NAg exist kaha ang life sa Mars?

[ghostie2472]

---

surely had life? Possibility siguro imu psabot sir

No sir, i really meant HAD life. Gosh, we haven't even scrached the surface, there may still BE life inside the planet.

[Lee Ho Khan]

No sir, i really meant HAD life. Gosh, we haven't even scrached the surface, there may still BE life inside the planet.

How can you be 100% sure nga Mars HAD life before?

[yhokz101]

How can you be 100% sure nga Mars HAD life before?

my bet, is that there were traces in mars that there was water on it.. once a upon a time long time ago..

[Lee Ho Khan]

my bet, is that there were traces in mars that there was water on it.. once a upon a time long time ago..

Haha! balik nsad ta sa argument nato before. ^_^

Yes, naay water sa mars in form of ice. (Water on Mars - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia)

But it doesn't mean if there is water, 100% naay life. Prerequisite lng ang water, but not a 100% indication of life.

[yhokz101]

Haha! balik nsad ta sa argument nato before. ^_^

Yes, naay water sa mars in form of ice. (Water on Mars - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia)

But it doesn't mean if there is water, 100% naay life. Prerequisite lng ang water, but not a 100% indication of life.

It doesn't naay life before 100% but there is a probability. Dli man nato na ma dismiss if we will look at it in a scientific way.

[Lee Ho Khan]

It doesn't naay life before 100% but there is a probability. Dli man nato na ma dismiss if we will look at it in a scientific way.

Yes, that is what I was trying to explain to him. Kay iya mn gud pagtuo kay 100%. hehe

"Mars HAD life" mn gd ingon niya. hehe

update: I'm not trying to be a dick here. I just want to point out pra ang uban sad kay dli ma misinformed.

[ghostie2472]

Yes, that is what I was trying to explain to him. Kay iya mn gud pagtuo kay 100%. hehe

"Mars HAD life" mn gd ingon niya. hehe

update: I'm not trying to be a dick here. I just want to point out pra ang uban sad kay dli ma misinformed.

Oh. Your question is the same as the question if we are alone in the universe. You may believe we are alone, while i believe we are not. Either way, both of us cannot prove it, can we? How can you be 100% sure Mars never HAD life?

Am i misinforming people here? Seriously? Unless you are 100% sure that there is or has been any life on Mars, stop questioning kay unless you have something to show, that is what i will believe in. Too much 'to see is to believe' lang?

Water isn't really an indication of life, is it? But aware ba ka brad nga bisan diri sa earth naay life na nag survive not in water but in Arsenic? Think about it, if diri lang sa earth nato naay naka survive sa poisonous substance, yes, they eat the darn thing to survive, unsa nalang kaha sa uban lugar outside sa atong planet?

You need not 'explain' anything to me brad kay unless you have something that says Mars never had life, like 100 percent and scientifically backed information, your 'explanation' means nothing to me.

[Lee Ho Khan]

Oh. Your question is the same as the question if we are alone in the universe. You may believe we are alone, while i believe we are not. Either way, both of us cannot prove it, can we? How can you be 100% sure Mars never HAD life?

Am i misinforming people here? Seriously? Unless you are 100% sure that there is or has been any life on Mars, stop questioning kay unless you have something to show, that is what i will believe in. Too much 'to see is to believe' lang?

Water isn't really an indication of life, is it? But aware ba ka brad nga bisan diri sa earth naay life na nag survive not in water but in Arsenic? Think about it, if diri lang sa earth nato naay naka survive sa poisonous substance, yes, they eat the darn thing to survive, unsa nalang kaha sa uban lugar outside sa atong planet?

You need not 'explain' anything to me brad kay unless you have something that says Mars never had life, like 100 percent and scientifically backed information, your 'explanation' means nothing to me.

Sir, I'm not saying "I'm 100% sure Mars never HAD life". I'm saying that your assumption "Mars 100% HAD life" is wrong.

I am merely trying to state, same as you, that we are not sure if Mars had life or didn't have it. I'm just trying to tell you that you can't make conclusive statements like Mars HAD life because, as you said, neither you or I know if there was really life on Mars without any scientifically backed information.

100% Sure naay life sa Mars--------naa ka dri
↑
naa ko dri
↓
100% Sure walay life sa Mars--------(imu pagtuo naa ko dri)



Hopefully mkasabot ka sa ako position

[igibouy]

Oh. Your question is the same as the question if we are alone in the universe. You may believe we are alone, while i believe we are not. Either way, both of us cannot prove it, can we? How can you be 100% sure Mars never HAD life?

A certain orbiting teapot in space would like to have a word with you.

Am i misinforming people here? Seriously? Unless you are 100% sure that there is or has been any life on Mars, stop questioning kay unless you have something to show, that is what i will believe in. Too much 'to see is to believe' lang?

Water isn't really an indication of life, is it? But aware ba ka brad nga bisan diri sa earth naay life na nag survive not in water but in Arsenic? Think about it, if diri lang sa earth nato naay naka survive sa poisonous substance, yes, they eat the darn thing to survive, unsa nalang kaha sa uban lugar outside sa atong planet?

You need not 'explain' anything to me brad kay unless you have something that says Mars never had life, like 100 percent and scientifically backed information, your 'explanation' means nothing to me.

I like how in your post you say 'to see is to believe' and 'scientifically backed information' but still be 100% sure life had once thrived in mars. I don't even know how you came up with this.

[ghostie2472]

Sir, I'm not saying "I'm 100% sure Mars never HAD life". I'm saying that your assumption "Mars 100% HAD life" is wrong.

I am merely trying to state, same as you, that we are not sure if Mars had life or didn't have it. I'm just trying to tell you that you can't make conclusive statements like Mars HAD life because, as you said, neither you or I know if there was really life on Mars without any scientifically backed information.

100% Sure naay life sa Mars--------naa ka dri
↑
naa ko dri
↓
100% Sure walay life sa Mars--------(imu pagtuo naa ko dri)



Hopefully mkasabot ka sa ako position

So you question my statement pero ikaw you're 'in between' lang? You're not saying Mars had life or has life? You're saying that my assumption is 'wrong', tell me what is 'right', then? Mag buot man ka unsa akong pag tuo brad.

- - - Updated - - -

A certain orbiting teapot in space would like to have a word with you.





I like how in your post you say 'to see is to believe' and 'scientifically backed information' but still be 100% sure life had once thrived in mars. I don't even know how you came up with this.

Well sir, neither you or me can prove life existed in Mars before. So what's the fuss all about me believing that there was life in mars? Prove me wrong nalang, if you can. Otherwise, pasagdi ko kay that's what i believe.