Kinsa jud imo gituohan kung diin jud tah gikan, ang Bible or Science?

[SioDenz]

---

Copy Paste Strikes Again...

[nierky]

Copy Paste Strikes Again...

indeed!!!!!

another 1 bottle plsssssssssssssss!

[noy]

Nangangkon nasad mong mga bugoa mo, mga baga mog nawong, kanang naka sulat anang bibliya ninyo, mao na jud na, kung ni ingon ug 6 days, 6 days ra gyud na, kung gi ingun na gi magicx2 sa inyuhang fairytale skyfairy, you should take it literally, wala nay lain. MGA BAGAG NAWONG. ni sakay lang mo sa evolution kay kataw-anan na kaayo nang fairytale ninyo.

May gani hangtud karon naa gihapoy HONEST ug naay Paninindigan na mga kristiyano na would take the creation fairytale literally, gi magicx2 ra daw tanan, bahalag mura silag buang kay mu tuo sila ug ing-ana basta naa lang silay paninindigan sama ni SioDenz.

Pero kaning ubang kristiyano mga bagag nawong mu sakayx2 dayon sa evolution hahahaha

Naa lagi "Scientists" na mu tuo gihapon ug fairytale bible pero gamay ra kaayo, mga 1% ra sa scientific community, tanang leading scientists ron kay mga atheists.

kung pangayoan ta ka ug actual statistics concerning the actual population of Scientists as well as who does and does not believe in the Bible..makahatag ka to support your claim nga 1% ra sa actual population?
kung di ka kahatag...ayaw butang2x ug figures..

some people can't relate the biblical creation accounts with Scientific ones..some can..
some, don't believe in the Christian God..some believe that the bible is False..some hold it as divine...
young earth creationism, theistic evolutionism and atheistic evolutionism are different point of views, approach about the subject..
lahi2x ug panahom kada usa ka tao..each perspective would claim to hold the right point of view..
nowm as human beings..how do we deal with these vast and diverse perspectives..
simple..respetohon nato ang nagka lain-laing panahom...kung bogo ang mga tao nga di prehas nimu ug panahom...aw bogo sad ka para nila...
halata kaayo nga naa kay problema when dealing with opposite opinions..i suggest you shut your mouth if you have nothing good and sensible to say..

mutuo ka ug cause and effect diba? o tan.awa ning resulta imung ka bastos...banned dritso..

[Vedder]

kung pangayoan ta ka ug actual statistics concerning the actual population of Scientists as well as who does and does not believe in the Bible..makahatag ka to support your claim nga 1% ra sa actual population?
kung di ka kahatag...ayaw butang2x ug figures..

some people can't relate the biblical creation accounts with Scientific ones..some can..
some, don't believe in the Christian God..some believe that the bible is False..some hold it as divine...
young earth creationism, theistic evolutionism and atheistic evolutionism are different point of views, approach about the subject..
lahi2x ug panahom kada usa ka tao..each perspective would claim to hold the right point of view..
nowm as human beings..how do we deal with these vast and diverse perspectives..
simple..respetohon nato ang nagka lain-laing panahom...kung bogo ang mga tao nga di prehas nimu ug panahom...aw bogo sad ka para nila...
halata kaayo nga naa kay problema when dealing with opposite opinions..i suggest you shut your mouth if you have nothing good and sensible to say..

mutuo ka ug cause and effect diba? o tan.awa ning resulta imung ka bastos...banned dritso..

Theistic Evolution? Mga pari ray nag buot buot ana.

Way scientist na naa sa saktong pangutok na mu recognize anang THEISTIC Evolution. hahaha

Maski si Charles Darwin na wala pa kaayo niya nasabtan ang Evolution during his time wala jud niya gisagolan ug magicx2 iyahang theory, kay kabalo siya na produkto gyud ni sa evolution tanan up to the first living organism, way sagol na magicx2 ug hokus pokus.

Can't you see the contradiction between the two words.."THEISTIC" a.k.a MAGICx2/Delusion...."EVOLUTION" reality, scientifically tested.

Pagka bugo jud nimo. UGOK.

Maypa ni si SioDenz, maski mura siyag buang mu angkon jud siya na 5000 years old ang earth, unya gi magicx2 ra siya iyahang ginoo ang tao, way evolution na nahitabo, Mao na ang Kristiyanong naay paninindigan.

[slabs4]

hasula ui...wala man discussion maypa mag textmate ta

potpolima
Regular Member

User Items All feedback POSITIVE only NEGATIVE only
Member since: December 07, 2013 02:23 PM
Last online: December 26, 2013 09:05 PM
Location: Cebu - Consolacion
Contact Number: 09273028179

hasta imong buy and sell thread daghan gihapon nag reklamo

e clear na nako silang @pakinimo ug @porbidaman...sorry nasayop rako, saons sahay man gud mosunod man sad mo niya

[noy]

Theistic Evolution? Mga pari ray nag buot buot ana.

