did Adam and Eve’s kids procreate without committing incest?� | the Pastors eye

Dr. Hugh Ross of Reasons to Believe has a good answer. He says, ”Given that we are all descended from Adam and Eve, either Cain or one of his brothers must have married a sister. This would seem to violate the commands recorded in the book of Leviticus forbidding marriage between brothers and sisters. The Levitical laws, however, must be considered in their proper historical context. Though the book of Genesis condemns sexual relations between children and their parents, it nowhere prohibits a man from marrying his sister or niece. Abraham, for example, married his half-sister without compunction. Not until the time of Moses were laws established forbidding a man from marrying a sister or niece. The timing of this command makes perfect sense biologically, for genetic defects as a result of intra-family marriage would not begin to crop up until after the first few dozen generations.”

In a nutshell, though *** between parents and their children has always been out of the question, marriage between other close relatives was permitted until the time of Moses. Practically, this makes sense because as Adam and Eve’s offspring married each other the human population possibly grew to almost 5 billion within a generation (see article mentioned above)! Scientifically, this make sense in terms of the genetic defects that would have begun to arise on a grand scale if new restrictions had not been put in place. This is a good example of one of God’s moral laws (and its timing) making very good scientific sense.

ngita paman kag link nga naa may daghan sa bible. useless ra gihapon ng tubaga kay asta nana gibalik2x nga tubag dinhi.

[Tetrad]

ayaw lang imind slabdans kung dli ka ganahan.

[slabdans]

now since you are open to other options, let me suggest this, what if there was a different race before Adam?

then everything is change. if this is true, then the theory of evolution is wrong.