US Supreme Court rules in favor of same-s3x marriage nationwide

[30121895]

---

sure ka bai, asa man na?

yap sure bai.. hehe.. even sa among HMO kay pwede ipa enrol ang ilang mga lgbt nga partner.. ^_^..

QBE

[Romeojin]

Wa man nag mention ug Gay ang Bible ... Homosexuality raman nga bawal ... so ug mag buhat ka ana hagbong najud ka ...

No word of "gay" sa Bible but rather "homosexual" and is synonymous na as gay, lesbian, bayot, tomboy. It doesnt mean na they need real *** with the same *** to become homosexual,bayot but to the act itself na practicing pagka bayot/tomboy na they prefer the same ***, make it a sin already.

Because there are groups trying to justify that its ok to be gay in thoughts but be abstinence. but I think its still wrong cause homosexual are dressing like the opposite *** it would be hard to distinguish kinsa nagpractice ug M2M dinha

Even kung naay truth ang justification of gay na pwede but with abstinence; kung gi allowed sila for gay marriage. i think wa man siguro marriage na may abstinence plus sodomy is a sin.

[slakker]

lipay mga lawyers sa america. more divorce cases for them...

[rafee]

....willing lang siya to have intimate relationship with Him, but first of all magrepent usa ang usa ka taw (repentance means not turning away from sin, but turning now to God, which is part of it is turning away from sin and recognize that you are a sinner man jud, i just make it clear lang sa exact meaning)....
.... on the matter on how we treat them, yes we will treat them as a person gihapon nga we will love them as Jesus loves all people...no discriminations, no bashing, etc...just lead to them to Jesus and introduce what He has done for us...

Willingness to change, repentance etc... are all about God's teaching for us to be saved but what about their personal feelings? Does it count ? (the fact that they were not able to choose the day when God created them)

I see it more sinful act when a gay married to an opposite s*x human being just to satisfy the Law of God (as written and interpreted by most religious people) where he/she can't fully give the Love to that person and that LOVE is God's requirement as well.
(No universal love here or love one another.. We're talking about marriage love. thnx)

[rickflag]

Huh? Ang idea diri sa uban nga kung mag repent lang ka moduol ni God, your sexual orientation will change? Wa baya na tuyua nga nabayot/tbo sila. Di ko motuo anang influenced sa environment kay daghan ko nailhan nga bata pa gani kaau bayot na. It's their in born sexual orientation and I don't think it's their fault. Kinsa may gusto ana nga life by the way?

[7DMM]

Just saying my piece. Legal doesn't always mean moral.

[M.A.D.]

It is pretty simple. It is not about morality or legality but rather of economics. If the US becomes a very gay friendly country that is going to send a message to those persecuted gay couples from other countries to transfer to the US and bring their talents along with them. Besides the US was built by immigrants and will be built by immigrants.

Of course we can't discount the existence of domestic gays in the US.

They help keep the population low and the social costs low. This is so because gay couples contribute to the government via taxes and all, they do not constrain the social security system as they cannot bear children.

However they may be able to adopt. In order for them to adopt they may have to go through a government mandated procedure. The US government may simply add in a hurdle of steps and of charge them money for more government income.

It is a similar strategy when some states legalize marijuana. It wasn't about the benefits of the plant but rather a way to invigorate and open up a niche economy which has already become a million dollar industry. This had the indirect effect of reducing the drug trade of marijuana from mexican cartels.

Same argument applies to porn. It's all about making money go around. Nothing about morality.

[lstorya]

Like, seriously!

- - - Updated - - -

And seriously guys, being gay is a sin? What is this, a backwater country who stones people to death and burn suspected witches? To be frank, I am a bit of a homophobe (only towards the guy to guy though, girl to girl s f*cking awesome in my book... just not the butch type please), but calling homosexuality a sin is a bit idiotic. Sin itself was defined in a book which was created by man, and what's more, a fairytale book. So technically, a sin, unless defined by law itself, is juz a matter of opinion created by another man being forcefully imposed to everyone else. So unless anyone can find proof that being gay is a sin other than a fairytale book, lets not be a redneck.

[bleedingboi]

They help keep the population low and the social costs low. This is so because gay couples contribute to the government via taxes and all, they do not constrain the social security system as they cannot bear children. .

And when these queers get old, we taxpayers pay for their pensions, foodstamps, healthcare bills, adult homecare and other benefits. Because they don't have kids to take care of them. Everything backfires and the middleclass Americans carry the burden.

[lstorya]

And when these queers get old, we taxpayers pay for their pensions, foodstamps, healthcare bills, adult homecare and other benefits. Because they don't have kids to take care of them. Everything backfires and the middleclass Americans carry the burden.

This is juz my 2 cents but, I think everyone here in the US when they get old, regardless if you have kids, the taxpayers still pay the pensions, foodstamps, healthcare bills and blah blah blah since most of the old people still get sent to homecare and they have this benefits. I mean, that is already the standard right? Even some Filipinos I know have already adapted that kind mindset.