Way scientist na naa sa saktong pangutok na mu recognize anang THEISTIC Evolution. hahaha

Maski si Charles Darwin na wala pa kaayo niya nasabtan ang Evolution during his time wala jud niya gisagolan ug magicx2 iyahang theory, kay kabalo siya na produkto gyud ni sa evolution tanan up to the first living organism, way sagol na magicx2 ug hokus pokus.

Can't you see the contradiction between the two words.."THEISTIC" a.k.a MAGICx2/Delusion...."EVOLUTION" reality, scientifically tested.

Pagka bugo jud nimo. UGOK.

Maypa ni si SioDenz, maski mura siyag buang mu angkon jud siya na 5000 years old ang earth, unya gi magicx2 ra siya iyahang ginoo ang tao, way evolution na nahitabo, Mao na ang Kristiyanong naay paninindigan.

naa man kay sakit sa utok dong..liwat2x man kas ISIS sa Iraq..pasalamat ka wa ka na muslim..kung nahitabo pa..suicide bomber na ka...

on theistic evolution,it is how a certain point of view is described..kung tao ka who doesn't see a conflict between evolution and biblical creation accounts..then you are a theistic evolutionist....ikaw ra mismo nag ingun nga 1%(this remains to be proven if sakto imung figures) sa tanang population sa mga scientist mutuo ug Bible..so kay scientist man..mutuo jud na ug science..unya kay mutuo man ug Bible...ergo, theistic evolutionist na siya..simple ra kaayo diba?

Theistic evolutionism is not dogmatic or something that is mandated by the Church
in fact, open and Church if unsay gusto tuhoan sa usa ka Katoliko..but the Church's position is that Truth cannot contradict Truth..Science and Bible offers different sides of Truth...wa ka ka kuha? of course..kay di man ka mutuoo ana..
ug wa nay kaso...imoha man pud na...ang tarong nga tao brad...kanang tao nga maayo ug buot ug naay saktong pamatasan..
muingon ra na nga kung mao na imo..aw imoha na..lahi lang pud akong panan-aw anang mga butanga..
di na manawag ug bogo...unsa pa na dihang mga style nimu nga paka uwaw lang..

karun nganu manghilabut man ka sa ubang tao nga di prehas nimu ug panahom?
naa kay problema sa imung kina-iya..usba na kay bati kaayo ka ug batasan. kuwang ka sa pansin..ambut gi unsa ka pagpadako sa imung ginikanan nga murag man kag nalisona...

naa pa kay pa sundog2x ni slabdans sa una? unsay nasulod sa imung utok dong? bakokang?

asa naman imung statistics sa 1%?

pataka lang kag yaw2x anang mga pari muy nag imbento sa theistic evolution, description of perspective kana dong..Lol

[Vedder]

naa man kay sakit sa utok dong..liwat2x man kas ISIS sa Iraq..pasalamat ka wa ka na muslim..kung nahitabo pa..suicide bomber na ka...

on theistic evolution,it is how a certain point of view is described..kung tao ka who doesn't see a conflict between evolution and biblical creation accounts..then you are a theistic evolutionist....ikaw ra mismo nag ingun nga 1%(this remains to be proven if sakto imung figures) sa tanang population sa mga scientist mutuo ug Bible..so kay scientist man..mutuo jud na ug science..unya kay mutuo man ug Bible...ergo, theistic evolutionist na siya..simple ra kaayo diba?

Theistic evolutionism is not dogmatic or something that is mandated by the Church
in fact, open and Church if unsay gusto tuhoan sa usa ka Katoliko..but the Church's position is that Truth cannot contradict Truth..Science and Bible offers different sides of Truth...wa ka ka kuha? of course..kay di man ka mutuoo ana..
ug wa nay kaso...imoha man pud na...ang tarong nga tao brad...kanang tao nga maayo ug buot ug naay saktong pamatasan..
muingon ra na nga kung mao na imo..aw imoha na..lahi lang pud akong panan-aw anang mga butanga..
di na manawag ug bogo...unsa pa na dihang mga style nimu nga paka uwaw lang..

karun nganu manghilabut man ka sa ubang tao nga di prehas nimu ug panahom?
naa kay problema sa imung kina-iya..usba na kay bati kaayo ka ug batasan. kuwang ka sa pansin..ambut gi unsa ka pagpadako sa imung ginikanan nga murag man kag nalisona...

naa pa kay pa sundog2x ni slabdans sa una? unsay nasulod sa imung utok dong? bakokang?

asa naman imung statistics sa 1%?

pataka lang kag yaw2x anang mga pari muy nag imbento sa theistic evolution, description of perspective kana dong..Lol

Wala koy paki-alam sa imong drama diha UGOK.

Theistic Evolution sa imong mata, nganli kog non-christian scientist na mu recognize anang theistic evolution nimo BUGO.

Ikaw ray naay sakit sa utok, Theistic unya Evolution? Mao ganing gi tawag nang Evolution ni Darwin kay scientifically verified, unya sagolan pa gyud ninyug binuang na "Theistic" na nag sugod kunuhay sa inyuhang imaginary god tanan na imaginary ra unya wala juy verification. Pagka-oplok jud nimo dong, mao mao ra mo ka bugo ni slabdans.

Nganli kog isa maski isa lang ka NON-Christian Scientist na mu supporta anang Theistic Evolution nimo BUGO TANGA.

Gamitun pa nimo ang science sa imung ka bugo ah.

[brendomar]

eh, kahait naba sa mga pulong diri. away namay gipangita sa uban dili na discussion.

[noy]

Wala koy paki-alam sa imong drama diha UGOK.

Theistic Evolution sa imong mata, nganli kog non-christian scientist na mu recognize anang theistic evolution nimo BUGO.

Ikaw ray naay sakit sa utok, Theistic unya Evolution? Mao ganing gi tawag nang Evolution ni Darwin kay scientifically verified, unya sagolan pa gyud ninyug binuang na "Theistic" na nag sugod kunuhay sa inyuhang imaginary god tanan na imaginary ra unya wala juy verification. Pagka-oplok jud nimo dong, mao mao ra mo ka bugo ni slabdans.

Nganli kog isa maski isa lang ka NON-Christian Scientist na mu supporta anang Theistic Evolution nimo BUGO TANGA.

Gamitun pa nimo ang science sa imung ka bugo ah.

drama? it's called Ethics dong. saktong pamatasan sa binisaya pa..

Magic2x? taka lang ka ug sabut..it's called allegorical interpretation dong.
in metaphors and the likes (not to be confused with myths though).

kung muingon ko "sa akong gahum naghimo ko ug auto"..if taken literally, aw di jud na tinuod..naa ba diay koy gahum?Lol
but allegorically, this would open a more rational perspective.
if by power i mean, intelligence and skill..then it's not at all that impossible..and it would make sense.
same thing with "God created man from dust" where dust could represent nature and that single phrase could mean years and years of biological evolution...
dili ni sakay-sakay dong..'cause the bible itself states that God's thoughts are not our thoughts..and a day of the Lord could be a thousand years..
sige tag balik2x...why on earth would a person demand scientific accounts from the Bible esp in creation when it is not a science book to begin with...that per se is a logical failure..
mao ni imohang panahom ay--the bible is false 'cause evolution is nowhere to be found in that silly book..
would you ask a Filipino teacher to solve your Math problems? No...who's being silly now..

non-Christian Scientist who holds theistic evolution? LOL Christian perspective kanang Theistic evolution dong..
so kanang imung pag pangayo ug example of a non-Christian, theistic evolutionist scientist nagpaila kana nga wala ka kasabut aning mga butanga..

gamiton ang Science sa ka bugo? how so? basin gamiton ang Science para ingnon bright..
and Yes, i 'm directly referring to you...

if mamugos jud ka that evolution is not directed by a certain intelligence, can you prove it?
if not, then that means theistic evolutionism is a valid approach. and you need to deal with it..
otherwise di ka mu survive diris kalibutan which is full of diversities..

my religion teaches to respect and love...murag mao nay kinahanglan nimu dong.. mao sigurong bastos kaayo ka kay wala kay relihiyon..hehehe.. tsk tsk..

kung Atheist jud ka which i highly doubt, you are giving Atheism a bad name..a disgrace or some sort to the point of view...
just because you don't believe that a supreme being lays over the foundation of morality you can utterly dismiss good morals..
again, dili ni drama2x dong..ETHICS ni..giunsa kaha ka pagpadako sa imung ginikanan sah? asa kaha ka pagtudlo sa GMRC pag elemtary nimu, asa kaha ka pag values education sa high school? ug basin namayabas ka pag college during your Philo 2(Ethics) class..Lol so tan.awa ning resulta? shabu pa! Lol

[brendomar]

gitinuod man pud nimo dretso noy oi! btaw, ubang "atheist" kunuhay nakabasa lang ug science articles nagtuo na nga insakto nya kung timbang2on jud ilang reasoning, perteng layoa ra sa tinuod.